mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-11-07 19:06:32 +03:00
Rethink original decision to use AND/OR Expr nodes to represent bitmap
logic operations during planning. Seems cleaner to create two new Path node types, instead --- this avoids duplication of cost-estimation code. Also, create an enable_bitmapscan GUC parameter to control use of bitmap plans.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ RelOptInfo - a relation or joined relations
|
||||
Path - every way to generate a RelOptInfo(sequential,index,joins)
|
||||
SeqScan - a plain Path node with pathtype = T_SeqScan
|
||||
IndexPath - index scans
|
||||
BitmapHeapPath - top of a bitmapped index scan
|
||||
TidPath - scan by CTID
|
||||
AppendPath - append multiple subpaths together
|
||||
ResultPath - a Result plan node (used for variable-free tlist or qual)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c,v 1.126 2005/04/19 22:35:15 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c,v 1.127 2005/04/21 19:18:12 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -901,6 +901,12 @@ print_path(Query *root, Path *path, int indent)
|
||||
case T_BitmapHeapPath:
|
||||
ptype = "BitmapHeapScan";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case T_BitmapAndPath:
|
||||
ptype = "BitmapAndPath";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case T_BitmapOrPath:
|
||||
ptype = "BitmapOrPath";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case T_TidPath:
|
||||
ptype = "TidScan";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
|
||||
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c,v 1.143 2005/04/21 02:28:01 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c,v 1.144 2005/04/21 19:18:12 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ Cost disable_cost = 100000000.0;
|
||||
|
||||
bool enable_seqscan = true;
|
||||
bool enable_indexscan = true;
|
||||
bool enable_bitmapscan = true;
|
||||
bool enable_tidscan = true;
|
||||
bool enable_sort = true;
|
||||
bool enable_hashagg = true;
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ bool enable_hashjoin = true;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static bool cost_qual_eval_walker(Node *node, QualCost *total);
|
||||
static Selectivity cost_bitmap_qual(Node *bitmapqual, Cost *totalCost);
|
||||
static void cost_bitmap_tree_node(Path *path, Cost *cost, Selectivity *selec);
|
||||
static Selectivity approx_selectivity(Query *root, List *quals,
|
||||
JoinType jointype);
|
||||
static Selectivity join_in_selectivity(JoinPath *path, Query *root);
|
||||
@@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ cost_index(IndexPath *path, Query *root,
|
||||
PointerGetDatum(&indexCorrelation));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Save amcostestimate's results for possible use by cost_bitmap_scan.
|
||||
* Save amcostestimate's results for possible use in bitmap scan planning.
|
||||
* We don't bother to save indexStartupCost or indexCorrelation, because
|
||||
* a bitmap scan doesn't care about either.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -414,19 +415,19 @@ cost_index(IndexPath *path, Query *root,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* cost_bitmap_scan
|
||||
* cost_bitmap_heap_scan
|
||||
* Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using a bitmap
|
||||
* index-then-heap plan.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 'root' is the query root
|
||||
* 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned
|
||||
* 'bitmapqual' is an AND/OR tree of IndexPaths for the component scans
|
||||
* 'bitmapqual' is a tree of IndexPaths, BitmapAndPaths, and BitmapOrPaths
|
||||
* 'is_injoin' is T if we are considering using the scan as the inside
|
||||
* of a nestloop join (hence, some of the quals are join clauses)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
cost_bitmap_scan(Path *path, Query *root, RelOptInfo *baserel,
|
||||
Node *bitmapqual, bool is_injoin)
|
||||
cost_bitmap_heap_scan(Path *path, Query *root, RelOptInfo *baserel,
|
||||
Path *bitmapqual, bool is_injoin)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Cost startup_cost = 0;
|
||||
Cost run_cost = 0;
|
||||
@@ -443,15 +444,14 @@ cost_bitmap_scan(Path *path, Query *root, RelOptInfo *baserel,
|
||||
Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
|
||||
Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!enable_indexscan) /* XXX use a separate enable flag? */
|
||||
if (!enable_bitmapscan)
|
||||
startup_cost += disable_cost;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Estimate total cost of obtaining the bitmap, as well as its total
|
||||
* Fetch total cost of obtaining the bitmap, as well as its total
|
||||
* selectivity.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
indexTotalCost = 0;
|
||||
indexSelectivity = cost_bitmap_qual(bitmapqual, &indexTotalCost);
|
||||
cost_bitmap_tree_node(bitmapqual, &indexTotalCost, &indexSelectivity);
|
||||
|
||||
startup_cost += indexTotalCost;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -497,82 +497,120 @@ cost_bitmap_scan(Path *path, Query *root, RelOptInfo *baserel,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* cost_bitmap_qual
|
||||
* Recursively examine the AND/OR/IndexPath tree for a bitmap scan
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Total execution costs are added to *totalCost (so caller must be sure
|
||||
* to initialize that to zero). Estimated total selectivity of the bitmap
|
||||
* is returned as the function result.
