mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-06-14 18:42:34 +03:00
pgindent run for 9.4
This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
This commit is contained in:
@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ ri_restrict_del(TriggerData *trigdata, bool is_no_action)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If another PK row now exists providing the old key values, we
|
||||
* should not do anything. However, this check should only be
|
||||
* should not do anything. However, this check should only be
|
||||
* made in the NO ACTION case; in RESTRICT cases we don't wish to
|
||||
* allow another row to be substituted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ ri_restrict_upd(TriggerData *trigdata, bool is_no_action)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If another PK row now exists providing the old key values, we
|
||||
* should not do anything. However, this check should only be
|
||||
* should not do anything. However, this check should only be
|
||||
* made in the NO ACTION case; in RESTRICT cases we don't wish to
|
||||
* allow another row to be substituted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -1850,7 +1850,7 @@ RI_FKey_setdefault_del(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
* believe no check is necessary. So we need to do another lookup
|
||||
* now and in case a reference still exists, abort the operation.
|
||||
* That is already implemented in the NO ACTION trigger, so just
|
||||
* run it. (This recheck is only needed in the SET DEFAULT case,
|
||||
* run it. (This recheck is only needed in the SET DEFAULT case,
|
||||
* since CASCADE would remove such rows, while SET NULL is certain
|
||||
* to result in rows that satisfy the FK constraint.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -2041,7 +2041,7 @@ RI_FKey_setdefault_upd(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
* believe no check is necessary. So we need to do another lookup
|
||||
* now and in case a reference still exists, abort the operation.
|
||||
* That is already implemented in the NO ACTION trigger, so just
|
||||
* run it. (This recheck is only needed in the SET DEFAULT case,
|
||||
* run it. (This recheck is only needed in the SET DEFAULT case,
|
||||
* since CASCADE must change the FK key values, while SET NULL is
|
||||
* certain to result in rows that satisfy the FK constraint.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -2397,7 +2397,7 @@ RI_Initial_Check(Trigger *trigger, Relation fk_rel, Relation pk_rel)
|
||||
* Temporarily increase work_mem so that the check query can be executed
|
||||
* more efficiently. It seems okay to do this because the query is simple
|
||||
* enough to not use a multiple of work_mem, and one typically would not
|
||||
* have many large foreign-key validations happening concurrently. So
|
||||
* have many large foreign-key validations happening concurrently. So
|
||||
* this seems to meet the criteria for being considered a "maintenance"
|
||||
* operation, and accordingly we use maintenance_work_mem.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -2451,7 +2451,7 @@ RI_Initial_Check(Trigger *trigger, Relation fk_rel, Relation pk_rel)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The columns to look at in the result tuple are 1..N, not whatever
|
||||
* they are in the fk_rel. Hack up riinfo so that the subroutines
|
||||
* they are in the fk_rel. Hack up riinfo so that the subroutines
|
||||
* called here will behave properly.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In addition to this, we have to pass the correct tupdesc to
|
||||
@ -3180,7 +3180,7 @@ ri_ReportViolation(const RI_ConstraintInfo *riinfo,
|
||||
errhint("This is most likely due to a rule having rewritten the query.")));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Determine which relation to complain about. If tupdesc wasn't passed
|
||||
* Determine which relation to complain about. If tupdesc wasn't passed
|
||||
* by caller, assume the violator tuple came from there.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
onfk = (queryno == RI_PLAN_CHECK_LOOKUPPK);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user