1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-07-27 18:02:13 +03:00
Commit Graph

7817 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
54b2e1c1be MDEV-16697: Fix difference between 32bit/windows and 64bit systems in allowed select nest level 2018-11-07 09:43:12 +01:00
074c684099 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2018-11-06 16:24:16 +02:00
df563e0c03 Merge 10.2 into 10.3
main.derived_cond_pushdown: Move all 10.3 tests to the end,
trim trailing white space, and add an "End of 10.3 tests" marker.
Add --sorted_result to tests where the ordering is not deterministic.

main.win_percentile: Add --sorted_result to tests where the
ordering is no longer deterministic.
2018-11-06 09:40:39 +02:00
e058a251c1 MDEV-17518: Range optimization doesn't use ON expressions from nested outer joins
Part#2: take into account that join nest that we are marking as constant
might already have constant tables in it. Don't count these tables twice.
2018-11-05 21:10:15 +03:00
14b62b1578 MDEV-17518: Range optimization doesn't use ON expressions from nested outer joins
Continuation of the fix: Make condition selectivity estimate use the
right estimate, too.
2018-11-05 21:10:15 +03:00
3b6d903852 MDEV-17493: Partition pruning doesn't work for nested outer joins
Reuse the fix for MDEV-17518 here, too.
2018-11-05 21:10:15 +03:00
03680a9b4f MDEV-17518: Range optimization doesn't use ON expressions from nested outer joins 2018-11-05 21:10:15 +03:00
1c6b982e02 MDEV-12779 Oracle/DB2 Compatibility Implicit Ordering for ROW_NUMBER OVER
Users expect window functions to produce a certain ordering of rows in
the final result set. Although the standard does not require this, we
already have the filesort result done for when we computed the window
function. If there is no ORDER BY attached to the query, just keep it
till the SELECT is completely evaluated and use that to print the
result.

Update test cases as many did not take care to guarantee a stable
result.
2018-11-01 21:15:55 +02:00
76318d55aa MDEV-17525: Window functions not working in ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode
The ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode states that for SELECT ... GROUP BY queries,
disallow SELECTing columns which are not referred to in the GROUP BY clause,
unless they are passed to an aggregate function like COUNT() or MAX().
This holds only for the GROUP BY clause of the query.
The code also checks this for the partition clause of the window function which is
incorrect.
2018-10-26 06:51:40 +02:00
9b14e37717 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2018-10-18 12:22:48 +03:00
f454189c60 Merge 10.2 into 10.3 2018-10-17 19:37:05 +03:00
af6077b535 MDEV-16990:server crashes in base_list_iterator::next
When we have a query which has implicit_grouping then we are sure that we would end up with only one
row so there is no point to do DISTINCT computation
2018-10-14 10:44:00 -07:00
2a955c7a83 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2018-10-10 10:36:51 +03:00
e2535dcc04 MDEV-17382 Hash join algorithm should not be used to join materialized
derived table / view by equality

Now rows of a materialized derived table are always put into a
temporary table before join operation. If BNLH is used to join this
table with the result of a partial join then both operands of the
join are actually put into main memory. In most cases this is not
efficient.
We could avoid this by sending the rows of the derived table directly
to the join operation. However this kind of data flow is not supported
yet.
Fixed by not allowing usage of hash join algorithm to join a materialized
derived table if it's joined by an equality predicate of the form
f=e where f is a field of the derived table.

Change for the test case in 10.3: splitting must be turned off to preserve
the explain.
2018-10-08 06:19:27 -07:00
1ebe841fb8 MDEV-17382 Hash join algorithm should not be used to join materialized
derived table / view by equality

Now rows of a materialized derived table are always put into a
temporary table before join operation. If BNLH is used to join this
table with the result of a partial join then both operands of the
join are actually put into main memory. In most cases this is not
efficient.
We could avoid this by sending the rows of the derived table directly
to the join operation. However this kind of data flow is not supported
yet.
Fixed by not allowing usage of hash join algorithm to join a materialized
derived table if it's joined by an equality predicate of the form
f=e where f is a field of the derived table.
2018-10-08 00:31:37 -07:00
1eca49577e MDEV-17382 Hash join algorithm should not be used to join materialized
derived table / view by equality