|
||||
* cost_bitmap_tree_node
|
||||
* Extract cost and selectivity from a bitmap tree node (index/and/or)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static Selectivity
|
||||
cost_bitmap_qual(Node *bitmapqual, Cost *totalCost)
|
||||
static void
|
||||
cost_bitmap_tree_node(Path *path, Cost *cost, Selectivity *selec)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Selectivity result;
|
||||
Selectivity subresult;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
if (and_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
if (IsA(path, IndexPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We estimate AND selectivity on the assumption that the inputs
|
||||
* are independent. This is probably often wrong, but we don't
|
||||
* have the info to do better.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The runtime cost of the BitmapAnd itself is estimated at 100x
|
||||
* cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_intersect needed. Probably too
|
||||
* small, definitely too simplistic?
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This must agree with make_bitmap_and in createplan.c.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
result = 1.0;
|
||||
foreach(l, ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
subresult = cost_bitmap_qual((Node *) lfirst(l), totalCost);
|
||||
result *= subresult;
|
||||
if (l != list_head(((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args))
|
||||
*totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
*cost = ((IndexPath *) path)->indextotalcost;
|
||||
*selec = ((IndexPath *) path)->indexselectivity;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (or_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
else if (IsA(path, BitmapAndPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We estimate OR selectivity on the assumption that the inputs
|
||||
* are non-overlapping, since that's often the case in "x IN (list)"
|
||||
* type situations. Of course, we clamp to 1.0 at the end.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The runtime cost of the BitmapOr itself is estimated at 100x
|
||||
* cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_union needed. Probably too
|
||||
* small, definitely too simplistic? We are aware that the tbm_unions
|
||||
* are optimized out when the inputs are BitmapIndexScans.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This must agree with make_bitmap_or in createplan.c.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
result = 0.0;
|
||||
foreach(l, ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
subresult = cost_bitmap_qual((Node *) lfirst(l), totalCost);
|
||||
result += subresult;
|
||||
if (l != list_head(((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args) &&
|
||||
!IsA((Node *) lfirst(l), IndexPath))
|
||||
*totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = Min(result, 1.0);
|
||||
*cost = path->total_cost;
|
||||
*selec = ((BitmapAndPath *) path)->bitmapselectivity;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, IndexPath))
|
||||
else if (IsA(path, BitmapOrPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
IndexPath *ipath = (IndexPath *) bitmapqual;
|
||||
|
||||
/* this must agree with create_bitmap_subplan in createplan.c */
|
||||
*totalCost += ipath->indextotalcost;
|
||||
result = ipath->indexselectivity;
|
||||
*cost = path->total_cost;
|
||||
*selec = ((BitmapOrPath *) path)->bitmapselectivity;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized node type: %d", nodeTag(bitmapqual));
|
||||
result = 0.0; /* keep compiler quiet */
|
||||
}
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized node type: %d", nodeTag(path));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* cost_bitmap_and_node
|
||||
* Estimate the cost of a BitmapAnd node
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that this considers only the costs of index scanning and bitmap
|
||||
* creation, not the eventual heap access. In that sense the object isn't
|
||||
* truly a Path, but it has enough path-like properties (costs in particular)
|
||||
* to warrant treating it as one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
cost_bitmap_and_node(BitmapAndPath *path, Query *root)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Cost totalCost;
|
||||
Selectivity selec;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We estimate AND selectivity on the assumption that the inputs
|
||||
* are independent. This is probably often wrong, but we don't
|
||||
* have the info to do better.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The runtime cost of the BitmapAnd itself is estimated at 100x
|
