KEY NO 0 FOR TABLE IN ERROR LOG
With the changes made by the patches for Bug#11751388 and
Bug#11784056, concurrent reads are allowed while secondary
indexes are created in InnoDB. This means that the metadata
lock on the affected table is not upgraded to exclusive
until the .FRM is updated at the end of ALTER TABLE processing.
The problem was that if this lock upgrade failed for some
reason (e.g. timeout), the index information in the server
and inside InnoDB would be out of sync. This would happen
since the add index operation already was committed inside
InnoDB but the table metadata inside the server had not been
updated yet.
This patch fixes the problem by (for now) reverting the
effects of the patches for Bug#11751388 and Bug#11784056.
Concurrent reads will now again be blocked during creation
of secondary indexes in InnoDB.
Test case added to innodb_mysql_lock.test.
KEY NO 0 FOR TABLE IN ERROR LOG
With the changes made by the patches for Bug#11751388 and
Bug#11784056, concurrent reads are allowed while secondary
indexes are created in InnoDB. This means that the metadata
lock on the affected table is not upgraded to exclusive
until the .FRM is updated at the end of ALTER TABLE processing.
The problem was that if this lock upgrade failed for some
reason (e.g. timeout), the index information in the server
and inside InnoDB would be out of sync. This would happen
since the add index operation already was committed inside
InnoDB but the table metadata inside the server had not been
updated yet.
This patch fixes the problem by (for now) reverting the
effects of the patches for Bug#11751388 and Bug#11784056.
Concurrent reads will now again be blocked during creation
of secondary indexes in InnoDB.
Test case added to innodb_mysql_lock.test.
NON-PRIMARY UNIQUE INDEX USING INNODB
This patch adds the HA_INPLACE_ADD_UNIQUE_INDEX_NO_WRITE
capability flag to InnoDB, indicating that concurrent reads
can be allowed while non-primary unique indexes are created.
This is an follow-up to Bug #11751388 which enabled concurrent
reads when creating non-primary non-unique indexes.
Test case added to innodb_mysql_sync.test.
NON-PRIMARY UNIQUE INDEX USING INNODB
This patch adds the HA_INPLACE_ADD_UNIQUE_INDEX_NO_WRITE
capability flag to InnoDB, indicating that concurrent reads
can be allowed while non-primary unique indexes are created.
This is an follow-up to Bug #11751388 which enabled concurrent
reads when creating non-primary non-unique indexes.
Test case added to innodb_mysql_sync.test.
Bug #11766501: Multiple RBS break the get rseg with mininum trx_t::no code during purge
Bug# 59291 changes:
Main problem is that truncating the UNDO log at the completion of every
trx_purge() call is expensive as the number of rollback segments is increased.
We truncate after a configurable amount of pages. The innodb_purge_batch_size
parameter is used to control when InnoDB does the actual truncate. The truncate
is done once after 128 (or TRX_SYS_N_RSEGS iterations). In other words we
truncate after purge 128 * innodb_purge_batch_size. The smaller the batch
size the quicker we truncate.
Introduce a new parameter that allows how many rollback segments to use for
storing REDO information. This is really step 1 in allowing complete control
to the user over rollback space management.
New parameters:
i) innodb_rollback_segments = number of rollback_segments to use
(default is now 128) dynamic parameter, can be changed anytime.
Currently there is little benefit in changing it from the default.
Optimisations in the patch.
i. Change the O(n) behaviour of trx_rseg_get_on_id() to O(log n)
Backported from 5.6. Refactor some of the binary heap code.
Create a new include/ut0bh.ic file.
ii. Avoid truncating the rollback segments after every purge.
Related changes that were moved to a separate patch:
i. Purge should not do any flushing, only wait for space to be free so that
it only does purging of records unless it is held up by a long running
transaction that is preventing it from progressing.
ii. Give the purge thread preference over transactions when acquiring the
rseg->mutex during commit. This to avoid purge blocking unnecessarily
when getting the next rollback segment to purge.
Bug #11766501 changes:
Add the rseg to the min binary heap under the cover of the kernel mutex and
the binary heap mutex. This ensures the ordering of the min binary heap.
The two changes have to be committed together because they share the same
that fixes both issues.
rb://567 Approved by: Inaam Rana.
Bug #11766501: Multiple RBS break the get rseg with mininum trx_t::no code during purge
Bug# 59291 changes:
Main problem is that truncating the UNDO log at the completion of every
trx_purge() call is expensive as the number of rollback segments is increased.
We truncate after a configurable amount of pages. The innodb_purge_batch_size
parameter is used to control when InnoDB does the actual truncate. The truncate
is done once after 128 (or TRX_SYS_N_RSEGS iterations). In other words we
truncate after purge 128 * innodb_purge_batch_size. The smaller the batch
size the quicker we truncate.
