database/mariadb
database/mariadb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-05-04 06:05:05 +03:00
Code
mariadb/mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql_lock2.test
Dmitry Lenev ae1ae4bd63 Fix for bug #51263 "Deadlock between transactional 
SELECT and ALTER TABLE ...  REBUILD PARTITION".

ALTER TABLE on InnoDB table (including partitioned tables)
acquired exclusive locks on rows of table being altered.
In cases when there was concurrent transaction which did
locking reads from this table this sometimes led to a
deadlock which was not detected by MDL subsystem nor by
InnoDB engine (and was reported only after exceeding
innodb_lock_wait_timeout).

This problem stemmed from the fact that ALTER TABLE acquired
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock on table being altered. This lock
was interpreted as a write lock and thus for table being
altered handler::external_lock() method was called with
F_WRLCK as an argument. As result InnoDB engine treated
ALTER TABLE as an operation which is going to change data
and acquired LOCK_X locks on rows being read from old
version of table.

In case when there was a transaction which already acquired
SR metadata lock on table and some LOCK_S locks on its rows
(e.g. by using it in subquery of DML statement) concurrent
ALTER TABLE was blocked at the moment when it tried to
acquire LOCK_X lock before reading one of these rows.
The transaction's attempt to acquire SW metadata lock on
table being altered led to deadlock, since it had to wait
for ALTER TABLE to release SNW lock. This deadlock was not
detected and got resolved only after timeout expiring
because waiting were happening in two different subsystems.

Similar deadlocks could have occured in other situations.
This patch tries to solve the problem by changing ALTER TABLE
implementation to use TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock instead of
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ. After this step handler::external_lock()
is called with F_RDLCK as an argument and InnoDB engine
correctly interprets ALTER TABLE as operation which only
reads data from original version of table. Thanks to this
ALTER TABLE acquires only LOCK_S locks on rows it reads.
This, in its turn, causes inter-subsystem deadlocks to go
away, as all potential lock conflicts and thus deadlocks will
be limited to metadata locking subsystem:

- When ALTER TABLE reads rows from table being altered it
  can't encounter any locks which conflict with LOCK_S row
  locks. There should be no concurrent transactions holding
  LOCK_X row locks. Such a transaction should have been
  acquired SW metadata lock on table first which would have
  conflicted with ALTER's SNW lock.
- Vice versa, when DML which runs concurrently with ALTER
  TABLE tries to lock row it should be requesting only LOCK_S
  lock which is compatible with locks acquired by ALTER,
  as otherwise such DML must own an SW metadata lock on table
  which would be incompatible with ALTER's SNW lock.

mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql_lock2.result:
  Added test for bug #51263 "Deadlock between transactional
  SELECT and ALTER TABLE ... REBUILD PARTITION".
mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_binlog_format_errors.result:
  Since CREATE TRIGGER no longer acquires write lock on table
  it is no longer interpreted as an operation which modifies
  table data and therefore no longer fails if invoked for
  SBR-only engine in ROW mode.
mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/t/rpl_ndb_binlog_format_errors.test:
  Since CREATE TRIGGER no longer acquires write lock on table
  it is no longer interpreted as an operation which modifies
  table data and therefore no longer fails if invoked for
  SBR-only engine in ROW mode.
mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql_lock2.test:
  Added test for bug #51263 "Deadlock between transactional
  SELECT and ALTER TABLE ... REBUILD PARTITION".
sql/ha_partition.cc:
  When ALTER TABLE creates a new partition to be filled from
  other partition lock it in F_WRLCK mode instead of using
  mode which was used for locking the whole table (it is
  F_RDLCK now).
sql/lock.cc:
  Replaced conditions which used TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
  lock type with equivalent conditions using
  TL_WRITE_ALLOW_WRITE. This should allow to get rid
  of TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock type eventually.
sql/mdl.cc:
  Updated outdated comment to reflect current situation.