||||
* cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_intersect needed. Probably too
|
||||
* small, definitely too simplistic?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
totalCost = 0.0;
|
||||
selec = 1.0;
|
||||
foreach(l, path->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l);
|
||||
Cost subCost;
|
||||
Selectivity subselec;
|
||||
|
||||
cost_bitmap_tree_node(subpath, &subCost, &subselec);
|
||||
|
||||
selec *= subselec;
|
||||
|
||||
totalCost += subCost;
|
||||
if (l != list_head(path->bitmapquals))
|
||||
totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
path->bitmapselectivity = selec;
|
||||
path->path.startup_cost = totalCost;
|
||||
path->path.total_cost = totalCost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* cost_bitmap_or_node
|
||||
* Estimate the cost of a BitmapOr node
|
||||
*
|
||||
* See comments for cost_bitmap_and_node.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
cost_bitmap_or_node(BitmapOrPath *path, Query *root)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Cost totalCost;
|
||||
Selectivity selec;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We estimate OR selectivity on the assumption that the inputs
|
||||
* are non-overlapping, since that's often the case in "x IN (list)"
|
||||
* type situations. Of course, we clamp to 1.0 at the end.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The runtime cost of the BitmapOr itself is estimated at 100x
|
||||
* cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_union needed. Probably too
|
||||
* small, definitely too simplistic? We are aware that the tbm_unions
|
||||
* are optimized out when the inputs are BitmapIndexScans.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
totalCost = 0.0;
|
||||
selec = 0.0;
|
||||
foreach(l, path->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l);
|
||||
Cost subCost;
|
||||
Selectivity subselec;
|
||||
|
||||
cost_bitmap_tree_node(subpath, &subCost, &subselec);
|
||||
|
||||
selec += subselec;
|
||||
|
||||
totalCost += subCost;
|
||||
if (l != list_head(path->bitmapquals) &&
|
||||
!IsA(subpath, IndexPath))
|
||||
totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
path->bitmapselectivity = Min(selec, 1.0);
|
||||
path->path.startup_cost = totalCost;
|
||||
path->path.total_cost = totalCost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c,v 1.181 2005/04/21 02:28:01 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c,v 1.182 2005/04/21 19:18:12 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ static IndexScan *create_indexscan_plan(Query *root, IndexPath *best_path,
|
||||
static BitmapHeapScan *create_bitmap_scan_plan(Query *root,
|
||||
BitmapHeapPath *best_path,
|
||||
List *tlist, List *scan_clauses);
|
||||
static Plan *create_bitmap_subplan(Query *root, Node *bitmapqual);
|
||||
static List *create_bitmap_qual(Node *bitmapqual);
|
||||
static List *create_bitmap_indxqual(Node *bitmapqual);
|
||||
static Plan *create_bitmap_subplan(Query *root, Path *bitmapqual);
|
||||
static List *create_bitmap_qual(Path *bitmapqual);
|
||||
static List *create_bitmap_indxqual(Path *bitmapqual);
|
||||
static TidScan *create_tidscan_plan(Query *root, TidPath *best_path,
|
||||
List *tlist, List *scan_clauses);
|
||||
static SubqueryScan *create_subqueryscan_plan(Query *root, Path *best_path,
|
||||
@@ -928,37 +928,41 @@ create_bitmap_scan_plan(Query *root,
|
||||
* Given a bitmapqual tree, generate the Plan tree that implements it
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static Plan *
|
||||
create_bitmap_subplan(Query *root, Node *bitmapqual)
|
||||
create_bitmap_subplan(Query *root, Path *bitmapqual)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Plan *plan;
|
||||
Plan *subplan;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bitmapqual == NULL)
|
||||
return NULL; /* probably can't happen */
|
||||
if (IsA(bitmapqual, List))
|
||||
if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapAndPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* this case is to handle the List arguments of AND/OR */
|
||||
BitmapAndPath *apath = (BitmapAndPath *) bitmapqual;
|
||||
List *newlist = NIL;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(l, (List *) bitmapqual)
|
||||
foreach(l, apath->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
subplan = create_bitmap_subplan(root, lfirst(l));
|
||||
Plan *subplan = create_bitmap_subplan(root, lfirst(l));
|
||||
|
||||
newlist = lappend(newlist, subplan);
|
||||
}
|
||||
plan = (Plan *) newlist;
|
||||
plan = (Plan *) make_bitmap_and(newlist);
|
||||
copy_path_costsize(plan, bitmapqual);
|
||||
plan->plan_width = 0; /* meaningless */
