1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-03 20:02:46 +03:00

Be more tense about not creating tuplestores with randomAccess = true unless

backwards scan could actually happen.  In particular, pass a flag to
materialize-mode SRFs that tells them whether they need to require random
access.  In passing, also suppress unneeded backward-scan overhead for a
Portal's holdStore tuplestore.  Per my proposal about reducing I/O costs for
tuplestores.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2008-10-29 00:00:39 +00:00
parent e3e3d2a789
commit 05bba3d176
11 changed files with 67 additions and 31 deletions

View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
* Copyright (c) 2002-2008, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/commands/prepare.c,v 1.91 2008/08/28 23:09:45 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/commands/prepare.c,v 1.92 2008/10/29 00:00:38 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -766,7 +766,9 @@ pg_prepared_statement(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
* We put all the tuples into a tuplestore in one scan of the hashtable.
* This avoids any issue of the hashtable possibly changing between calls.
*/
tupstore = tuplestore_begin_heap(true, false, work_mem);
tupstore =
tuplestore_begin_heap(rsinfo->allowedModes & SFRM_Materialize_Random,
false, work_mem);
/* hash table might be uninitialized */
if (prepared_queries)