mirror of
https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git
synced 2025-05-20 13:13:59 +03:00
bd4153a8c2
replication causing replication to fail. Remove the temporary fix for MDEV-5914, which used READ COMMITTED for parallel replication worker threads. Replace it with a better, more selective solution. The issue is with certain edge cases of InnoDB gap locks, for example between INSERT and ranged DELETE. It is possible for the gap lock set by the DELETE to block the INSERT, if the DELETE runs first, while the record lock set by INSERT does not block the DELETE, if the INSERT runs first. This can cause a conflict between the two in parallel replication on the slave even though they ran without conflicts on the master. With this patch, InnoDB will ask the server layer about the two involved transactions before blocking on a gap lock. If the server layer tells InnoDB that the transactions are already fixed wrt. commit order, as they are in parallel replication, InnoDB will ignore the gap lock and allow the two transactions to proceed in parallel, avoiding the conflict. Improve the fix for MDEV-6020. When InnoDB itself detects a deadlock, it now asks the server layer for any preferences about which transaction to roll back. In case of parallel replication with two transactions T1 and T2 fixed to commit T1 before T2, the server layer will ask InnoDB to roll back T2 as the deadlock victim, not T1. This helps in some cases to avoid excessive deadlock rollback, as T2 will in any case need to wait for T1 to complete before it can itself commit. Also some misc. fixes found during development and testing: - Remove thd_rpl_is_parallel(), it is not used or needed. - Use KILL_CONNECTION instead of KILL_QUERY when a parallel replication worker thread is killed to resolve a deadlock with fixed commit ordering. There are some cases, eg. in sql/sql_parse.cc, where a KILL_QUERY can be ignored if the query otherwise completed successfully, and this could cause the deadlock kill to be lost, so that the deadlock was not correctly resolved. - Fix random test failure due to missing wait_for_binlog_checkpoint.inc. - Make sure that deadlock or other temporary errors during parallel replication are not printed to the the error log; there were some places around the replication code with extra error logging. These conditions can occur occasionally and are handled automatically without breaking replication, so they should not pollute the error log. - Fix handling of rgi->gtid_sub_id. We need to be able to access this also at the end of a transaction, to be able to detect and resolve deadlocks due to commit ordering. But this value was also used as a flag to mark whether record_gtid() had been called, by being set to zero, losing the value. Now, introduce a separate flag rgi->gtid_pending, so rgi->gtid_sub_id remains valid for the entire duration of the transaction. - Fix one place where the code to handle ignored errors called reset_killed() unconditionally, even if no error was caught that should be ignored. This could cause loss of a deadlock kill signal, breaking deadlock detection and resolution. - Fix a couple of missing mysql_reset_thd_for_next_command(). This could cause a prior error condition to remain for the next event executed, causing assertions about errors already being set and possibly giving incorrect error handling for following event executions. - Fix code that cleared thd->rgi_slave in the parallel replication worker threads after each event execution; this caused the deadlock detection and handling code to not be able to correctly process the associated transactions as belonging to replication worker threads. - Remove useless error code in slave_background_kill_request(). - Fix bug where wfc->wakeup_error was not cleared at wait_for_commit::unregister_wait_for_prior_commit(). This could cause the error condition to wrongly propagate to a later wait_for_prior_commit(), causing spurious ER_PRIOR_COMMIT_FAILED errors. - Do not put the binlog background thread into the processlist. It causes too many result differences in mtr, but also it probably is not useful for users to pollute the process list with a system thread that does not really perform any user-visible tasks...
This directory contains a test suite for the MySQL daemon. To run the currently existing test cases, simply execute ./mysql-test-run in this directory. It will fire up the newly built mysqld and test it. Note that you do not have to have to do "make install", and you could actually have a co-existing MySQL installation. The tests will not conflict with it. To run the test suite in a source directory, you must do make first. All tests must pass. If one or more of them fail on your system, please read the following manual section for instructions on how to report the problem: http://kb.askmonty.org/v/reporting-bugs If you want to use an already running MySQL server for specific tests, use the --extern option to mysql-test-run. Please note that in this mode, the test suite expects you to provide the names of the tests to run. For example, here is the command to run the "alias" and "analyze" tests with an external server: mysql-test-run --extern socket=/tmp/mysql.sock alias analyze To match your setup, you might also need to provide --socket, --user, and other relevant options. With no test cases named on the command line, mysql-test-run falls back to the normal "non-extern" behavior. The reason for this is that some tests cannot run with an external server. You can create your own test cases. To create a test case, create a new file in the t subdirectory using a text editor. The file should have a .test extension. For example: xemacs t/test_case_name.test In the file, put a set of SQL statements that create some tables, load test data, and run some queries to manipulate it. We would appreciate it if you name your test tables t1, t2, t3 ... (to not conflict too much with existing tables). Your test should begin by dropping the tables you are going to create and end by dropping them again. This ensures that you can run the test over and over again. If you are using mysqltest commands (like result file names) in your test case, you should create the result file as follows: mysql-test-run --record test_case_name or mysqltest --record < t/test_case_name.test If you only have a simple test cases consisting of SQL statements and comments, you can create the test case in one of the following ways: mysql-test-run --record test_case_name mysql test < t/test_case_name.test > r/test_case_name.result mysqltest --record --database test --result-file=r/test_case_name.result < t/test_case_name.test When this is done, take a look at r/test_case_name.result - If the result is incorrect, you have found a bug. In this case, you should edit the test result to the correct results so that we can verify that the bug is corrected in future releases. If you want to submit your test case you can send it to maria-developers@lists.launchpad.com or attach it to a bug report on http://mariadb.org/jira/. If the test case is really big or if it contains 'not public' data, then put your .test file and .result file(s) into a tar.gz archive, add a README that explains the problem, ftp the archive to ftp://ftp.askmonty.org/private and submit a report to http://mariadb.org/jira about it.