Remove tabs after spaces in C comments

This was not changed in HEAD, but will be done later as part of a
pgindent run.  Future pgindent runs will also do this.

Report by Tom Lane

Backpatch through all supported branches, but not HEAD

src/backend/access/gist/gist.c

@@ -1372,7 +1372,7 @@ initGISTstate(Relation index)
 		/*
 		 * If the index column has a specified collation, we should honor that
 		 * while doing comparisons.  However, we may have a collatable storage
-		 * type for a noncollatable indexed data type.	If there's no index
+		 * type for a noncollatable indexed data type.  If there's no index
 		 * collation then specify default collation in case the support
 		 * functions need collation.  This is harmless if the support
 		 * functions don't care about collation, so we just do it

src/backend/access/gist/gistget.c

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
  *
  * On success return for a heap tuple, *recheck_p is set to indicate
  * whether recheck is needed.  We recheck if any of the consistent() functions
- * request it.	recheck is not interesting when examining a non-leaf entry,
+ * request it.  recheck is not interesting when examining a non-leaf entry,
  * since we must visit the lower index page if there's any doubt.
  *
  * If we are doing an ordered scan, so->distances[] is filled with distance
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ gistindex_keytest(IndexScanDesc scan,
 
 	/*
 	 * If it's a leftover invalid tuple from pre-9.1, treat it as a match with
-	 * minimum possible distances.	This means we'll always follow it to the
+	 * minimum possible distances.  This means we'll always follow it to the
 	 * referenced page.
 	 */
 	if (GistTupleIsInvalid(tuple))
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ gistindex_keytest(IndexScanDesc scan,
  * ntids: if not NULL, gistgetbitmap's output tuple counter
  *
  * If tbm/ntids aren't NULL, we are doing an amgetbitmap scan, and heap
- * tuples should be reported directly into the bitmap.	If they are NULL,
+ * tuples should be reported directly into the bitmap.  If they are NULL,
  * we're doing a plain or ordered indexscan.  For a plain indexscan, heap
  * tuple TIDs are returned into so->pageData[].  For an ordered indexscan,
  * heap tuple TIDs are pushed into individual search queue items.

src/backend/access/gist/gistscan.c

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ GISTSearchTreeItemCombiner(RBNode *existing, const RBNode *newrb, void *arg)
 	/*
 	 * If new item is heap tuple, it goes to front of chain; otherwise insert
 	 * it before the first index-page item, so that index pages are visited in
-	 * LIFO order, ensuring depth-first search of index pages.	See comments
+	 * LIFO order, ensuring depth-first search of index pages.  See comments
 	 * in gist_private.h.
 	 */
 	if (GISTSearchItemIsHeap(*newitem))

src/backend/access/gist/gistsplit.c

@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ gistunionsubkeyvec(GISTSTATE *giststate, IndexTuple *itvec,
  * Recompute unions of left- and right-side subkeys after a page split,
  * ignoring any tuples that are marked in spl->spl_dontcare[].
  *
- * Note: we always recompute union keys for all index columns.	In some cases
+ * Note: we always recompute union keys for all index columns.  In some cases
  * this might represent duplicate work for the leftmost column(s), but it's
  * not safe to assume that "zero penalty to move a tuple" means "the union
  * key doesn't change at all".  Penalty functions aren't 100% accurate.
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ findDontCares(Relation r, GISTSTATE *giststate, GISTENTRY *valvec,
 
 /*
  * Remove tuples that are marked don't-cares from the tuple index array a[]
- * of length *len.	This is applied separately to the spl_left and spl_right
+ * of length *len.  This is applied separately to the spl_left and spl_right
  * arrays.
  */
 static void
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ removeDontCares(OffsetNumber *a, int *len, const bool *dontcare)
 /*
  * Place a single don't-care tuple into either the left or right side of the
  * split, according to which has least penalty for merging the tuple into
- * the previously-computed union keys.	We need consider only columns starting
+ * the previously-computed union keys.  We need consider only columns starting
  * at attno.
  */
 static void
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ supportSecondarySplit(Relation r, GISTSTATE *giststate, int attno,
 
 		/*
 		 * There is only one previously defined union, so we just choose swap
-		 * or not by lowest penalty for that side.	We can only get here if a
+		 * or not by lowest penalty for that side.  We can only get here if a
 		 * secondary split happened to have all NULLs in its column in the
 		 * tuples that the outer recursion level had assigned to one side.
 		 * (Note that the null checks in gistSplitByKey don't prevent the
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ gistUserPicksplit(Relation r, GistEntryVector *entryvec, int attno, GistSplitVec
 	sv->spl_rdatum = v->spl_rattr[attno];
 
 	/*
-	 * Let the opclass-specific PickSplit method do its thing.	Note that at
+	 * Let the opclass-specific PickSplit method do its thing.  Note that at
 	 * this point we know there are no null keys in the entryvec.
 	 */
 	FunctionCall2Coll(&giststate->picksplitFn[attno],

src/backend/access/gist/gistutil.c

@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ gistchoose(Relation r, Page p, IndexTuple it,	/* it has compressed entry */
 			{
 				/*
 				 * New best penalty for column.  Tentatively select this tuple
-				 * as the target, and record the best penalty.	Then reset the
+				 * as the target, and record the best penalty.  Then reset the
 				 * next column's penalty to "unknown" (and indirectly, the
 				 * same for all the ones to its right).  This will force us to
 				 * adopt this tuple's penalty values as the best for all the
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ gistchoose(Relation r, Page p, IndexTuple it,	/* it has compressed entry */
 			{
 				/*
 				 * The current tuple is exactly as good for this column as the
-				 * best tuple seen so far.	The next iteration of this loop
+				 * best tuple seen so far.  The next iteration of this loop
 				 * will compare the next column.
 				 */
 			}
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ gistcheckpage(Relation rel, Buffer buf)
 	/*
 	 * ReadBuffer verifies that every newly-read page passes
 	 * PageHeaderIsValid, which means it either contains a reasonably sane
-	 * page header or is all-zero.	We have to defend against the all-zero
+	 * page header or is all-zero.  We have to defend against the all-zero
 	 * case, however.
 	 */
 	if (PageIsNew(page))

src/backend/access/gist/gistvacuum.c

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ gistvacuumcleanup(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 		stats->estimated_count = info->estimated_count;
 
 		/*
-		 * XXX the above is wrong if index is partial.	Would it be OK to just
+		 * XXX the above is wrong if index is partial.  Would it be OK to just
 		 * return NULL, or is there work we must do below?
 		 */
 	}