Now rows of a materialized derived table are always put into a
temporary table before join operation. If BNLH is used to join this
table with the result of a partial join then both operands of the
join are actually put into main memory. In most cases this is not
efficient.
We could avoid this by sending the rows of the derived table directly
to the join operation. However this kind of data flow is not supported
yet.
Fixed by not allowing usage of hash join algorithm to join a materialized
derived table if it's joined by an equality predicate of the form
f=e where f is a field of the derived table.
2018-10-07 14:42:22 -07:00
bd21904357 MDEV-17382 Hash join algorithm should not be used to join materialized
derived table / view by equality

Now rows of a materialized derived table are always put into a
temporary table before join operation. If BNLH is used to join this
table with the result of a partial join then both operands of the
join are actually put into main memory. In most cases this is not
efficient.
We could avoid this by sending the rows of the derived table directly
to the join operation. However this kind of data flow is not supported
yet.
Fixed by not allowing usage of hash join algorithm to join a materialized
derived table if it's joined by an equality predicate of the form
f=e where f is a field of the derived table.
2018-10-07 13:12:27 -07:00
0b7339eb45 MDEV-17382 Hash join algorithm should not be used to join materialized
derived table / view by equality

Now rows of a materialized derived table are always put into a
temporary table before join operation. If BNLH is used to join this
table with the result of a partial join then both operands of the
join are actually put into main memory. In most cases this is not
efficient.
We could avoid this by sending the rows of the derived table directly
to the join operation. However this kind of data flow is not supported
yet.
Fixed by not allowing usage of hash join algorithm to join a materialized
derived table if it's joined by an equality predicate of the form
f=e where f is a field of the derived table.
2018-10-07 10:19:19 -07:00
444c380ceb Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2018-10-05 08:09:49 +03:00
8d5a11122c MDEV-16188: Use in-memory PK filters built from range index scans
First phase: make optimizer choose to use filter and show it in EXPLAIN.
2018-09-28 23:50:22 +03:00
57e0da50bb Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2018-09-28 16:37:06 +02:00
5ae8fce50b Merge branch '10.1' into 10.2 2018-09-24 11:46:08 +02:00
4a246fecbd Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2018-09-19 08:21:03 +03:00
c5a9a63293 MDEV-16917 Index affects query results
The optimizer erroneously allowed to use join cache when joining a
splittable materialized table together with splitting optimization.
As a consequence in some rare cases the server returned wrong result
sets for queries with materialized derived.

This patch allows to use either join cache without usage of splitting
technique for materialization of a splittable derived table or splitting
without usage of join cache when joining such table. The costs the these
alternatives are compared and the best variant is chosen.
2018-09-15 14:28:33 -07:00
28f08d3753 Merge branch '10.1' into 10.2 2018-09-14 08:47:22 +02:00
e63b84b916 MDEV-17155: Incorrect ORDER BY optimization: full index scan is used instead of range
The bug was this scenario:
1. Join optimizer picks a range plan on index IDX1
   (This index doesn't match the ORDER BY clause, so sorting will be needed)
2. Index Condition Pushdown pushes a part of WHERE down. The pushed
   condition is removed from SQL_SELECT::cond
3. test_if_skip_sort_order() figures that it's better to use IDX2
   (as it will match ORDER BY ... LIMIT and so will execute faster)

3.1 It sees that there was a possible range access on IDX2. It tries to
   construct it by calling SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(), but alas,
   SQL_SELECT::cond doesn't have all parts of WHERE anymore.
   So it uses full index scan which is slow.

(The execution works fine because there's code further in test_if_skip_sort_order()
which "Unpushes" the index condition and restores the original WHERE clause.
It was just the test_quick_select call that suffered).
2018-09-12 16:58:30 +03:00
1bf3e8ab43 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2018-09-11 21:31:03 +03:00
31081593aa Merge branch '11.0' into 10.1 2018-09-06 22:45:19 +02:00
0ccba62db3 MDEV-16465 Invalid (old?) table or database name or hang in ha_innobase::delete_table and log semaphore wait upon concurrent DDL with foreign keys
lowercase db and table names before prelocking.