sql/sql_base.cc:
  Replaced conditions which used TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
  lock type with equivalent conditions using
  TL_WRITE_ALLOW_WRITE. This should allow to get rid
  of TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock type eventually.
sql/sql_table.cc:
  mysql_admin_table():
    Use TL_WRITE_ALLOW_WRITE lock type instead of
    TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ to determine that we need to acquire
    upgradable metadata lock. This should allow to completely
    get rid of TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ in long term.
  mysql_recreate_table():
    ALTER TABLE now requires TL_READ_NO_INSERT thr_lock.c lock
    instead of TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ.
sql/sql_trigger.cc:
  Changed CREATE/DROP TRIGGER implementation to use
  TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock instead of TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock.
  The latter is no longer necessary since:
  a) We now can rely on metadata locks to achieve proper
     isolation between two DDL statements or DDL and DML
     statements.
  b) This statement does not change any data in table so there
     is no need to inform storage engine about it.
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
  Changed implementation of ALTER TABLE (and CREATE/DROP INDEX
  as a consequence) to use TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock instead of
  TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock. This is possible since:
  a) We now can rely on metadata locks to achieve proper
     isolation between two DDL statements or DDL and DML
     statements.
  b) This statement only reads data in table being open.
     We write data only to the new version of table and
     then replace with it old version of table under
     X metadata lock.
  
  Thanks to this change InnoDB will no longer acquire LOCK_X
  locks on rows being read by ALTER TABLE (instead LOCK_S
  locks will be acquired) and thus cause of bug #51263
  "Deadlock between transactional SELECT and ALTER TABLE ...
  REBUILD PARTITION" is removed.
  
  Did the similar change for CREATE TRIGGER (see comments
  for sql_trigger.cc for details).
2010-05-26 16:18:08 +04:00

869 lines
29 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

# This test covers behavior for InnoDB tables.
--source include/have_innodb.inc
# This test requires statement/mixed mode binary logging.
# Row-based mode puts weaker serializability requirements
# so weaker locks are acquired for it.
# Also in ROW mode LOCK_S row locks won't be acquired for DML
# and test for bug#51263 won't trigger execution path on which
# this bug was encountered.
--source include/have_binlog_format_mixed_or_statement.inc
# Original test case for bug#51263 needs partitioning.
--source include/have_partition.inc
# Save the initial number of concurrent sessions.
--source include/count_sessions.inc
--echo #
--echo # Test how do we handle locking in various cases when
--echo # we read data from InnoDB tables.
--echo #
--echo # In fact by performing this test we check two things:
--echo # 1) That SQL-layer correctly determine type of thr_lock.c
--echo # lock to be acquired/passed to InnoDB engine.
--echo # 2) That InnoDB engine correctly interprets this lock
--echo # type and takes necessary row locks or does not
--echo # take them if they are not necessary.
--echo #
--echo # This test makes sense only in REPEATABLE-READ mode as
--echo # in SERIALIZABLE mode all statements that read data take
--echo # shared lock on them to enforce its semantics.
select @@session.tx_isolation;
--echo # Prepare playground by creating tables, views,
--echo # routines and triggers used in tests.
