mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-09-02 04:21:28 +03:00
tableam: Avoid relying on relation size to determine validity of tids.
Instead add a tableam callback to do so. To avoid adding per validation overhead, pass a scan to tuple_tid_valid. In heap's case we'd otherwise incurred a RelationGetNumberOfBlocks() call for each tid - which'd have added noticable overhead to nodeTidscan.c. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Ashwin Agrawal Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190515185447.gno2jtqxyktylyvs@alap3.anarazel.de
This commit is contained in:
@@ -213,6 +213,33 @@ table_index_fetch_tuple_check(Relation rel,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
* Functions for non-modifying operations on individual tuples
|
||||
* ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
table_get_latest_tid(TableScanDesc scan, ItemPointer tid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Relation rel = scan->rs_rd;
|
||||
const TableAmRoutine *tableam = rel->rd_tableam;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Since this can be called with user-supplied TID, don't trust the input
|
||||
* too much.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!tableam->tuple_tid_valid(scan, tid))
|
||||
ereport(ERROR,
|
||||
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
|
||||
errmsg("tid (%u, %u) is not valid for relation for relation \"%s\"",
|
||||
ItemPointerGetBlockNumberNoCheck(tid),
|
||||
ItemPointerGetOffsetNumberNoCheck(tid),
|
||||
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
|
||||
|
||||
return tableam->tuple_get_latest_tid(scan, tid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
* Functions to make modifications a bit simpler.
|
||||
* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user