Introduce a new parameter that allows how many rollback segments to use for
storing REDO information. This is really step 1 in allowing complete control
to the user over rollback space management.
New parameters:
i) innodb_rollback_segments = number of rollback_segments to use
(default is now 128) dynamic parameter, can be changed anytime.
Currently there is little benefit in changing it from the default.
Optimisations in the patch.
i. Change the O(n) behaviour of trx_rseg_get_on_id() to O(log n)
Backported from 5.6. Refactor some of the binary heap code.
Create a new include/ut0bh.ic file.
ii. Avoid truncating the rollback segments after every purge.
Related changes that were moved to a separate patch:
i. Purge should not do any flushing, only wait for space to be free so that
it only does purging of records unless it is held up by a long running
transaction that is preventing it from progressing.
ii. Give the purge thread preference over transactions when acquiring the
rseg->mutex during commit. This to avoid purge blocking unnecessarily
when getting the next rollback segment to purge.
Bug #11766501 changes:
Add the rseg to the min binary heap under the cover of the kernel mutex and
the binary heap mutex. This ensures the ordering of the min binary heap.
The two changes have to be committed together because they share the same
that fixes both issues.
rb://567 Approved by: Inaam Rana.
that implement add_index
The problem was that ALTER TABLE blocked reads on an InnoDB table
while adding a secondary index, even if this was not needed. It is
only needed for the final step where the .frm file is updated.
The reason queries were blocked, was that ALTER TABLE upgraded the
metadata lock from MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE (which blocks writes) to
MDL_EXCLUSIVE (which blocks all accesses) before index creation.
The way the server handles index creation, is that storage engines
publish their capabilities to the server and the server determines
which of the following three ways this can be handled: 1) build a
new version of the table; 2) change the existing table but with
exclusive metadata lock; 3) change the existing table but without
metadata lock upgrade.
For InnoDB and secondary index creation, option 3) should have been
selected. However this failed for two reasons. First, InnoDB did
not publish this capability properly.
Second, the ALTER TABLE code failed to made proper use of the
information supplied by the storage engine. A variable
need_lock_for_indexes was set accordingly, but was not later used.
This patch fixes this problem by only doing metadata lock upgrade
before index creation/deletion if this variable has been set.
This patch also changes some of the related terminology used
in the code. Specifically the use of "fast" and "online" with
respect to ALTER TABLE. "Fast" was used to indicate that an
ALTER TABLE operation could be done without involving a
temporary table. "Fast" has been renamed "in-place" to more
accurately describe the behavior.
"Online" meant that the operation could be done without taking
a table lock. However, in the current implementation writes
are always prohibited during ALTER TABLE and an exclusive
metadata lock is held while updating the .frm, so ALTER TABLE
is not completely online. This patch replaces "online" with
"in-place", with additional comments indicating if concurrent
reads are allowed during index creation/deletion or not.
An important part of this update of terminology is renaming
of the handler flags used by handlers to indicate if index
creation/deletion can be done in-place and if concurrent reads
are allowed. For example, the HA_ONLINE_ADD_INDEX_NO_WRITES
flag has been renamed to HA_INPLACE_ADD_INDEX_NO_READ_WRITE,
while HA_ONLINE_ADD_INDEX is now HA_INPLACE_ADD_INDEX_NO_WRITE.
Note that this is a rename to clarify current behavior, the
flag values have not changed and no flags have been removed or
added.
Test case added to innodb_mysql_sync.test.
that implement add_index
The problem was that ALTER TABLE blocked reads on an InnoDB table
while adding a secondary index, even if this was not needed. It is
only needed for the final step where the .frm file is updated.
The reason queries were blocked, was that ALTER TABLE upgraded the
metadata lock from MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE (which blocks writes) to
MDL_EXCLUSIVE (which blocks all accesses) before index creation.
The way the server handles index creation, is that storage engines
publish their capabilities to the server and the server determines
which of the following three ways this can be handled: 1) build a
new version of the table; 2) change the existing table but with
exclusive metadata lock; 3) change the existing table but without
metadata lock upgrade.
For InnoDB and secondary index creation, option 3) should have been
selected. However this failed for two reasons. First, InnoDB did
not publish this capability properly.
Second, the ALTER TABLE code failed to made proper use of the
information supplied by the storage engine. A variable
need_lock_for_indexes was set accordingly, but was not later used.
This patch fixes this problem by only doing metadata lock upgrade
before index creation/deletion if this variable has been set.
This patch also changes some of the related terminology used
in the code. Specifically the use of "fast" and "online" with
respect to ALTER TABLE. "Fast" was used to indicate that an
ALTER TABLE operation could be done without involving a
temporary table. "Fast" has been renamed "in-place" to more
accurately describe the behavior.
