- Handle stored function conditions correctly, with the same logic as with UDFs.
- When running queries on Spider SE, by default, we do not push down WHERE conditions containing usage of UDFs/stored functions to remote data nodes, unless the user demands (by setting spider_use_pushdown_udf).
- Disable direct update/delete when a udf condition is skipped.
The columns that are part of DEFAULT expression were not read-marked
in statements like UPDATE...SET b=DEFAULT.
The problem is `F(DEFAULT)` expression depends of the left-hand side of an
assignment. However, setup_fields accepts only right-hand side value.
Neither Item::fix_fields does.
Suchwise, b=DEFAULT(b) works fine, because Item_default_field has
information on what field it is default of:
if (thd->mark_used_columns != MARK_COLUMNS_NONE)
def_field->default_value->expr->update_used_tables();
in Item_default_value::fix_fields().
It is not reasonable to pass a left-hand side to Item:fix_fields, because
the case is rare, so the rewrite
b= F(DEFAULT) -> b= F(DEFAULT(b))
is made instead.
Both UPDATE and multi-UPDATE are affected, however any form of INSERT
is not: it marks all the fields in DEFAULT expressions for read in
TABLE::mark_default_fields_for_write().
Reformulate mark_columns_used_by_index* function family in a more laconic
way:
mark_columns_used_by_index -> mark_index_columns
mark_columns_used_by_index_for_read_no_reset -> mark_index_columns_for_read
mark_columns_used_by_index_no_reset -> mark_index_columns_no_reset
static mark_index_columns -> do_mark_index_columns
Both EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN EXTENDED statements produce different results set
in case it is run in normal way and in PS mode for the statements
UPDATE/DELETE with subquery.
The use case below reproduces the issue:
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT KEY) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,128 sec)
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t2 (c2 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,023 sec)
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t3 (c3 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,021 sec)
MariaDB [test]> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
-> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
-> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
-> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | t3 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 100.00 | |
| 2 | SUBQUERY | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,002 sec)
MariaDB [test]> PREPARE stmt FROM
-> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
-> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
-> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
-> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,000 sec)
Statement prepared
MariaDB [test]> EXECUTE stmt;
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | Extra |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| 1 | PRIMARY | t3 | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 100.00 | |
| 2 | SUBQUERY | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | no matching row in const table |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,000 sec)
The reason by that different result sets are produced is that on execution
of the statement 'EXECUTE stmt' the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE not set
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for instances of SELECT_LEX that
correspond to subqueries used in the UPDTAE/DELETE statements.
Initially, these flags were set on parsing the statement
PREPARE stmt FROM "EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET ..."
but latter they were reset before starting real execution of
the parsed query during handling the statement 'EXECUTE stmt';
So, to fix the issue the functions mysql_update()/mysql_delete()
have been modified to set the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE forcibly
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for the primary SELECT_LEX
of the UPDATE/DELETE statement.
This commits replaces the call of the function setup_tables() with
a call of the function setup_tables_and_check_access() in the method
Multiupdate_prelocking_strategy::handle_end().
There is no known bug that would require this change. However the change
aligns this piece of code with the code existed before the patch for
MDEV-24823.
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
If a multi-update query was killed because of timeout or a kill statement,
there was a chance the query returned the error "An error occurred in
multi-table update" instead of the right error, like
"Query execution was interrupted".
Cause: no table->update_handler cloned at the moment of
vers_insert_history_row(). update_handler is needed because there
can't be several inited indexes at once in the same handler. First
index is inited by QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::reset(). Then when history row
is inserted check_duplicate_long_entry_key() is done and it requires
another index.
through 2nd execution of SP
This bug caused a server crash on the second call of any stored procedure
that contained an UPDATE statement over a multi-table view reporting an
error message at the prepare stage.
On the first call of the stored procedure after reporting an error at
the preparation stage of the UPDATE statement finished without calling
the function SELECT_LEX::save_prep_leaf_tables() for the SELECT used as
the definition of the view. This left the SELECT_LEX structure used by
the UPDATE statement in an inconsistent state for second call of the stored
procedure.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
Add history row outside of compare_record() check. For TRX_ID
versioning we have to fail can_compare_record to force InnoDB update
which adds history row; and there in ha_innobase::update_row() is
additional "row changed" check where we force history row anyway.
in queries like
create view v1 as select 2 like 1 escape (3 in (select 0 union select 1));
select 2 union select * from v1;
Item_func_like::escape was left uninitialized, because
Item_in_optimizer is const_during_execution()
but not actually const_item() during execution.
It's not, because const subquery evaluation was disabled for derived.
Practically it only needs to be disabled for multi-update
that runs fix_fields() before all tables are locked.
For debug build of MariaDB server running of the following test case
will hit the assert `thd->lex->sql_command == SQLCOM_UPDATE' in the function
check_fields() on attempt to execute the UPDATE statement.