Post-fix for 9180e8666b

This fixes failures on main.lowercase_table4 on Windows
2018-09-06 01:30:10 +02:00
7830fb7f45 Merge 10.2 into 10.3 2018-08-28 12:22:56 +03:00
9258097fa3 Merge 10.1 into 10.2 2018-08-21 15:20:34 +03:00
862a97749d MDEV-17011 “condition_pushdown_for_derived” optimization not used when
using INSERT INTO

This patch allows condition pushdown into a materialized derived / view when
this table is used in INSERT SELECT, multi-table UPDATE and multi-table DELETE.
2018-08-17 19:29:01 -07:00
34c7222c08 Fixed that -DDBUG_ASSERT_AS_PRINTF works again
Note that this option was only designed to work on binaries
compiled without DBUG.
2018-08-16 17:40:23 +03:00
734db318ac Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2018-08-16 10:08:30 +03:00
befc09f002 MDEV-16722: Assertion `type() != NULL_ITEM' failed
We hit this assert during the create of a temporary table field
because the current code does not handle the case when the value
of the NAME_CONST function is NULL.
Fixed this by allowing creation of temporary table fields even
for the case when NAME_CONST returns NULL value.
Introduced tmp_table_field_from_field_type_maybe_null() function
in Item class so both Item_basic_value and Item_name_const can use it.
Introduced a virtual method get_func_item() in the Item class.
2018-08-12 12:09:56 +05:30
9419908f38 MDEV-15433: Optimizer does not use group by optimization with distinct
After the commit b76b69cd5f
loose index scan for queries with DISTINCT stopped working.
That is why that commit has to be reverted.
Additionally this patch  fixes the problem of MDEV-10880.
2018-08-05 13:25:40 +03:00
05459706f2 Merge 10.2 into 10.3 2018-08-03 15:57:23 +03:00
980aa3e71d MDEV-16888 Add virtual Type_handler::cond_notnull_field_isnull_to_field_eq_zero() 2018-08-03 07:55:50 +04:00
ef3070e997 Merge 10.1 into 10.2 2018-08-02 08:19:57 +03:00
865e807125 Merge branch '10.0' into 10.1 2018-07-31 11:58:29 +02:00
91181b225c Merge 5.5 into 10.0 2018-07-30 15:09:25 +03:00
bd0b368119 Fix added along with a test for a case missed in the patch for MDEV-16751 2018-07-27 11:34:34 +05:30
3c141e319a MDEV-15087 Item_func::fix_fields:
Assertion `used_tables_cache == 0' failed

This bug manifested itself when executing queries
over materialized derived tables /vies and with
conjunctive always true predicates containing
inexpensive single-row subqueries.
This bug disappeared after the patch mdev-15035
had been applied.
2018-07-25 23:29:48 -07:00
93b6552182 Merge 10.2 into 10.3 2018-07-26 09:19:52 +03:00
189157d052 Merge branch '10.1' into bb-10.1-merge-sanja 2018-07-26 06:34:33 +02:00
cb5952b506 Merge branch '10.0' into bb-10.1-merge-sanja 2018-07-25 22:24:40 +02:00
aad70e9b4c MDEV-16820 Lost 'Impossible where' from query with inexpensive subquery
This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
is considered as expensive.
It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
optimize_constant_subqueries().
2018-07-25 11:58:19 -07:00
f9b43c2565 MDEV-16751: Server crashes in st_join_table::cleanup or TABLE_LIST::is_with_table_recursive_reference
with join_cache_level>2

During muliple equality propagation for a query in which we have an IN subquery, the items in the select list of the
subquery may not be part of the multiple equality because there might be another occurence of the same field in the
where clause of the subquery.
So we keyuse_is_valid_for_access_in_chosen_plan function which expects the items in the select list of the subquery to
be same to the ones in the multiple equality (through these multiple equalities we create keyuse array).
The solution would be that we expect the same field not the same Item because when we have SEMI JOIN MATERIALIZATION SCAN,
we use copy back technique to copies back the materialised table fields to the original fields of the base tables.
2018-07-25 14:20:16 +05:30
1fde449f1d MDEV-16820 Lost 'Impossible where' from query with inexpensive subquery
This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
is considered as expensive.
It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
optimize_constant_subqueries().
2018-07-24 23:53:12 -07:00
c631060713 MDEV-16820 Lost 'Impossible where' from query with inexpensive subquery
This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
is considered as expensive.
It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
optimize_constant_subqueries().
2018-07-24 23:45:55 -07:00