When binlog is disabled, WSREP will not behave correctly when
SAVEPOINT ROLLBACK is executed since we don't register handlers for such case.
Fixed by registering WSREP handlerton for SAVEPOINT related commands.
MDEV-19964 S3 replication support
Added new configure options:
s3_slave_ignore_updates
"If the slave has shares same S3 storage as the master"
s3_replicate_alter_as_create_select
"When converting S3 table to local table, log all rows in binary log"
This allows on to configure slaves to have the S3 storage shared or
independent from the master.
Other thing:
Added new session variable '@@sql_if_exists' to force IF_EXIST to DDL's.
* Remove dead code
* MDEV-21675 Data inconsistency after multirow insert rollback
This patch fixes data inconsistencies that happen after rollback of
multirow inserts, with binlog disabled.
For example, statements such as `INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,'a'),(1,'b')`
that fail with duplicate key error. In such cases the whole statement
is rolled back. However, with wsrep_emulate_binlog in effect, the
IO_CACHE would not be truncated, and the pending rows events would be
replicated to the rest of the cluster. In the above example, it would
result in row (1,'a') being replicated, whereas locally the statement
is rolled back entirely. Making the cluster inconsistent.
The patch changes the code so that prior to statement rollback,
pending rows event are removed and the stmt cache reset.
That patch also introduces MTR tests that excercise multirow insert
statements for regular, and streaming replication.
When connections go to same node and deadlock happens, BF abort should
not happen for victim thread. Fixed by guarding
`wsrep_handle_SR_rollback()` so that is called only for SR transactions.
Co-authored-by: Seppo Jaakola <seppo.jaakola@iki.fi>
Co-authored-by: Daniele Sciascia <daniele.sciascia@galeracluster.com>
If async replication slave thread conflicts with cluster replication,
then the async slave transaction should be BF aborted, and depending on the
state of async slave transaction execution, potentially also replayed.
There were problems in such BF abort implementation and the replaying was not
started.
This pull request contains fixes which make sure that if async slave thread is
marked to abort and replay, it will complete carry out the rollback and
release all locks and resources before starting the replaying. After replaying,
async slave transactions is treated as successful, so the slave thread will
continue as usual, handling next replication event.
There is also new mtr test: galera.galera_slave_replay, which stresses both a
certification failure for async slave thread and a successful BF abort
followed by replaying.
* Remove those tests that will not be supported on that release.
* Make sure that correct tests are disabled and have MDEVs
* Sort test names
This should not be merged upwards.
* Remove those tests that will not be supported on that release.
* Make sure that correct tests are disabled and have MDEVs
* Sort test names
This should not be merged upwards.
* Remove those tests that will not be supported on that release.
* Make sure that correct tests are disabled and have MDEVs
* Sort test names
This should not be merged upwards.
Introduced a new wsrep_strict_ddl configuration variable in which
Galera checks storage engine of the effected table. If table is not
InnoDB (only storage engine currently fully supporting Galera
replication) DDL-statement will return error code:
ER_GALERA_REPLICATION_NOT_SUPPORTED
eng "DDL-statement is forbidden as table storage engine does not support Galera replication"
However, when wsrep_replicate_myisam=ON we allow DDL-statements to
MyISAM tables. If effected table is allowed storage engine Galera
will run normal TOI.
This new setting should be for now set globally on all
nodes in a cluster. When this setting is set following DDL-clauses
accessing tables not supporting Galera replication are refused:
* CREATE TABLE (e.g. CREATE TABLE t1(a int) engine=Aria
* ALTER TABLE
* TRUNCATE TABLE
* CREATE VIEW
* CREATE TRIGGER
* CREATE INDEX
* DROP INDEX
* RENAME TABLE
* DROP TABLE
Statements on PROCEDURE, EVENT, FUNCTION are allowed as effected
tables are known only at execution. Furthermore, USER, ROLE, SERVER,
DATABASE statements are also allowed as they do not really have
effected table.
* Remove those tests that will not be supported on that release.
* Make sure that correct tests are disabled and have MDEVs
* Sort test names
This should not be merged upwards.
* Remove those tests that will not be supported on that release.
* Make sure that correct tests are disabled and have MDEVs
* Sort test names
This should not be merged upwards.
Function `signal_waiters` assigned `m_committed_seqno` variable outside of
mutex lock which caused incorrect behavior of WSREP_SYNC_WAIT_UPTO_GTID.
Fixed by moving assignment inside lock. Added handling of OOM and now
error is reported.
Remove hard-coded seqno value and read seqno directly from current node state.
Support for galera GTID consistency thru cluster. All nodes in cluster
should have same GTID for replicated events which are originating from cluster.
Cluster originating commands need to contain sequential WSREP GTID seqno
Ignore manual setting of gtid_seq_no=X.
In master-slave scenario where master is non galera node replicated GTID is
replicated and is preserved in all nodes.
To have this - domain_id, server_id and seqnos should be same on all nodes.
Node which bootstraps the cluster, to achieve this, sends domain_id and
server_id to other nodes and this combination is used to write GTID for events
that are replicated inside cluster.
Cluster nodes that are executing non replicated events are going to have different
GTID than replicated ones, difference will be visible in domain part of gtid.
With wsrep_gtid_domain_id you can set domain_id for WSREP cluster.
Functions WSREP_LAST_WRITTEN_GTID, WSREP_LAST_SEEN_GTID and
WSREP_SYNC_WAIT_UPTO_GTID now works with "native" GTID format.
Fixed galera tests to reflect this chances.
Add variable to manually update WSREP GTID seqno in cluster
Add variable to manipulate and change WSREP GTID seqno. Next command
originating from cluster and on same thread will have set seqno and
cluster should change their internal counter to it's value.
Behavior is same as using @@gtid_seq_no for non WSREP transaction.