"Online" meant that the operation could be done without taking
a table lock. However, in the current implementation writes
are always prohibited during ALTER TABLE and an exclusive
metadata lock is held while updating the .frm, so ALTER TABLE
is not completely online. This patch replaces "online" with
"in-place", with additional comments indicating if concurrent
reads are allowed during index creation/deletion or not.
An important part of this update of terminology is renaming
of the handler flags used by handlers to indicate if index
creation/deletion can be done in-place and if concurrent reads
are allowed. For example, the HA_ONLINE_ADD_INDEX_NO_WRITES
flag has been renamed to HA_INPLACE_ADD_INDEX_NO_READ_WRITE,
while HA_ONLINE_ADD_INDEX is now HA_INPLACE_ADD_INDEX_NO_WRITE.
Note that this is a rename to clarify current behavior, the
flag values have not changed and no flags have been removed or
added.
Test case added to innodb_mysql_sync.test.
"rows examined" estimates". This change implements "innodb_stats_method"
with options of "nulls_equal", "nulls_unequal" and "null_ignored".
rb://553 approved by Marko
"rows examined" estimates". This change implements "innodb_stats_method"
with options of "nulls_equal", "nulls_unequal" and "null_ignored".
rb://553 approved by Marko
This adds 64 new rows to performance_schema.rwlock_instances.
This patch will make perfschema.binlog_mix perfschema.binlog_row tests fail,
but they will be fixed by http://lists.mysql.com/commits/127862
Approved by: Jimmy (rb://554)
This adds 64 new rows to performance_schema.rwlock_instances.
This patch will make perfschema.binlog_mix perfschema.binlog_row tests fail,
but they will be fixed by http://lists.mysql.com/commits/127862
Approved by: Jimmy (rb://554)
InnoDB does not attempt to handle lower_case_table_names == 2 when looking
up foreign table names and referenced table name. It turned that server
variable into a boolean and ignored the possibility of it being '2'.
The setting lower_case_table_names == 2 means that it should be stored and
displayed in mixed case as given, but compared internally in lower case.
Normally the server deals with this since it stores table names. But
InnoDB stores referential constraints for the server, so it needs to keep
track of both lower case and given names.
This solution creates two table name pointers for each foreign and referenced
table name. One to display the name, and one to look it up. Both pointers
point to the same allocated string unless this setting is 2. So the overhead
added is not too much.
Two functions are created in dict0mem.c to populate the ..._lookup versions
of these pointers. Both dict_mem_foreign_table_name_lookup_set() and
dict_mem_referenced_table_name_lookup_set() are called 5 times each.
InnoDB does not attempt to handle lower_case_table_names == 2 when looking
up foreign table names and referenced table name. It turned that server
variable into a boolean and ignored the possibility of it being '2'.
The setting lower_case_table_names == 2 means that it should be stored and
displayed in mixed case as given, but compared internally in lower case.
Normally the server deals with this since it stores table names. But
InnoDB stores referential constraints for the server, so it needs to keep
track of both lower case and given names.
This solution creates two table name pointers for each foreign and referenced
table name. One to display the name, and one to look it up. Both pointers
point to the same allocated string unless this setting is 2. So the overhead
added is not too much.
Two functions are created in dict0mem.c to populate the ..._lookup versions
of these pointers. Both dict_mem_foreign_table_name_lookup_set() and
dict_mem_referenced_table_name_lookup_set() are called 5 times each.
Code cleanup after changes for Bug 56628. The general approach for
InnoDB is to make a reference to each enum value whenever it is used in a
switch statement. In addition, no default case should be used for switch
statements on enum types. This assures that if there is ever any change
in the enum values, the switch will need to change to reflect it since a
compiler warning will occur. In this case, the enum row_type is declared
in handler.h and could be changed for another storage engine. If so, a
warning will occur in the InnoDB build.
Other changes;
* This patch uses 2 macros to help consolidate warning messages that
need to occur twice in the single switch for row_format.
* Using row_format as the variable name to distinguish it from the enum
type.
* Function declaration format correction.
Code cleanup after changes for Bug 56628. The general approach for
InnoDB is to make a reference to each enum value whenever it is used in a
switch statement. In addition, no default case should be used for switch
statements on enum types. This assures that if there is ever any change
in the enum values, the switch will need to change to reflect it since a
compiler warning will occur. In this case, the enum row_type is declared
in handler.h and could be changed for another storage engine. If so, a
warning will occur in the InnoDB build.
Other changes;
* This patch uses 2 macros to help consolidate warning messages that
need to occur twice in the single switch for row_format.
* Using row_format as the variable name to distinguish it from the enum
type.
* Function declaration format correction.
