Fix handling of R/W expanded datums that are passed to SQL functions.

fmgr_sql must make expanded-datum arguments read-only, because
it's possible that the function body will pass the argument to
more than one callee function.  If one of those functions takes
the datum's R/W property as license to scribble on it, then later
callees will see an unexpected value, leading to wrong answers.

From a performance standpoint, it'd be nice to skip this in the
common case that the argument value is passed to only one callee.
However, detecting that seems fairly hard, and certainly not
something that I care to attempt in a back-patched bug fix.

Per report from Adam Mackler.  This has been broken since we
invented expanded datums, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/WScDU5qfoZ7PB2gXwNqwGGgDPmWzz08VdydcPFLhOwUKZcdWbblbo-0Lku-qhuEiZoXJ82jpiQU4hOjOcrevYEDeoAvz6nR0IU4IHhXnaCA=@mackler.email
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/187436.1660143060@sss.pgh.pa.us

src/backend/executor/functions.c

@@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ postquel_sub_params(SQLFunctionCachePtr fcache,
 	if (nargs > 0)
 	{
 		ParamListInfo paramLI;
+		Oid		   *argtypes = fcache->pinfo->argtypes;
 		int			i;
 
 		if (fcache->paramLI == NULL)
@@ -928,10 +929,24 @@ postquel_sub_params(SQLFunctionCachePtr fcache,
 		{
 			ParamExternData *prm = &paramLI->params[i];
 
-			prm->value = fcinfo->arg[i];
+			/*
+			 * If an incoming parameter value is a R/W expanded datum, we
+			 * force it to R/O.  We'd be perfectly entitled to scribble on it,
+			 * but the problem is that if the parameter is referenced more
+			 * than once in the function, earlier references might mutate the
+			 * value seen by later references, which won't do at all.  We
+			 * could do better if we could be sure of the number of Param
+			 * nodes in the function's plans; but we might not have planned
+			 * all the statements yet, nor do we have plan tree walker
+			 * infrastructure.  (Examining the parse trees is not good enough,
+			 * because of possible function inlining during planning.)
+			 */
 			prm->isnull = fcinfo->argnull[i];
+			prm->value = MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly(fcinfo->arg[i],
+													prm->isnull,
+													get_typlen(argtypes[i]));
 			prm->pflags = 0;
-			prm->ptype = fcache->pinfo->argtypes[i];
+			prm->ptype = argtypes[i];
 		}
 	}
 	else

src/test/regress/expected/create_function_3.out

@@ -227,9 +227,25 @@ ERROR:  could not find a function named "functest_b_1"
 DROP FUNCTION functest_b_2;  -- error, ambiguous
 ERROR:  function name "functest_b_2" is not unique
 HINT:  Specify the argument list to select the function unambiguously.
--- Cleanups
+-- Regression tests for bugs:
+-- Check that arguments that are R/W expanded datums aren't corrupted by
+-- multiple uses.  This test knows that array_append() returns a R/W datum
+-- and will modify a R/W array input in-place.  We use SETOF to prevent
+-- inlining of the SQL function.
+CREATE FUNCTION double_append(anyarray, anyelement) RETURNS SETOF anyarray
+LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE AS
+$$ SELECT array_append($1, $2) || array_append($1, $2) $$;
+SELECT double_append(array_append(ARRAY[q1], q2), q3)
+  FROM (VALUES(1,2,3), (4,5,6)) v(q1,q2,q3);
+ double_append 
+---------------
+ {1,2,3,1,2,3}
+ {4,5,6,4,5,6}
+(2 rows)
+
+-- Cleanup
 DROP SCHEMA temp_func_test CASCADE;
-NOTICE:  drop cascades to 16 other objects
+NOTICE:  drop cascades to 17 other objects
 DETAIL:  drop cascades to function functest_a_1(text,date)
 drop cascades to function functest_a_2(text[])
 drop cascades to function functest_a_3()
@@ -246,5 +262,6 @@ drop cascades to function functext_f_2(integer)
 drop cascades to function functext_f_3(integer)
 drop cascades to function functext_f_4(integer)
 drop cascades to function functest_b_2(bigint)
+drop cascades to function double_append(anyarray,anyelement)
 DROP USER regress_unpriv_user;
 RESET search_path;

src/test/regress/sql/create_function_3.sql

@@ -166,8 +166,20 @@ DROP FUNCTION functest_b_1;
 DROP FUNCTION functest_b_1;  -- error, not found
 DROP FUNCTION functest_b_2;  -- error, ambiguous
 
+-- Regression tests for bugs:
 
--- Cleanups
+-- Check that arguments that are R/W expanded datums aren't corrupted by
+-- multiple uses.  This test knows that array_append() returns a R/W datum
+-- and will modify a R/W array input in-place.  We use SETOF to prevent
+-- inlining of the SQL function.
+CREATE FUNCTION double_append(anyarray, anyelement) RETURNS SETOF anyarray
+LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE AS
+$$ SELECT array_append($1, $2) || array_append($1, $2) $$;
+
+SELECT double_append(array_append(ARRAY[q1], q2), q3)
+  FROM (VALUES(1,2,3), (4,5,6)) v(q1,q2,q3);
+
+-- Cleanup
 DROP SCHEMA temp_func_test CASCADE;
 DROP USER regress_unpriv_user;
 RESET search_path;