1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-09-05 02:22:28 +03:00

Improve performance of regular expression back-references.

In some cases, at the time that we're doing an NFA-based precheck
of whether a backref subexpression can match at a particular place
in the string, we already know which substring the referenced
subexpression matched.  If so, we might as well forget about the NFA
and just compare the substring; this is faster and it gives an exact
rather than approximate answer.

In general, this optimization can help while we are prechecking within
the second child expression of a concat node, while the capture was
within the first child expression; then the substring was saved during
cdissect() of the first child and will be available to NFA checks done
while cdissect() recurses into the second child.  It can help quite a
lot if the tree looks like

              concat
             /      \
      capture        concat
                    /      \
     expensive stuff        backref

as we will be able to avoid recursively dissecting the "expensive
stuff" before discovering that the backref isn't satisfied with a
particular midpoint that the lower concat node is testing.  This
doesn't help if the concat tree is left-deep, as the capture node
won't get set soon enough (and it's hard to fix that without changing
the engine's match behavior).  Fortunately, right-deep concat trees
are the common case.

Patch by me, reviewed by Joel Jacobson

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/661609.1614560029@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2021-03-02 11:55:12 -05:00
parent 4aea704a5b
commit 0c3405cf11
2 changed files with 138 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ struct dfa
chr *lastpost; /* location of last cache-flushed success */
chr *lastnopr; /* location of last cache-flushed NOPROGRESS */
struct sset *search; /* replacement-search-pointer memory */
int backno; /* if DFA for a backref, subno it refers to */
short backmin; /* min repetitions for backref */
short backmax; /* max repetitions for backref */
bool ismalloced; /* should this struct dfa be freed? */
bool arraysmalloced; /* should its subsidiary arrays be freed? */
};
@@ -154,6 +157,7 @@ static int creviterdissect(struct vars *, struct subre *, chr *, chr *);
static chr *longest(struct vars *, struct dfa *, chr *, chr *, int *);
static chr *shortest(struct vars *, struct dfa *, chr *, chr *, chr *, chr **, int *);
static int matchuntil(struct vars *, struct dfa *, chr *, struct sset **, chr **);
static chr *dfa_backref(struct vars *, struct dfa *, chr *, chr *, chr *, bool);
static chr *lastcold(struct vars *, struct dfa *);
static struct dfa *newdfa(struct vars *, struct cnfa *, struct colormap *, struct smalldfa *);
static void freedfa(struct dfa *);
@@ -342,13 +346,23 @@ static struct dfa *
getsubdfa(struct vars *v,
struct subre *t)
{
if (v->subdfas[t->id] == NULL)
struct dfa *d = v->subdfas[t->id];
if (d == NULL)
{
v->subdfas[t->id] = newdfa(v, &t->cnfa, &v->g->cmap, DOMALLOC);
d = newdfa(v, &t->cnfa, &v->g->cmap, DOMALLOC);
if (ISERR())
return NULL;
/* set up additional info if this is a backref node */
if (t->op == 'b')
{
d->backno = t->backno;
d->backmin = t->min;
d->backmax = t->max;
}
v->subdfas[t->id] = d;
}
return v->subdfas[t->id];
return d;
}
/*
@@ -369,6 +383,7 @@ getladfa(struct vars *v,
v->ladfas[n] = newdfa(v, &sub->cnfa, &v->g->cmap, DOMALLOC);
if (ISERR())
return NULL;
/* a LACON can't contain a backref, so nothing else to do */
}
return v->ladfas[n];
}
@@ -927,6 +942,9 @@ crevcondissect(struct vars *v,
/*
* cbrdissect - dissect match for backref node
*
* The backref match might already have been verified by dfa_backref(),
* but we don't know that for sure so must check it here.
*/
static int /* regexec return code */
cbrdissect(struct vars *v,