Ignore nextOid when replaying an ONLINE checkpoint.

The nextOid value is from the start of the checkpoint and may well be stale
compared to values from more recent XLOG_NEXTOID records.  Previously, we
adopted it anyway, allowing the OID counter to go backwards during a crash.
While this should be harmless, it contributed to the severity of the bug
fixed in commit 0408e1ed5, by allowing duplicate TOAST OIDs to be assigned
immediately following a crash.  Without this error, that issue would only
have arisen when TOAST objects just younger than a multiple of 2^32 OIDs
were deleted and then not vacuumed in time to avoid a conflict.

Pavan Deolasee

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdOgWT2hHkYG3Wwo2cyZJq2zfs1FH0FgX-=h4OLosXHf9w@mail.gmail.com

src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c

@@ -9420,11 +9420,20 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
 								  checkPoint.nextXid))
 			ShmemVariableCache->nextXid = checkPoint.nextXid;
 		LWLockRelease(XidGenLock);
-		/* ... but still treat OID counter as exact */
+
-		LWLockAcquire(OidGenLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+		/*
-		ShmemVariableCache->nextOid = checkPoint.nextOid;
+		 * We ignore the nextOid counter in an ONLINE checkpoint, preferring
-		ShmemVariableCache->oidCount = 0;
+		 * to track OID assignment through XLOG_NEXTOID records.  The nextOid
-		LWLockRelease(OidGenLock);
+		 * counter is from the start of the checkpoint and might well be stale
+		 * compared to later XLOG_NEXTOID records.  We could try to take the
+		 * maximum of the nextOid counter and our latest value, but since
+		 * there's no particular guarantee about the speed with which the OID
+		 * counter wraps around, that's a risky thing to do.  In any case,
+		 * users of the nextOid counter are required to avoid assignment of
+		 * duplicates, so that a somewhat out-of-date value should be safe.
+		 */
+
+		/* Handle multixact */
 		MultiXactAdvanceNextMXact(checkPoint.nextMulti,
 								  checkPoint.nextMultiOffset);