1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-29 00:08:14 +03:00
Files
mariadb/mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole_basic.test
Sujatha b347396181 MDEV-11094: Blackhole table updates on slave fail when row annotation is enabled
Problem:
=======
rpl_blackhole.test fails when executed with following options
mysqld=--binlog_annotate_row_events=1, mysqld=--replicate_annotate_row_events=1

Test output:
------------
worker[1] Using MTR_BUILD_THREAD 300, with reserved ports 16000..16019
rpl.rpl_blackhole_bug 'mix'              [ pass ]    791
rpl.rpl_blackhole_bug 'row'              [ fail ]
Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table
Last_Errno	1032
Last_Error	Could not execute Update_rows_v1 event on table test.t1; Can't find
record in 't1', Error_code: 1032; handler error HA_ERR_END_OF_FILE; the event's
master log master-bin.000001, end_log_pos 1510

Analysis:
=========
Enabling "replicate_annotate_row_events" on slave, Tells the slave to write
annotate rows events received from the master to its own binary log. The
received annotate events are applied after the Gtid event as shown below.
thd->query() will be set to the actual query received from the master, through
annotate event. Annotate_rows event should not be deleted after the event is
applied as the thd->query will be used to generate new Annotate_rows event
during applying the subsequent Rows events. After the last Rows event has been
applied, the saved Annotate_rows event (if any) will be deleted.

In balckhole engine all the DML operations are noops as they donot store any
data. They simply return success without doing any operation. But the existing
strictly expects thd->query() to be 'NULL' to identify that row based
replication is in use. This assumption will fail when row annotations are
enabled as the query is not 'NULL'. Hence various row based operations like
'update', 'delete', 'index lookup' will fail when row annotations are enabled.

Fix:
===
Extend the row based replication check to include row annotations as well.
i.e Either the thd->query() is NULL or thd->query() points to query and row
annotations are in use.
2019-05-29 15:18:52 +05:30

98 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext

# PURPOSE. Test that blackhole works with replication in all three
# modes: STATEMENT, MIXED, and ROW.
#
# METHOD. We start by creating a table on the master and then change
# the engine to use blackhole on the slave.
#
# After insert/update/delete of one or more rows, the test the
# proceeds to check that replication is running after replicating an
# change, that the blackhole engine does not contain anything (which
# is just a check that the correct engine is used), and that something
# is written to the binary log.
#
# Whe check INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statement for tables with no
# key (forcing a range search on the slave), primary keys (using a
# primary key lookup), and index/key with multiple matches (forcing an
# index search).
# We start with no primary key
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT, b INT, c INT);
CREATE TABLE t2 (a INT, b INT, c INT);
sync_slave_with_master;
ALTER TABLE t1 ENGINE=BLACKHOLE;
connection master;
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1,9,1), (2,9,2), (3,9,3), (4,9,4);
sync_slave_with_master;
# Test insert, no primary key
let $statement = INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,1,1),(2,1,2),(3,1,3),(4,1,4);
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
# Test update, no primary key
let $statement = UPDATE t1 SET c = 2*c WHERE a % 2 = 0 AND b = 1;
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
# Test delete, no primary key
let $statement = DELETE FROM t1 WHERE a % 2 = 0 AND b = 1;
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
# Test INSERT-SELECT into Blackhole, no primary key
let $statement = INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t2;
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
#
# The MASTER has MyISAM as the engine for both tables. The SLAVE has Blackhole
# on t1 (transactional engine) and MyISAM on t2 (non-transactional engine).
#
# In MIXED mode, the command "INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM t1" is logged as
# statement on the master. On the slave, it is tagged as unsafe because the
# statement mixes both transactional and non-transactional engines and as such
# its changes are logged as rows. However, due to the nature of the blackhole
# engine, no rows are returned and thus any chain replication would make the
# next master on the chain diverge.
#
# Fo this reason, we have disabled the statement.
#
# Test INSERT-SELECT from Blackhole, no primary key
# let $statement = INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM t1;
# source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
#
connection master;
ALTER TABLE t1 ADD PRIMARY KEY pk_t1 (a,b);
sync_slave_with_master;
# Test insert, primary key
let $statement = INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,2,1),(2,2,2),(3,2,3),(4,2,4);
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
# Test update, primary key
let $statement = UPDATE t1 SET c = 2*c WHERE a % 2 = 0 AND b = 2;
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
# Test delete, primary key
let $statement = DELETE FROM t1 WHERE a % 2 = 0 AND b = 2;
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
connection master;
ALTER TABLE t1 DROP PRIMARY KEY, ADD KEY key_t1 (a);
sync_slave_with_master;
# Test insert, key
let $statement = INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,3,1),(2,3,2),(3,3,3),(4,3,4);
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
# Test update, key
let $statement = UPDATE t1 SET c = 2*c WHERE a % 2 = 0 AND b = 3;
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
# Test delete, key
let $statement = DELETE FROM t1 WHERE a % 2 = 0 AND b = 3;
source extra/rpl_tests/rpl_blackhole.test;
connection master;
DROP TABLE t1,t2;
sync_slave_with_master;