This makes the keys smaller (no row pointer) and gives us proper errors if we
use the table wrongly.
sql/sql_select.cc:
Use NO_RECORD for tables that doesn't need row data.
storage/maria/Makefile.am:
Added ma_norec.c
storage/maria/ma_check.c:
Added support for NO_RECORD record format (don't store any row data)
storage/maria/ma_norec.c:
Added support for NO_RECORD record format
storage/maria/ma_open.c:
Added support for NO_RECORD record format
storage/maria/ma_search.c:
Added support for 0 size row pointers (used with NO_RECORD)
storage/maria/ma_test1.c:
Added testing of NO_RECORD record format.
storage/maria/maria_chk.c:
Added support for NO_RECORD
storage/maria/maria_def.h:
Added support for NO_RECORD
storage/maria/unittest/ma_test_all-t:
Added testing of NO_RECORD record format
temptables, not "uniques", that are hash-based keys.
sql/sql_expression_cache.cc:
Don't set uniques (we don't want or need an unique
constraint on this table)
Made sure that the optimal fields are used by TABLE_REF objects
when building index access keys to joined tables.
Fixed a bug in the template function that sorts the elements of
a list using the bubble sort algorithm. The bug caused poor
performance of the function. Also added an optimization that
skips comparison with the most heavy elements that has been
already properly placed in the list.
Made the comparison of the fields belonging to the same Item_equal
more granular: fields belonging to the same table are also ordered
according to some rules.
An assertion failure was triggered for a 6-way join query that used two
join buffers.
The failure happened because every call of JOIN_CACHE::join_matching_records
saved and restored status of all tables that were accessed before the table
join_tab. It must do it only for those of them that follow the last table
using a join buffer.
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:15:25 -0000
3272 Roy Lyseng 2010-11-01
Bug#52068: Optimizer generates invalid semijoin materialization plan
When MaterializeScan semijoin strategy was used and there were one
or more outer dependent tables before the semijoin tables, the scan
over the materialized table was not properly reset for each row of
the prefix outer tables.
Example: suppose we have a join order:
ot1 SJ-Mat-Scan(it2 it3) ot4
Notice that this is called a MaterializeScan, even though there is an
outer table ahead of the materialized tables. Usually a MaterializeScan
has the outer tables after the materialized table, but this is
a special (but legal) case with outer dependent tables both before and
after the materialized table.
For each qualifying row from ot1, a new scan over the materialized
table must be set up. The code failed to do that, so all scans after
the first one returned zero rows from the materialized table.
One of the hash functions employed by the BNLH join algorithm
calculates the the value of hash index for key value utilizing
every byte of the key buffer. To make this calculation valid
one has to ensure that for any key value unused bytes of the
buffer are filled with with a certain filler. We choose 0 as
a filler for these bytes.
Added an optional boolean parameter with_zerofill to the function
key_copy. If the value of the parameter is TRUE all unused bytes
of the key buffer is filled with 0.
In some cases the function make_cond_for_index() was mistaken
when detecting index only pushdown conditions for a table:
a pushdown condition that was not index only could be marked
as such.
It happened because the procedure erroneously used the markers
for index only conditions that remained from the calls of
this function that extracted the index conditions for other
tables.
Fixed by erasing index only markers as soon as they are need
anymore.
Switch from "Disable identical key handling optimization when
IndexConditionPushdown is used" approach
To
an approach where we save/restore index tuple and so can use index condition pushdown.
Analysis:
The assert failed because st_select_lex::print() was called for subqueries
as follows:
Item_subselect::print() ->
subselect_single_select_engine::print() -> st_select_lex::print()
It was Item_subselect::fix_fields() that set the thd by calling set_thd(),
so when this print() was called before fix_fields(), subselect_engine::thd
was NULL.
Solution:
The patch makes all constructors of all subselect_engine classes to take
a THD parameter. The default subselect_single_select_engine engine is created
early during parse time, in the Item_subselect::init call, so we pass the
correct THD object already at this point.
- This allows us to detect missing my_afree() calls and also find overruns (when running with valgrind) to alloca() areas.
- Added missing my_afree() calls
- Fixed wrong call to my_afree()
include/my_sys.h:
When compiling with valgrind, change my_alloca() to use my_malloc()
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_bug57255.test:
Speed up taste case (patch from Stewart Smith)
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/t/innodb_bug57255.test:
Speed up taste case (patch from Stewart Smith)
sql/ha_partition.cc:
Removed casts from my_afree()
sql/opt_range.cc:
Add missing my_afree() calls.
storage/maria/ma_rt_split.c:
Fixed wrong parameter to my_afree()
