in EXPLAIN as select_type==MATERIALIZED.
Before, we had select_type==SUBQUERY and it was difficult to tell materialized
subqueries from uncorrelated scalar-context subqueries.
The cause of the wrong result was that Item_ref_null_helper::get_date()
didn't use a method of the *_result() family, and fetched the data
for the field from the current row instead of result_field. Changed to
use the correct *_result() method, like to all other similar methods
of Item_ref_null_helper.
Analysis:
lp:894397 was a consequence of a prior incorrect fix of lp:833777
which didn't take into account that even when all tables are
constant there may be correlated conditions, and the where clause
is not equivalent to the constant conditions.
Solution:
When there are constant tables only, evaluate only the conditions
that reference outer fields, because the constant conditions are
already checked, and the where clause doesn't have other conditions
than constant ones, and outer referencing ones. The fix for
lp:894397 also fixes lp:833777.
The problem was that when we have single row subquery with no rows
Item_cache(es) which represent result row was not null and being
requested via element_index() returned random value.
The fix is setting all Item_cache(es) in NULL before executing the
query (reset() method) which guaranty NULL value of whole query
or its elements requested in any way if no rows was found.
set_null() method was added to Item_cache to guaranty correct NULL
value in case of reseting the cache.
- Make EXPLAIN display "Start temporary" at the start of the fanout (it used to display
at the first table whose rowid gets into temp. table which is not that useful for
the user)
- Updated test results (all checked)
Stop attempts to apply IN/ALL/ANY optimizations to so called "fake_select"
(used for ordering and filtering results of union) in union subquery execution.
Analysis:
The optimizer distinguishes two kinds of 'constant' conditions:
expensive ones, and non-expensive ones. The non-expensive conditions
are evaluated inside make_join_select(), and if false, already the
optimizer detects empty query results.
In order to avoid arbitrarily expensive optimization, the evaluation of
expensive constant conditions is delayed until execution. These conditions
are attached to JOIN::exec_const_cond and evaluated in the beginning of
JOIN::exec. The relevant execution logic is:
JOIN::exec()
{
if (! join->exec_const_cond->val_int())
{
produce an empty result;
stop execution
}
continue execution
execute the original WHERE clause (that contains exec_const_cond)
...
}
As a result, when an expensive constant condition is
TRUE, it is evaluated twice - once through
JOIN::exec_const_cond, and once through JOIN::cond.
When the expensive constant condition is a subquery,
predicate, the subquery is evaluated twice. If we have
many levels of subqueries, this logic results in a chain
of recursive subquery executions that walk a perfect
binary tree. The result is that for subquries with depth N,
JOIN::exec is executed O(2^N) times.
Solution:
Notice that the second execution of the constant conditions
happens inside do_select(), in the branch:
if (join->table_count == join->const_tables) { ... }
In this case exec_const_cond is equivalent to the whole WHERE
clause, therefore the WHERE clause has already been checked in
the beginnig of JOIN::exec, and has been found to be true.
The bug is addressed by not evaluating the WHERE clause if there
was exec_const_conds, and it was TRUE.
If the optimizer switch 'semijoin_with_cache' is set to 'off' then
join cache cannot be used to join inner tables of a semijoin.
Also fixed a bug in the function check_join_cache_usage() that led
to wrong output of the EXPLAIN commands for some test cases.
In MariaDB, when running in ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode,
the server produced in incorrect error message that there
is an aggregate function without GROUP BY, for artificially
created MIN/MAX functions during subquery MIN/MAX optimization.
The fix introduces a way to distinguish between artifially
created MIN/MAX functions as a result of a rewrite, and normal
ones present in the query. The test for ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY violation
now tests in addition if a MIN/MAX function was part of a MIN/MAX
subquery rewrite.
In order to be able to distinguish these MIN/MAX functions, the
patch introduces an additional flag in Item_in_subselect::in_strategy -
SUBS_STRATEGY_CHOSEN. This flag is set when the optimizer makes its
final choice of a subuqery strategy. In order to make the choice
consistent, access to Item_in_subselect::in_strategy is provided
via new class methods.
******
Fix MySQL BUG#12329653
In MariaDB, when running in ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY mode,
the server produced in incorrect error message that there
is an aggregate function without GROUP BY, for artificially
created MIN/MAX functions during subquery MIN/MAX optimization.
The fix introduces a way to distinguish between artifially
created MIN/MAX functions as a result of a rewrite, and normal
ones present in the query. The test for ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY violation
now tests in addition if a MIN/MAX function was part of a MIN/MAX
subquery rewrite.
In order to be able to distinguish these MIN/MAX functions, the
patch introduces an additional flag in Item_in_subselect::in_strategy -
SUBS_STRATEGY_CHOSEN. This flag is set when the optimizer makes its
final choice of a subuqery strategy. In order to make the choice
consistent, access to Item_in_subselect::in_strategy is provided
via new class methods.
