From 01ddd2f7e411ba434473faebf00f5b5af84c0f64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 09:01:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Make terminology in glossary consistent Use "reside in" rather than "belong to" for objects in a schema. Previous use was a mix of the two. Author: Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202106021932.idmbjjaqk7ke@alvherre.pgsql --- doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml index 41f3e5ee86b..c8d0440e80f 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ known as local objects. - Most local objects belong to a specific + Most local objects reside in a specific schema in their containing database, such as relations (all types), @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ are enforced to be unique. - There also exist local objects that do not belong to schemas; some examples are + There also exist local objects that do not reside in schemas; some examples are extensions, data type casts, and foreign data wrappers.