connect (con1, localhost, root,,);
connection default;
--disable_warnings
drop table if exists t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5;
drop view if exists v1, v2;
drop procedure if exists p1;
drop procedure if exists p2;
drop function if exists f1;
drop function if exists f2;
drop function if exists f3;
drop function if exists f4;
drop function if exists f5;
drop function if exists f6;
drop function if exists f7;
drop function if exists f8;
drop function if exists f9;
drop function if exists f10;
drop function if exists f11;
drop function if exists f12;
drop function if exists f13;
drop function if exists f14;
drop function if exists f15;
--enable_warnings
create table t1 (i int primary key) engine=innodb;
insert into t1 values (1), (2), (3), (4), (5);
create table t2 (j int primary key) engine=innodb;
insert into t2 values (1), (2), (3), (4), (5);
create table t3 (k int primary key) engine=innodb;
insert into t3 values (1), (2), (3);
create table t4 (l int primary key) engine=innodb;
insert into t4 values (1);
create table t5 (l int primary key) engine=innodb;
insert into t5 values (1);
create view v1 as select i from t1;
create view v2 as select j from t2 where j in (select i from t1);
create procedure p1(k int) insert into t2 values (k);
delimiter |;
create function f1() returns int
begin
declare j int;
select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
return j;
end|
create function f2() returns int
begin
declare k int;
select i from t1 where i = 1 into k;
insert into t2 values (k + 5);
return 0;
end|
create function f3() returns int
begin
return (select i from t1 where i = 3);
end|
create function f4() returns int
begin
if (select i from t1 where i = 3) then
return 1;
else
return 0;
end if;
end|
create function f5() returns int
begin
insert into t2 values ((select i from t1 where i = 1) + 5);
return 0;
end|
create function f6() returns int
begin
declare k int;
select i from v1 where i = 1 into k;
return k;
end|
create function f7() returns int
begin
declare k int;
select j from v2 where j = 1 into k;
return k;
end|
create function f8() returns int
begin
declare k int;
select i from v1 where i = 1 into k;
insert into t2 values (k+5);
return k;
end|
create function f9() returns int
begin
update v2 set j=j+10 where j=1;
return 1;
end|
create function f10() returns int
begin
return f1();
end|
create function f11() returns int
begin
declare k int;
set k= f1();
insert into t2 values (k+5);
return k;
end|
create function f12(p int) returns int
begin
insert into t2 values (p);
return p;
end|
create function f13(p int) returns int
begin
return p;
end|
create procedure p2(inout p int)
begin
select i from t1 where i = 1 into p;
end|
create function f14() returns int
begin
declare k int;
call p2(k);
insert into t2 values (k+5);
return k;
end|
create function f15() returns int
begin
declare k int;
call p2(k);
return k;
end|
create trigger t4_bi before insert on t4 for each row
begin
declare k int;
select i from t1 where i=1 into k;
set new.l= k+1;
end|
create trigger t4_bu before update on t4 for each row
begin
if (select i from t1 where i=1) then
set new.l= 2;
end if;
end|
create trigger t4_bd before delete on t4 for each row
begin
if !(select i from v1 where i=1) then
signal sqlstate '45000';
end if;
end|
create trigger t5_bi before insert on t5 for each row
begin
set new.l= f1()+1;
end|
create trigger t5_bu before update on t5 for each row
begin
declare j int;
call p2(j);
set new.l= j + 1;
end|
delimiter ;|
--echo #
--echo # Set common variables to be used by scripts called below.
--echo #
let $con_aux= con1;
let $table= t1;
--echo #
--echo # 1. Statements that read tables and do not use subqueries.
--echo #
--echo #
--echo # 1.1 Simple SELECT statement.
--echo #
--echo # No locks are necessary as this statement won't be written
--echo # to the binary log and thanks to how MyISAM works SELECT
--echo # will see version of the table prior to concurrent insert.
let $statement= select * from t1;
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 1.2 Multi-UPDATE statement.
--echo #
--echo # Has to take shared locks on rows in the table being read as this
--echo # statement will be written to the binary log and therefore should
--echo # be serialized with concurrent statements.
let $statement= update t2, t1 set j= j - 1 where i = j;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 1.3 Multi-DELETE statement.
--echo #
--echo # The above is true for this statement as well.
let $statement= delete t2 from t1, t2 where i = j;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 1.4 DESCRIBE statement.
--echo #
--echo # This statement does not really read data from the
--echo # target table and thus does not take any lock on it.
--echo # We check this for completeness of coverage.
let $statement= describe t1;
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 1.5 SHOW statements.
--echo #
--echo # The above is true for SHOW statements as well.
let $statement= show create table t1;
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
let $statement= show keys from t1;
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2. Statements which read tables through subqueries.
--echo #
--echo #
--echo # 2.1 CALL with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # A strong lock is not necessary as this statement is not
--echo # written to the binary log as a whole (it is written
--echo # statement-by-statement) and thanks to MVCC we can always get
--echo # versions of rows prior to the update that has locked them.