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (and_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapOrPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
subplan = create_bitmap_subplan(root,
|
||||
(Node *) ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args);
|
||||
plan = (Plan *) make_bitmap_and((List *) subplan);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (or_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
{
|
||||
subplan = create_bitmap_subplan(root,
|
||||
(Node *) ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args);
|
||||
plan = (Plan *) make_bitmap_or((List *) subplan);
|
||||
BitmapOrPath *opath = (BitmapOrPath *) bitmapqual;
|
||||
List *newlist = NIL;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(l, opath->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Plan *subplan = create_bitmap_subplan(root, lfirst(l));
|
||||
|
||||
newlist = lappend(newlist, subplan);
|
||||
}
|
||||
plan = (Plan *) make_bitmap_or(newlist);
|
||||
copy_path_costsize(plan, bitmapqual);
|
||||
plan->plan_width = 0; /* meaningless */
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, IndexPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -976,7 +980,6 @@ create_bitmap_subplan(Query *root, Node *bitmapqual)
|
||||
linitial(iscan->indxqualorig),
|
||||
linitial(iscan->indxstrategy),
|
||||
linitial(iscan->indxsubtype));
|
||||
/* this must agree with cost_bitmap_qual in costsize.c */
|
||||
bscan->scan.plan.startup_cost = 0.0;
|
||||
bscan->scan.plan.total_cost = ipath->indextotalcost;
|
||||
bscan->scan.plan.plan_rows =
|
||||
@@ -999,28 +1002,30 @@ create_bitmap_subplan(Query *root, Node *bitmapqual)
|
||||
* The result is expressed as an implicit-AND list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static List *
|
||||
create_bitmap_qual(Node *bitmapqual)
|
||||
create_bitmap_qual(Path *bitmapqual)
|
||||
{
|
||||
List *result;
|
||||
List *sublist;
|
||||
|
||||
if (and_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapAndPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapAndPath *apath = (BitmapAndPath *) bitmapqual;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
result = NIL;
|
||||
foreach(l, ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args)
|
||||
foreach(l, apath->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
sublist = create_bitmap_qual(lfirst(l));
|
||||
result = list_concat(result, sublist);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (or_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapOrPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapOrPath *opath = (BitmapOrPath *) bitmapqual;
|
||||
List *newlist = NIL;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(l, ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args)
|
||||
foreach(l, opath->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
sublist = create_bitmap_qual(lfirst(l));
|
||||
if (sublist == NIL)
|
||||
@@ -1056,26 +1061,29 @@ create_bitmap_qual(Node *bitmapqual)
|
||||
* to enforce, which may be weaker than the original qual expressions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static List *
|
||||
create_bitmap_indxqual(Node *bitmapqual)
|
||||
create_bitmap_indxqual(Path *bitmapqual)
|
||||
{
|
||||
List *result;
|
||||
List *sublist;
|
||||
ListCell *l;
|
||||
|
||||
if (and_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapAndPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapAndPath *apath = (BitmapAndPath *) bitmapqual;
|
||||
|
||||
result = NIL;
|
||||
foreach(l, ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args)
|
||||
foreach(l, apath->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
sublist = create_bitmap_indxqual(lfirst(l));
|
||||
result = list_concat(result, sublist);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (or_clause(bitmapqual))
|
||||
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapOrPath))
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapOrPath *opath = (BitmapOrPath *) bitmapqual;
|
||||
List *newlist = NIL;
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(l, ((BoolExpr *) bitmapqual)->args)
|
||||
foreach(l, opath->bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
sublist = create_bitmap_indxqual(lfirst(l));
|
||||
if (sublist == NIL)
|
||||
@@ -2067,34 +2075,8 @@ make_bitmap_and(List *bitmapplans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapAnd *node = makeNode(BitmapAnd);
|
||||
Plan *plan = &node->plan;
|
||||
ListCell *subnode;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Compute cost as sum of subplan costs, plus 100x cpu_operator_cost
|
||||
* (a pretty arbitrary amount, agreed) for each tbm_intersect needed.
