mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-30 11:03:19 +03:00
Add GUC enable_partition_pruning
This controls both plan-time and execution-time new-style partition pruning. While finer-grain control is possible (maybe using an enum GUC instead of boolean), there doesn't seem to be much need for that. This new parameter controls partition pruning for all queries: trivially, SELECT queries that affect partitioned tables are naturally under its control since they are using the new technology. However, while UPDATE/DELETE queries do not use the new code, we make the new GUC control their behavior also (stealing control from constraint_exclusion), because it is more natural, and it leads to a more natural transition to the future in which those queries will also use the new pruning code. Constraint exclusion still controls pruning for regular inheritance situations (those not involving partitioned tables). Author: David Rowley Review: Amit Langote, Ashutosh Bapat, Justin Pryzby, David G. Johnston Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f_0HwsxJG9m+nzU+CizxSdGtfe6iF_ykPYBiYft302DCw@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
@ -3826,6 +3826,23 @@ ANY <replaceable class="parameter">num_sync</replaceable> ( <replaceable class="
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry id="guc-enable-partition-pruning" xreflabel="enable_partition_pruning">
|
||||
<term><varname>enable_partition_pruning</varname> (<type>boolean</type>)
|
||||
<indexterm>
|
||||
<primary><varname>enable_partition_pruning</varname> configuration parameter</primary>
|
||||
</indexterm>
|
||||
</term>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Enables or disables the query planner's ability to eliminate a
|
||||
partitioned table's partitions from query plans. This also controls
|
||||
the planner's ability to generate query plans which allow the query
|
||||
executor to remove (ignore) partitions during query execution. The
|
||||
default is <literal>on</literal>.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
||||
<varlistentry id="guc-enable-partitionwise-join" xreflabel="enable_partitionwise_join">
|
||||
<term><varname>enable_partitionwise_join</varname> (<type>boolean</type>)
|
||||
<indexterm>
|
||||
@ -4417,8 +4434,7 @@ ANY <replaceable class="parameter">num_sync</replaceable> ( <replaceable class="
|
||||
<literal>partition</literal> (examine constraints only for inheritance child
|
||||
tables and <literal>UNION ALL</literal> subqueries).
|
||||
<literal>partition</literal> is the default setting.
|
||||
It is often used with inheritance and partitioned tables to
|
||||
improve performance.
|
||||
It is often used with inheritance tables to improve performance.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
@ -4441,11 +4457,11 @@ SELECT * FROM parent WHERE key = 2400;
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Currently, constraint exclusion is enabled by default
|
||||
only for cases that are often used to implement table partitioning.
|
||||
Turning it on for all tables imposes extra planning overhead that is
|
||||
quite noticeable on simple queries, and most often will yield no
|
||||
benefit for simple queries. If you have no partitioned tables
|
||||
you might prefer to turn it off entirely.
|
||||
only for cases that are often used to implement table partitioning via
|
||||
inheritance tables. Turning it on for all tables imposes extra
|
||||
planning overhead that is quite noticeable on simple queries, and most
|
||||
often will yield no benefit for simple queries. If you have no
|
||||
inheritance partitioned tables you might prefer to turn it off entirely.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
|
@ -3196,7 +3196,7 @@ CREATE INDEX ON measurement (logdate);
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Ensure that the <xref linkend="guc-constraint-exclusion"/>
|
||||
Ensure that the <xref linkend="guc-enable-partition-pruning"/>
|
||||
configuration parameter is not disabled in <filename>postgresql.conf</filename>.
|
||||
If it is, queries will not be optimized as desired.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user