--echo # But in practice InnoDB does locking reads for all statements
--echo # other than SELECT (unless it is a READ-COMITTED mode or
--echo # innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog is ON).
let $statement= call p1((select i + 5 from t1 where i = 1));
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.2 CREATE TABLE with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Has to take shared locks on rows in the table being read as
--echo # this statement is written to the binary log and therefore
--echo # should be serialized with concurrent statements.
let $statement= create table t0 engine=innodb select * from t1;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
drop table t0;
let $statement= create table t0 engine=innodb select j from t2 where j in (select i from t1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
drop table t0;
--echo #
--echo # 2.3 DELETE with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # The above is true for this statement as well.
let $statement= delete from t2 where j in (select i from t1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.4 MULTI-DELETE with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Same is true for this statement as well.
let $statement= delete t2 from t3, t2 where k = j and j in (select i from t1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.5 DO with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # In theory should not take row locks as it is not logged.
--echo # In practice InnoDB takes shared row locks.
let $statement= do (select i from t1 where i = 1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.6 INSERT with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Has to take shared locks on rows in the table being read as
--echo # this statement is written to the binary log and therefore
--echo # should be serialized with concurrent statements.
let $statement= insert into t2 select i+5 from t1;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= insert into t2 values ((select i+5 from t1 where i = 4));
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.7 LOAD DATA with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # The above is true for this statement as well.
let $statement= load data infile '../../std_data/rpl_loaddata.dat' into table t2 (@a, @b) set j= @b + (select i from t1 where i = 1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.8 REPLACE with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Same is true for this statement as well.
let $statement= replace into t2 select i+5 from t1;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= replace into t2 values ((select i+5 from t1 where i = 4));
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.9 SELECT with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Locks are not necessary as this statement is not written
--echo # to the binary log and thanks to MVCC we can always get
--echo # versions of rows prior to the update that has locked them.
--echo #
--echo # Also serves as a test case for bug #46947 "Embedded SELECT
--echo # without FOR UPDATE is causing a lock".
let $statement= select * from t2 where j in (select i from t1);
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.10 SET with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # In theory should not require locking as it is not written
--echo # to the binary log. In practice InnoDB acquires shared row
--echo # locks.
let $statement= set @a:= (select i from t1 where i = 1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.11 SHOW with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Similarly to the previous case, in theory should not require locking
--echo # as it is not written to the binary log. In practice InnoDB
--echo # acquires shared row locks.
let $statement= show tables from test where Tables_in_test = 't2' and (select i from t1 where i = 1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= show columns from t2 where (select i from t1 where i = 1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.12 UPDATE with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Has to take shared locks on rows in the table being read as
--echo # this statement is written to the binary log and therefore
--echo # should be serialized with concurrent statements.
let $statement= update t2 set j= j-10 where j in (select i from t1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 2.13 MULTI-UPDATE with a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Same is true for this statement as well.
let $statement= update t2, t3 set j= j -10 where j=k and j in (select i from t1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 3. Statements which read tables through a view.
--echo #
--echo #
--echo # 3.1 SELECT statement which uses some table through a view.
--echo #
--echo # Since this statement is not written to the binary log
--echo # and old version of rows are accessible thanks to MVCC,
--echo # no locking is necessary.
let $statement= select * from v1;
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
let $statement= select * from v2;
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
let $statement= select * from t2 where j in (select i from v1);
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
let $statement= select * from t3 where k in (select j from v2);
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 3.2 Statements which modify a table and use views.
--echo #
--echo # Since such statements are going to be written to the binary
--echo # log they need to be serialized against concurrent statements
--echo # and therefore should take shared row locks on data read.
let $statement= update t2 set j= j-10 where j in (select i from v1);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= update t3 set k= k-10 where k in (select j from v2);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= update t2, v1 set j= j-10 where j = i;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= update v2 set j= j-10 where j = 3;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4. Statements which read tables through stored functions.