|
||||
* This must agree with cost_bitmap_qual in costsize.c.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
plan->startup_cost = 0;
|
||||
plan->total_cost = 0;
|
||||
plan->plan_rows = 0;
|
||||
plan->plan_width = 0; /* meaningless */
|
||||
foreach(subnode, bitmapplans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Plan *subplan = (Plan *) lfirst(subnode);
|
||||
|
||||
if (subnode == list_head(bitmapplans)) /* first node? */
|
||||
{
|
||||
plan->startup_cost = subplan->startup_cost;
|
||||
plan->plan_rows = subplan->plan_rows;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
plan->total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * 100.0;
|
||||
plan->plan_rows = Min(plan->plan_rows, subplan->plan_rows);
|
||||
}
|
||||
plan->total_cost += subplan->total_cost;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* cost should be inserted by caller */
|
||||
plan->targetlist = NIL;
|
||||
plan->qual = NIL;
|
||||
plan->lefttree = NULL;
|
||||
@@ -2109,32 +2091,8 @@ make_bitmap_or(List *bitmapplans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapOr *node = makeNode(BitmapOr);
|
||||
Plan *plan = &node->plan;
|
||||
ListCell *subnode;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Compute cost as sum of subplan costs, plus 100x cpu_operator_cost
|
||||
* (a pretty arbitrary amount, agreed) for each tbm_union needed.
|
||||
* We assume that tbm_union can be optimized away for BitmapIndexScan
|
||||
* subplans.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This must agree with cost_bitmap_qual in costsize.c.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
plan->startup_cost = 0;
|
||||
plan->total_cost = 0;
|
||||
plan->plan_rows = 0;
|
||||
plan->plan_width = 0; /* meaningless */
|
||||
foreach(subnode, bitmapplans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Plan *subplan = (Plan *) lfirst(subnode);
|
||||
|
||||
if (subnode == list_head(bitmapplans)) /* first node? */
|
||||
plan->startup_cost = subplan->startup_cost;
|
||||
else if (!IsA(subplan, BitmapIndexScan))
|
||||
plan->total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * 100.0;
|
||||
plan->total_cost += subplan->total_cost;
|
||||
plan->plan_rows += subplan->plan_rows; /* ignore overlap */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* cost should be inserted by caller */
|
||||
plan->targetlist = NIL;
|
||||
plan->qual = NIL;
|
||||
plan->lefttree = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c,v 1.117 2005/04/21 02:28:01 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c,v 1.118 2005/04/21 19:18:12 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -475,12 +475,12 @@ create_index_path(Query *root,
|
||||
* create_bitmap_heap_path
|
||||
* Creates a path node for a bitmap scan.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 'bitmapqual' is an AND/OR tree of IndexPath nodes.
|
||||
* 'bitmapqual' is a tree of IndexPath, BitmapAndPath, and BitmapOrPath nodes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BitmapHeapPath *
|
||||
create_bitmap_heap_path(Query *root,
|
||||
RelOptInfo *rel,
|
||||
Node *bitmapqual)
|
||||
Path *bitmapqual)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapHeapPath *pathnode = makeNode(BitmapHeapPath);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -499,7 +499,53 @@ create_bitmap_heap_path(Query *root,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pathnode->rows = rel->rows;
|
||||
|
||||
cost_bitmap_scan(&pathnode->path, root, rel, bitmapqual, false);
|
||||
cost_bitmap_heap_scan(&pathnode->path, root, rel, bitmapqual, false);
|
||||
|
||||
return pathnode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* create_bitmap_and_path
|
||||
* Creates a path node representing a BitmapAnd.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BitmapAndPath *
|
||||
create_bitmap_and_path(Query *root,
|
||||
RelOptInfo *rel,
|
||||
List *bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapAndPath *pathnode = makeNode(BitmapAndPath);
|
||||
|
||||
pathnode->path.pathtype = T_BitmapAnd;
|
||||
pathnode->path.parent = rel;
|
||||
pathnode->path.pathkeys = NIL; /* always unordered */
|
||||
|
||||
pathnode->bitmapquals = bitmapquals;
|
||||
|
||||
/* this sets bitmapselectivity as well as the regular cost fields: */
|
||||
cost_bitmap_and_node(pathnode, root);
|
||||
|
||||
return pathnode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* create_bitmap_or_path
|
||||
* Creates a path node representing a BitmapOr.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BitmapOrPath *
|
||||
create_bitmap_or_path(Query *root,
|
||||
RelOptInfo *rel,
|
||||
List *bitmapquals)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BitmapOrPath *pathnode = makeNode(BitmapOrPath);
|
||||
|
||||
pathnode->path.pathtype = T_BitmapOr;
|
||||
pathnode->path.parent = rel;
|
||||
pathnode->path.pathkeys = NIL; /* always unordered */
|
||||
|
||||
pathnode->bitmapquals = bitmapquals;
|
||||
|
||||
/* this sets bitmapselectivity as well as the regular cost fields: */
|
||||
cost_bitmap_or_node(pathnode, root);
|
||||
|
||||
return pathnode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user