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT);
UPDATE t1 FOR PORTION OF APPTIME FROM (SELECT 1 FROM t1) TO 2 SET a = 1;
Stack trace to the fired assert statement
DBUG_ASSERT(thd->lex->sql_command == SQLCOM_UPDATE)
listed below:
mysql_execute_command() ->
mysql_multi_update_prepare() -->
Multiupdate_prelocking_strategy::handle_end() -->
check_fiels()
It's worth to note that this stack trace looks like a multi update
statement is being executed. The fired assert is checked inside the
function check_fields() in case table->has_period() returns the value
true that in turns happens when temporal period specified in the UPDATE
statement. Condition specified in the DEBUG_ASSERT statement returns
the false value since the data member thd->lex->sql_command have the
value SQLCOM_UPDATE_MULTI. So, the main question is why a program control
flow go to the path prescribed for handling MULTI update statement
despite of the fact that the ordinary UPDATE statement being executed.
The answer is a way that SQL grammar rules written.
When the statement
UPDATE t1 FOR PORTION OF APPTIME FROM (SELECT 1 FROM t1) TO 2 SET a = 1;
being parsed an action for the rule 'table_primary_ident' (part of this action
is listed below to simplify description) is invoked to handle the table
name 't1' specified in the clause 'SELECT 1 FROM t1'.
table_primary_ident:
table_ident opt_use_partition opt_for_system_time_clause
opt_table_alias_clause opt_key_definition
{
SELECT_LEX *sel= Select;
sel->table_join_options= 0;
if (!($$= Select->add_table_to_list(thd, $1, $4,
This action calls the method st_select_lex::add_table_to_list()
to add the table name 't1' to the list of tables being used by the statement.
Later, an action for the following grammar rule
update_table_list:
table_ident opt_use_partition for_portion_of_time_clause
opt_table_alias_clause opt_key_definition
{
SELECT_LEX *sel= Select;
sel->table_join_options= 0;
if (!($$= Select->add_table_to_list(thd, $1, $4,
is invoked to handle the clause 't1 FOR PORTION OF APPTIME FROM ... TO 2'.
This action also calls the method st_select_lex::add_table_to_list()
to add the table name 't1' to the list of tables being used by the statement.
In result the table name 't1' contained twice in this list.
Presence of duplicate names for the table 't1' in a list of table used by
a statement leads to the fact that the function unique_table() called
from the function mysql_update() returns the value true that forces
implementation of the function mysql_update() to return the value 2 as
a signal to fall through the case boundary of the switch statement placed
in the function mysql_execute_statement() and start handling of the case
for sql_command SQLCOM_UPDATE_MULTI. The compound statement block for the
case SQLCOM_UPDATE_MULTI invokes the function mysql_multi_update_prepare()
that executes the statement
set thd->lex->sql_command= SQLCOM_UPDATE_MULTI;
and after that calls the method
Multiupdate_prelocking_strategy::handle_end(). Finally, this method
invokes the check_field() function and assert is fired.
The above analysis shows that update for a table that simultaneously specified
both as a destination table of UPDATE statement and as a table taking part in
subquery is actually treated by MariaDB server as multi-update statement.
Taking into account that multi-update statement for temporal period
table is not supported yet by MariaDB, correct way to fix the bug is to return
the error ER_NOT_SUPPORTED_YET for this case.
is_bulk_op())' fails on UPDATE on a partitioned table with subquery
(MySQL:71630)
Analysis and fix: Error is not checked. So correct error state is not returned.
Fix: Check for error and return the error state.
In main.index_merge_myisam we remove the test that was added in
commit a2d24def8c because
it duplicates the test case that was added in
commit 5af12e4635.
Turn read cache off for periodic update.
Like 498a96a4 says:
Aria with row_format=fixed uses IO_CACHE of type READ_CACHE for
sequential read in update loop. When history row is inserted inside
this loop the cache misses it and fails with error.
This applicable to any additional row inserts on UPDATE. In this case
it was initiated by UPDATE FOR PORTION.
Related to MDEV-20441.
Cause
Join tmp table inserts null row because of OUTER JOIN, that's
expected. Since `multi_update::prepare2()` converted
`Item_temptable_rowid` into `Item_field` (28dbdf3)
`multi_update::send_data()` accesses join tmp record directly and
treats it as a normal row ignoring null status of ref field. NULL ref
field is then treated as normal in `multi_update::do_updates()` which
tries to position updated table by reference 0.
Note that reference 0 may be valid reference and the first row of
table can be wrongly updated (see multi_update.test).
Fix
Do not add row into multi-update tmp table in case of null ref
field. Join tmp table does not have null_row status at this time (as
well as `STATUS_NULL_ROW`) and cannot be skipped by these properties
(see first comment in multi_update::send_data()). But it has all null
fields (including the ref field).
Wrong assertion condition. SYSTEM_TIME_ALL indicates that
vers_setup_conds() is done. In case FOR SYSTEM_TIME ALL is specified
in command the assertion passes but not checks anything.
Turn read cache off for update and multi-update for versioned
table. no_cache is reinited on each TABLE open because it is
applicable for specific algorithms.
As a side fix vers_insert_history_row() honors vers_write setting.
Aria with row_format=fixed uses IO_CACHE of type READ_CACHE for
sequential read in update loop. When history row is inserted inside
this loop the cache misses it and fails with error.
TODO:
Currently maria_extra() does not support SEQ_READ_APPEND. Probably it
might be possible to use this type of cache.