--echo #
--echo #
--echo # 4.1 SELECT/SET with a stored function which does not
--echo # modify data and uses SELECT in its turn.
--echo #
--echo # In theory there is no need to take row locks on the table
--echo # being selected from in SF as the call to such function
--echo # won't get into the binary log. In practice, however, we
--echo # discover that fact too late in the process to be able to
--echo # affect the decision what locks should be taken.
--echo # Hence, strong locks are taken in this case.
let $statement= select f1();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= set @a:= f1();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.2 INSERT (or other statement which modifies data) with
--echo # a stored function which does not modify data and uses
--echo # SELECT.
--echo #
--echo # Since such statement is written to the binary log it should
--echo # be serialized with concurrent statements affecting the data
--echo # it uses. Therefore it should take row locks on the data
--echo # it reads.
let $statement= insert into t2 values (f1() + 5);
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.3 SELECT/SET with a stored function which
--echo # reads and modifies data.
--echo #
--echo # Since a call to such function is written to the binary log,
--echo # it should be serialized with concurrent statements affecting
--echo # the data it uses. Hence, row locks on the data read
--echo # should be taken.
let $statement= select f2();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= set @a:= f2();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.4. SELECT/SET with a stored function which does not
--echo # modify data and reads a table through subselect
--echo # in a control construct.
--echo #
--echo # Again, in theory a call to this function won't get to the
--echo # binary log and thus no locking is needed. But in practice
--echo # we don't detect this fact early enough (get_lock_type_for_table())
--echo # to avoid taking row locks.
let $statement= select f3();
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= set @a:= f3();
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= select f4();
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= set @a:= f4();
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.5. INSERT (or other statement which modifies data) with
--echo # a stored function which does not modify data and reads
--echo # the table through a subselect in one of its control
--echo # constructs.
--echo #
--echo # Since such statement is written to the binary log it should
--echo # be serialized with concurrent statements affecting data it
--echo # uses. Therefore it should take row locks on the data
--echo # it reads.
let $statement= insert into t2 values (f3() + 5);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= insert into t2 values (f4() + 6);
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.6 SELECT/SET which uses a stored function with
--echo # DML which reads a table via a subquery.
--echo #
--echo # Since call to such function is written to the binary log
--echo # it should be serialized with concurrent statements.
--echo # Hence reads should take row locks.
let $statement= select f5();
let $wait_statement= insert into t2 values ((select i from t1 where i = 1) + 5);
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= set @a:= f5();
let $wait_statement= insert into t2 values ((select i from t1 where i = 1) + 5);
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.7 SELECT/SET which uses a stored function which
--echo # doesn't modify data and reads tables through
--echo # a view.
--echo #
--echo # Once again, in theory, calls to such functions won't
--echo # get into the binary log and thus don't need row
--echo # locks. But in practice this fact is discovered
--echo # too late to have any effect.
let $statement= select f6();
let $wait_statement= select i from v1 where i = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= set @a:= f6();
let $wait_statement= select i from v1 where i = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= select f7();
let $wait_statement= select j from v2 where j = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= set @a:= f7();
let $wait_statement= select j from v2 where j = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.8 INSERT which uses stored function which
--echo # doesn't modify data and reads a table
--echo # through a view.
--echo #
--echo # Since such statement is written to the binary log and
--echo # should be serialized with concurrent statements affecting
--echo # the data it uses. Therefore it should take row locks on
--echo # the rows it reads.
let $statement= insert into t3 values (f6() + 5);
let $wait_statement= select i from v1 where i = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= insert into t3 values (f7() + 5);
let $wait_statement= select j from v2 where j = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.9 SELECT which uses a stored function which
--echo # modifies data and reads tables through a view.
--echo #
--echo # Since a call to such function is written to the binary log
--echo # it should be serialized with concurrent statements.
--echo # Hence, reads should take row locks.
let $statement= select f8();
let $wait_statement= select i from v1 where i = 1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
let $statement= select f9();
let $wait_statement= update v2 set j=j+10 where j=1;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.10 SELECT which uses stored function which doesn't modify
--echo # data and reads a table indirectly, by calling another
--echo # function.
