mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-06-23 14:01:44 +03:00
Get rid of trailing semicolons in C macro definitions.
Writing a trailing semicolon in a macro is almost never the right thing, because you almost always want to write a semicolon after each macro call instead. (Even if there was some reason to prefer not to, pgindent would probably make a hash of code formatted that way; so within PG the rule should basically be "don't do it".) Thus, if we have a semi inside the macro, the compiler sees "something;;". Much of the time the extra empty statement is harmless, but it could lead to mysterious syntax errors at call sites. In perhaps an overabundance of neatnik-ism, let's run around and get rid of the excess semicolons whereever possible. The only thing worse than a mysterious syntax error is a mysterious syntax error that only happens in the back branches; therefore, backpatch these changes where relevant, which is most of them because most of these mistakes are old. (The lack of reported problems shows that this is largely a hypothetical issue, but still, it could bite us in some future patch.) John Naylor and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCs0qWTqJ2QUSGJ07B7uvAvzMb-KbG2q+oo+J3tsWN5cqw@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
@ -341,12 +341,13 @@ gbt_ts_union(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#define penalty_check_max_float(val) do { \
|
||||
#define penalty_check_max_float(val) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
if ( val > FLT_MAX ) \
|
||||
val = FLT_MAX; \
|
||||
if ( val < -FLT_MAX ) \
|
||||
val = -FLT_MAX; \
|
||||
} while(false);
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Datum
|
||||
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ typedef struct
|
||||
(*(result)) += (float) ( ((double)(tmp)) / ( (double)(tmp) + ( ((double)(oupper))*0.49F - ((double)(olower))*0.49F ) ) ); \
|
||||
(*(result)) *= (FLT_MAX / (((GISTENTRY *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0))->rel->rd_att->natts + 1)); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
} while (0);
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ typedef char trgm[3];
|
||||
*(((char*)(a))+0) = *(((char*)(b))+0); \
|
||||
*(((char*)(a))+1) = *(((char*)(b))+1); \
|
||||
*(((char*)(a))+2) = *(((char*)(b))+2); \
|
||||
} while(0);
|
||||
} while(0)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef KEEPONLYALNUM
|
||||
#define ISWORDCHR(c) (t_isalpha(c) || t_isdigit(c))
|
||||
|
@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ BF_swap(BF_word *x, int count)
|
||||
tmp3 ^= tmp2; \
|
||||
(R) ^= data.ctx.P[(N) + 1]; \
|
||||
tmp3 += tmp1; \
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3;
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/* Architectures with no complicated addressing modes supported */
|
||||
#define BF_INDEX(S, i) \
|
||||
@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ BF_swap(BF_word *x, int count)
|
||||
tmp3 ^= tmp2; \
|
||||
(R) ^= data.ctx.P[(N) + 1]; \
|
||||
tmp3 += tmp1; \
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3;
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -516,17 +516,18 @@ BF_swap(BF_word *x, int count)
|
||||
BF_ROUND(R, L, 15); \
|
||||
tmp4 = R; \
|
||||
R = L; \
|
||||
L = tmp4 ^ data.ctx.P[BF_N + 1];
|
||||
L = tmp4 ^ data.ctx.P[BF_N + 1]
|
||||
|
||||
#if BF_ASM
|
||||
|
||||
extern void _BF_body_r(BF_ctx *ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
#define BF_body() \
|
||||
_BF_body_r(&data.ctx);
|
||||
_BF_body_r(&data.ctx)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
||||
#define BF_body() \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
L = R = 0; \
|
||||
ptr = data.ctx.P; \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
@ -542,7 +543,8 @@ extern void _BF_body_r(BF_ctx *ctx);
|
||||
BF_ENCRYPT; \
|
||||
*(ptr - 2) = L; \
|
||||
*(ptr - 1) = R; \
|
||||
} while (ptr < &data.ctx.S[3][0xFF]);
|
||||
} while (ptr < &data.ctx.S[3][0xFF]); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user