1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-05-28 05:21:27 +03:00

Doc: improve description of window function processing.

The previous wording talked about a "single pass over the data",
which can be read as promising more than intended (to wit, that only
one WindowAgg plan node will be used).  What we promise is only what
the SQL spec requires, namely that the data not get re-sorted between
window functions with compatible PARTITION BY/ORDER BY clauses.
Adjust the wording in hopes of making this clearer.

Reported-by: Christopher Inokuchi <cinokuchi@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABde6B5va2wMsnM79u_x=n9KUgfKQje_pbLROEBmA9Ru5XWidw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2025-03-10 10:22:08 -04:00
parent 43847dd5e9
commit 0f27bd14e4

View File

@ -1461,10 +1461,10 @@ GROUP BY GROUPING SETS (
<para>
When multiple window functions are used, all the window functions having
syntactically equivalent <literal>PARTITION BY</literal> and <literal>ORDER BY</literal>
clauses in their window definitions are guaranteed to be evaluated in a
single pass over the data. Therefore they will see the same sort ordering,
even if the <literal>ORDER BY</literal> does not uniquely determine an ordering.
equivalent <literal>PARTITION BY</literal> and <literal>ORDER BY</literal>
clauses in their window definitions are guaranteed to see the same
ordering of the input rows, even if the <literal>ORDER BY</literal> does
not uniquely determine the ordering.
However, no guarantees are made about the evaluation of functions having
different <literal>PARTITION BY</literal> or <literal>ORDER BY</literal> specifications.
(In such cases a sort step is typically required between the passes of