--echo #
--echo # In theory, calls to such functions won't get into the binary
--echo # log and thus don't need to acquire row locks. But in practice
--echo # this fact is discovered too late to have any effect.
let $statement= select f10();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.11 INSERT which uses a stored function which doesn't modify
--echo # data and reads a table indirectly, by calling another
--echo # function.
--echo #
--echo # Since such statement is written to the binary log, it should
--echo # be serialized with concurrent statements affecting the data it
--echo # uses. Therefore it should take row locks on data it reads.
let $statement= insert into t2 values (f10() + 5);
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.12 SELECT which uses a stored function which modifies
--echo # data and reads a table indirectly, by calling another
--echo # function.
--echo #
--echo # Since a call to such function is written to the binary log
--echo # it should be serialized from concurrent statements.
--echo # Hence, reads should take row locks.
let $statement= select f11();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.13 SELECT that reads a table through a subquery passed
--echo # as a parameter to a stored function which modifies
--echo # data.
--echo #
--echo # Even though a call to this function is written to the
--echo # binary log, values of its parameters are written as literals.
--echo # So there is no need to acquire row locks on rows used in
--echo # the subquery.
let $statement= select f12((select i+10 from t1 where i=1));
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 4.14 INSERT that reads a table via a subquery passed
--echo # as a parameter to a stored function which doesn't
--echo # modify data.
--echo #
--echo # Since this statement is written to the binary log it should
--echo # be serialized with concurrent statements affecting the data it
--echo # uses. Therefore it should take row locks on the data it reads.
let $statement= insert into t2 values (f13((select i+10 from t1 where i=1)));
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 5. Statements that read tables through stored procedures.
--echo #
--echo #
--echo # 5.1 CALL statement which reads a table via SELECT.
--echo #
--echo # Since neither this statement nor its components are
--echo # written to the binary log, there is no need to take
--echo # row locks on the data it reads.
let $statement= call p2(@a);
--source include/check_no_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 5.2 Function that modifes data and uses CALL,
--echo # which reads a table through SELECT.
--echo #
--echo # Since a call to such function is written to the binary
--echo # log, it should be serialized with concurrent statements.
--echo # Hence, in this case reads should take row locks on data.
let $statement= select f14();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into p;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 5.3 SELECT that calls a function that doesn't modify data and
--echo # uses a CALL statement that reads a table via SELECT.
--echo #
--echo # In theory, calls to such functions won't get into the binary
--echo # log and thus don't need to acquire row locks. But in practice
--echo # this fact is discovered too late to have any effect.
let $statement= select f15();
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into p;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 5.4 INSERT which calls function which doesn't modify data and
--echo # uses CALL statement which reads table through SELECT.
--echo #
--echo # Since such statement is written to the binary log it should
--echo # be serialized with concurrent statements affecting data it
--echo # uses. Therefore it should take row locks on data it reads.
let $statement= insert into t2 values (f15()+5);
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into p;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 6. Statements that use triggers.
--echo #
--echo #
--echo # 6.1 Statement invoking a trigger that reads table via SELECT.
--echo #
--echo # Since this statement is written to the binary log it should
--echo # be serialized with concurrent statements affecting the data
--echo # it uses. Therefore, it should take row locks on the data
--echo # it reads.
let $statement= insert into t4 values (2);
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i=1 into k;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 6.2 Statement invoking a trigger that reads table through
--echo # a subquery in a control construct.
--echo #
--echo # The above is true for this statement as well.
let $statement= update t4 set l= 2 where l = 1;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 6.3 Statement invoking a trigger that reads a table through
--echo # a view.
--echo #
--echo # And for this statement.
let $statement= delete from t4 where l = 1;
let $wait_statement= $statement;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 6.4 Statement invoking a trigger that reads a table through
--echo # a stored function.