Analysis:
Equality propagation propagated the constant '7' into
args[0] of the Item_in_optimizer that stands for the
"< ANY" predicate. At the same the min/max subquery
rewrite swapped the order of the left and right operands
of the "<" predicate, but used Item_in_subselect::left_expr.
As a result, when the <ANY predicate is executed early in the
execution phase as a contant condition, instead of a constant
right (swapped) argument of the < predicate, there was a field
(t3.a). This field had no data, since the whole predicate is
considered constant, and it is evaluated before any tables are
read. Having junk in the field row buffer produced wrong result
Solution:
Fix create_swap to pick the correct Item_in_optimizer left
argument.
sql/sql_insert.cc:
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
******
CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS may do nothing, but
it is still not a failure. don't forget to my_ok it.
sql/sql_table.cc:
small cleanup
******
small cleanup
ALL subquery should return TRUE if subquery rowa set is empty independently
of left part. The problem was that Item_func_(eq,ne,gt,ge,lt,le) do not
call execution of second argument if first is NULL no in this case subquery
will not be executed and when Item_func_not_all calls any_value() of the
subquery or aggregation function which report that there was rows. So for
NULL < ALL (SELECT...) result was FALSE instead of TRUE.
Fix is just swapping of arguments of Item_func_(eq,ne,gt,ge,lt,le) (with
changing the operation if it is needed) so that result will be the same
(for examole a < b is equal to b > a). This fix exploit the fact that
first argument will be executed in any case.
For ANY subqueries NULLs should be ignored (if there is other values) when finding max min.
For ALL subqueries NULLs should be saved if they found.
Optimisation for ALL suqbueries if NULL is possible in the SELECT list with max/min aggregate function switched off.
Some test changed where NULL is not used but optimization with max/min aggregate function important so NOT NULL added.
mysql-test/r/explain.result:
Forced old optimization.
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
Forced old optimization.
New test suite.
mysql-test/t/explain.test:
Forced old optimization.
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
Forced old optimization.
New test suite.
sql/item_subselect.cc:
Store converted subquery type.
Switch off aggregate function optimisation for ALL and nulls.
sql/sql_class.cc:
Fixed NULL comparison.
sql/sql_class.h:
Store converted subquery type.
Analysis:
Constant table optimization of the outer query finds that
the right side of the equality is a constant that can
be used for an eq_ref access to fetch one row from t1,
and substitute t1 with a constant. Thus constant optimization
triggers evaluation of the subquery during the optimize
phase of the outer query.
The innermost subquery requires a plan with a temporary
table because with InnoDB tables the exact count of rows
is not known, and the empty tables cannot be optimzied
way. JOIN::exec for the innermost subquery substitutes
the subquery tables with a temporary table.
When EXPLAIN gets to print the tables in the innermost
subquery, EXPLAIN needs to print the name of each table
through the corresponding TABLE_LIST object. However,
the temporary table created during execution doesn't
have a corresponding TABLE_LIST, so we get a null
pointer exception.
Solution:
The solution is to forbid using expensive constant
expressions for eq_ref access for contant table
optimization. Notice that eq_ref with a subquery
providing the value is still possible during regular
execution.
When the WHERE/HAVING condition of a subquery has been transformed
by the optimizer the pointer stored the 'where'/'having' field
of the SELECT_LEX structure used for the subquery must be updated
accordingly. Otherwise the pointer may refer to an invalid item.
This can lead to the reported assertion failure for some queries
with correlated subqueries
The bug is a duplicate of MySQL's Bug#11764086,
however MySQL's fix is incomplete for MariaDB, so
this fix is slightly different.
In addition, this patch renames
Item_func_not_all::top_level() to is_top_level_item()
to make it in line with the analogous methods of
Item_in_optimizer, and Item_subselect.
Analysis:
It is possible to determine whether a predicate is
NULL-rejecting only if it is a top-level one. However,
this was not taken into account for Item_in_optimizer.
As a result, a NOT IN predicate was erroneously
considered as NULL-rejecting, and the NULL-complemented
rows generated by the outer join were rejected before
being checked by the NOT IN predicate.
Solution:
Change Item_in_optimizer to be considered as
NULL-rejecting only if it a top-level predicate.
Identified all test cases in the MySQL file subquery.inc that are
not present in MariaDB. This patch adds the test cases that are:
- not present in MySQL 5.5, and
- already fixed in MariaDB 5.3
The patch adds test cases for the following mysql-trunk bugs:
- Bug#12763207 - not a bug, mysql-trunk, added test case
- BUG#50257 - not a bug, mysql-trunk, added test case
- Bug 11765699 - not a bug, mysql-trunk, added test case
- BUG#12616253 - not a bug, mysql-trunk, added test case
The comparison was based on the following version of
mysql-trunk:
revno: 3350 [merge]
committer: Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@oracle.com>
branch nick: mysql-trunk
timestamp: Mon 2011-08-08 12:42:09 +0300
message:
Merge mysql-5.5 to mysql-trunk.
