From 1449770d31fd684a078865334a3a155a7ee534ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:17:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations. We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]" in the actual function definitions. Per C99 these are equivalent, but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about the inconsistency. Clean it up before the warnings get any more widespread. Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with bleeding-edge compilers. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us --- src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c index 0bca383ebe5..dccf39582da 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c +++ b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ rtoday(date * d) } int -rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3]) +rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy) { int mdy_int[3]; @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, const char *fmt, char *str) } int -rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d) +rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d) { int mdy_int[3];