--echo #
--echo # And for this statement.
let $statement= insert into t5 values (2);
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into j;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo #
--echo # 6.5 Statement invoking a trigger that reads a table through
--echo # stored procedure.
--echo #
--echo # And for this statement.
let $statement= update t5 set l= 2 where l = 1;
let $wait_statement= select i from t1 where i = 1 into p;
--source include/check_shared_row_lock.inc
--echo # Clean-up.
drop function f1;
drop function f2;
drop function f3;
drop function f4;
drop function f5;
drop function f6;
drop function f7;
drop function f8;
drop function f9;
drop function f10;
drop function f11;
drop function f12;
drop function f13;
drop function f14;
drop function f15;
drop view v1, v2;
drop procedure p1;
drop procedure p2;
drop table t1, t2, t3, t4, t5;
disconnect con1;
--echo #
--echo # Test for bug#51263 "Deadlock between transactional SELECT
--echo # and ALTER TABLE ... REBUILD PARTITION".
--echo #
connect (con1,localhost,root,,test,,);
connection default;
--disable_warnings
drop table if exists t1, t2;
--enable_warnings
create table t1 (i int auto_increment not null primary key) engine=innodb;
create table t2 (i int) engine=innodb;
insert into t1 values (1), (2), (3), (4), (5);
begin;
--echo # Acquire SR metadata lock on t1 and LOCK_S row-locks on its rows.
insert into t2 select count(*) from t1;
--echo # Switching to connection 'con1'.
connection con1;
--echo # Sending:
--send alter table t1 add column j int
--echo # Switching to connection 'default'.
connection default;
--echo # Wait until ALTER is blocked because it tries to upgrade SNW
--echo # metadata lock to X lock.
--echo # It should not be blocked during copying data to new version of
--echo # table as it acquires LOCK_S locks on rows of old version, which
--echo # are compatible with locks acquired by connection 'con1'.
let $wait_condition=
select count(*) = 1 from information_schema.processlist where state =
"Waiting for table" and info = "alter table t1 add column j int";
--source include/wait_condition.inc
--echo # The below statement will deadlock because it will try to acquire
--echo # SW lock on t1, which will conflict with ALTER's SNW lock. And
--echo # ALTER will be waiting for this connection to release its SR lock.
--echo # This deadlock should be detected by an MDL subsystem and this
--echo # statement should be aborted with an appropriate error.
--error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
insert into t1 values (6);
--echo # Unblock ALTER TABLE.
commit;
--echo # Switching to connection 'con1'.
connection con1;
--echo # Reaping ALTER TABLE.
--reap
--echo # Switching to connection 'default'.
connection default;
--echo #
--echo # Now test for scenario in which bug was reported originally.
--echo #
drop tables t1, t2;
create table t1 (i int auto_increment not null primary key) engine=innodb
partition by hash (i) partitions 4;
create table t2 (i int) engine=innodb;
insert into t1 values (1), (2), (3), (4), (5);
begin;
--echo # Acquire SR metadata lock on t1.
select * from t1;
--echo # Switching to connection 'con1'.
connection con1;
--echo # Sending:
--send alter table t1 rebuild partition p0
--echo # Switching to connection 'default'.
connection default;
--echo # Wait until ALTER is blocked because of active SR lock.
let $wait_condition=
select count(*) = 1 from information_schema.processlist
where state = "Waiting for table" and info = "alter table t1 rebuild partition p0";
--source include/wait_condition.inc
--echo # The below statement should succeed as transaction
--echo # has SR metadata lock on t1 and only going to read
--echo # rows from it.
insert into t2 select count(*) from t1;
--echo # Unblock ALTER TABLE.
commit;
--echo # Switching to connection 'con1'.
connection con1;
--echo # Reaping ALTER TABLE.
--reap
--echo # Switching to connection 'default'.
connection default;
disconnect con1;
--echo # Clean-up.
drop tables t1, t2;
# Check that all connections opened by test cases in this file are really
# gone so execution of other tests won't be affected by their presence.
--source include/wait_until_count_sessions.inc
View Git Blame Copy Permalink