SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.
-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.
-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
Fix by Sergey Petrunia.
This patch only prevents the evaluation of expensive subqueries during optimization.
The crash reported in this bug has been fixed by some other patch.
The fix is to call value->is_null() only when !value->is_expensive(), because is_null()
may trigger evaluation of the Item, which in turn triggers subquery evaluation if the
Item is a subquery.
In 10.0, VIO timeouts can be in milliseconds, so we add a new function
mysql_get_timeout_value_ms() which can return millisecond-precision
timeout values.
In 5.5, we do not have millisecond precision for timeouts. But we still
provide the mysql_get_timeout_value_ms() function; this makes it easier
for applications as they can use the millisecond function in 10.0 and
still work with the 5.5 version of the client library.
This bug had two problems:
P1) Reads out of bounds;
P2) Writes out of bounds.
PROBLEM P1
----------
User_var_log_event unmarshalling from binlog was not performing range
checks when using name_len and val_len variables to walk on event
buffer.
Added range checks to User_var_log_event unmarshalling to prevent
unmarshalling errors.
PROBLEM P2
----------
User_var_log_event value was allocated on thread stack, what caused
stack frame errors when User_var_log_event value was bigger than thread
stack size.
Currently value is allocated on heap memory.
.. into MariaDB 5.3
Fix for Bug#12667154 SAME QUERY EXEC AS WHERE SUBQ GIVES DIFFERENT
RESULTS ON IN() & NOT IN() COMP #3
This bug causes a wrong result in mysql-trunk when ICP is used
and bad performance in mysql-5.5 and mysql-trunk.
Using the query from bug report to explain what happens and causes
the wrong result from the query when ICP is enabled:
1. The t3 table contains four records. The outer query will read
these and for each of these it will execute the subquery.
2. Before the first execution of the subquery it will be optimized. In
this case the important is what happens to the first table t1:
-make_join_select() will call the range optimizer which decides
that t1 should be accessed using a range scan on the k1 index
It creates a QUICK_RANGE_SELECT object for this.
-As the last part of optimization the ICP code pushes the
condition down to the storage engine for table t1 on the k1 index.
This produces the following information in the explain for this table:
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t1 range k1 k1 5 NULL 3 Using index condition; Using filesort
Note the use of filesort.
3. The first execution of the subquery does (among other things) due
to the need for sorting:
a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys():
b. find_all_keys() will read the required keys for all qualifying
rows from the storage engine. To do this it checks if it has a
quick-select for the table. It will use the quick-select for
reading records. In this case it will read four records from the
storage engine (based on the range criteria). The storage engine
will evaluate the pushed index condition for each record.
c. At the end of create_sort_index() there is code that cleans up a
lot of stuff on the join tab. One of the things that is cleaned
is the select object. The result of this is that the
quick-select object created in make_join_select is deleted.
4. The second execution of the subquery does the same as the first but
the result is different:
a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys()
(same as for the first execution)
b. find_all_keys() will read the keys from the storage engine. To
do this it checks if it has a quick-select for the table. Now
there is NO quick-select object(!) (since it was deleted in
step 3c). So find_all_keys defaults to read the table using a
table scan instead. So instead of reading the four relevant records
in the range it reads the entire table (6 records). It then
evaluates the table's condition (and here it goes wrong). Since
the entire condition has been pushed down to the storage engine
using ICP all 6 records qualify. (Note that the storage engine
will not evaluate the pushed index condition in this case since
it was pushed for the k1 index and now we do a table scan
without any index being used).
The result is that here we return six qualifying key values
instead of four due to not evaluating the table's condition.
c. As above.
5. The two last execution of the subquery will also produce wrong results
for the same reason.
Summary: The problem occurs due to all but the first executions of the
subquery is done as a table scan without evaluating the table's
condition (which is pushed to the storage engine on a different
index). This is caused by the create_sort_index() function deleting
the quick-select object that should have been used for executing the
subquery as a range scan.
Note that this bug in addition to causing wrong results also can
result in bad performance due to executing the subquery using a table
scan instead of a range scan. This is an issue in MySQL 5.5.
The fix for this problem is to avoid that the Quick-select-object that
the optimizer created is deleted when create_sort_index() is doing
clean-up of the join-tab. This will ensure that the quick-select
object and the corresponding pushed index condition will be available
and used by all following executions of the subquery.
The problem is in the error handling in row_create_table_for_mysql().
In the 'disk full' case we may forget to call dict_mem_table_free() on
the table object.
Approved by: Marko (rb:1377 and rb:1386)
PRIVILEGES
Description: (user,host) pair from security context is used
privilege checking at the time of granting or
revoking proxy privileges. This creates problem
when server is started with
--skip-name-resolve option because host will not
contain any value. Checks should be dependent on
consistent values regardless the way server is
started. Further, privilege check should use
(priv_user,priv_host) pair rather than values
obtained from inbound connection because
this pair represents the correct account context
obtained from mysql.user table.
CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION
A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot. After
the transaction is started new indexes are added to the
table. Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
chooses an index. When the index scan is being initialized
via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports
the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message
stating that "insufficient history for index".
This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer. But
the my_error() api is never called. The statement level
diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error
status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).
Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
fails.
516 case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
517 default:
518 DBUG_ASSERT(0);
519 error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
520 break;
The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652
and 11746399.
14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED
rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.
We did not allocate enough bits for index->trx_id_offset, causing an
UPDATE or DELETE of a table with a PRIMARY KEY longer than 1024 bytes
to corrupt the PRIMARY KEY.
dict_index_t: Allocate enough bits.
dict_index_build_internal_clust(): Check for overflow of
index->trx_id_offset. Trip a debug assertion when overflow occurs.
rb:1380 approved by Jimmy Yang
cmake/cpack_rpm.cmake:
* mark all cnf files with %config(noreplace)
* add the forgotten postun script
sql/sys_vars.cc:
0 for a string variable means "no default. But datadir has the default value.
support-files/rpm/server-postin.sh:
* use mysqld --help to determine the correct datadir in the presence of my.cnf files
(better than my_print_defaults, because it considers the correct group set).
* Only create users, and chown/chmod if it's a fresh install, not an upgrade.
* only run mysql_install_db if datadir does not exist
- Wrong thd uses in Item_subselect, could lead to crash
- Inititalize uninitialized variable in new autoincrement handling code
sql/handler.cc:
More DBUG_PRINT
sql/item_subselect.cc:
Wrong thd uses in Item_subselect, could lead to crash
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Initialize variable needed by upper level. This only happens when auto-increment value wraps over.
storage/xtradb/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Initialize variable needed by upper level. This only happens when auto-increment value wraps over.
When a SP handler is activated, memory is allocated to hold the
MESSAGE_TEXT for the condition that caused the activation.
The problem was that this memory was allocated on the MEM_ROOT belonging
to the stored program. Since this MEM_ROOT is not freed until the
stored program ends, a stored program that causes lots of handler
activations can start using lots of memory. In 5.1 and earlier the
problem did not exist as no MESSAGE_TEXT was allocated if a condition
was raised with a handler present. However, this behavior lead to
a number of other issues such as Bug#23032.
This patch fixes the problem by allocating enough memory for the
necessary MESSAGE_TEXTs in the SP MEM_ROOT when the SP starts and
then re-using this memory each time a handler is activated.
This is the 5.5 version of the patch.