This bug is a special case of lp:813447.
Analysis:
Constant optimization finds that the condition t2.a = 1
can be used to access the primary key of table 't2'. As
a result both outer table t1,t2 are considered as constant
when we reach the execution phase. At the same time, during
constant optimization, the IN predicate is not evaluated
because it is expensive.
When execution of the outer query reaches do_select(),
control flow enter the branch:
if (join->table_count == join->const_tables)
{ ... }
This branch checks only the WHERE and HAVING clauses,
but doesn't check the ON clauses of the query. Since the
IN predicate was not evaluated during optimization, it is
not evaluated at all, thus execution doesn't detect that
the ON clause is FALSE.
Solution:
Similar to the patch for bug lp:813447, exclude system
tables from constant substitution based on unique key
lookups if there is an expensive ON condition on the
inner table.
ALL subquery should return TRUE if subquery rowa set is empty independently
of left part. The problem was that Item_func_(eq,ne,gt,ge,lt,le) do not
call execution of second argument if first is NULL no in this case subquery
will not be executed and when Item_func_not_all calls any_value() of the
subquery or aggregation function which report that there was rows. So for
NULL < ALL (SELECT...) result was FALSE instead of TRUE.
Fix is just swapping of arguments of Item_func_(eq,ne,gt,ge,lt,le) (with
changing the operation if it is needed) so that result will be the same
(for examole a < b is equal to b > a). This fix exploit the fact that
first argument will be executed in any case.
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_mat.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_opts.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_no_semijoin.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/r/subselect_scache.result:
The test suite added.
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
The test suite added.
sql/item_cmpfunc.cc:
Swap arguments creation methods added.
sql/item_cmpfunc.h:
Swap arguments creation methods added.
sql/item_subselect.cc:
Swap arguments of the comparison.
- Set the default
- Adjust the testcases so that 'new' tests are run with optimizations turned on.
- Pull out relevant tests from "irrelevant" tests and run them with optimizations on.
- Run range.test and innodb.test with both mrr=on and mrr=off
semijoin=on,firstmatch=on,loosescan=on
to
semijoin=off,firstmatch=off,loosescan=off
Adjust the testcases:
- Modify subselect*.test and join_cache.test so that all tests
use the same execution paths as before (i.e. optimizations that
are being tested are enabled)
- Let all other test files run with the new default settings (i.e.
with new optimizations disabled)
- Copy subquery testcases from these files into t/subselect_extra.test
which will run them with new optimizations enabled.
Analysis:
This bug consists of two related problems that are
result of too early evaluation of single-row subqueries
during the optimization phase of the outer query.
Several optimizer code paths try to evaluate single-row
subqueries in order to produce a constant and use that
constant for further optimzation.
When the execution of the subquery peforms destructive
changes to the representation of the subquery, and these
changes are not anticipated by the subsequent optimization
phases of the outer query, we tipically get a crash or
failed assert.
Specifically, in this bug the inner-most suqbuery with
DISTINCT triggers a substitution of the original JOIN
object by a single-table JOIN object with a temp table
needed to perform the DISTINCT operation (created by
JOIN::make_simple_join).
This substitution breaks EXPLAIN because:
a) in the first example JOIN::cleanup no longer can
reach the original table of the innermost subquery, and
close all indexes, and
b) in this second test query, EXPLAIN attempts to print
the name of the internal temp table, and crashes because
the temp table has no name (NULL pointer instead).
Solution:
a) fully disable subquery evaluation during optimization
in all cases - both for constant propagation and range
optimization, and
b) change JOIN::join_free() to perform cleanup irrespective
of EXPLAIN or not.
- JOIN::prepare would have set JOIN::table_count to incorrect value (bad merge of MWL 106)
- optimize_keyuse() would use table-bit as table number
(the change in optimize_keyuse is also the reason for query plan changes. Not
expected to have much effect because only handles cases of no index statistics)
- st_select_lex::register_dependency_item() ignored the fact that some of the
selects on the dependency paths could have been merged to their parents (because they
were mergeable VIEWs)
- Undo the incorrect fix in Item_subselect::recalc_used_tables(): do not call
fix_after_pullout() for Item_subselect::Ref_to_outside members.
When looking for the execution plan of a derived table to be materialized
JOIN::optimize finds out that all joined tables of the derived table
contain not more than one row then the derived table should be maretialized
at the optimization stage.
Added a test case for the bug.
Adjusted results in other test cases.
