ha_partition stores records in array of m_ordered_rec_buffer and uses
it for prio queue in ordered index scan. When the records are restored
from the array the blob buffers may be already freed or rewritten.
The solution is to take temporary ownership of cached blob buffers via
String::swap(). When the record is restored from m_ordered_rec_buffer
the ownership is returned to table fields.
Cleanups:
init_record_priority_queue(): removed needless !m_ordered_rec_buffer
check as there is same assertion few lines before.
dbug_print_row() for arbitrary row pointer
This is a 10.2+ part of a jira task
The two bugs regarding virtual column marking have been fixed:
1. UPDATE of a partitioned table, where the optimizer has chosen a
secondary index to make a filesort;
2. INSERT into a table with a nonblob field generated from a blob, with
binlog enabled and binlog_row_image=noblob.
3. DELETE from a view on a table with virtual column.
Generally the assertion happens from update_virtual_fields() call
These bugs are root-caused by missing field marking for dependant fields
of a virtual column.
Therefore a fix is: mark all the fields involved in the vcol expression by
calling field->register_field_in_read_map() instead just setting a single
bit.
3 was reproducible only on 10.4+, however the problem might has just been
invisible in the earlier versions. The fix is applicable to 10.2-10.3 as
well.
table->move_fields wasn't undone in case of error.
1. move_fields is unconditionally undone even when error is occurred
2. cherry-pick an assertion in `ptr_in_record`, which is already in 10.5
Before FRM is written walk vcol expressions through
check_table_name_processor() and check if field items match (db,
table_name) qualifier.
We cannot do this in check_vcol_func_processor() as there is already
no table name qualifiers in expressions of written and loaded FRM.
Implement a different fix for
"MDEV-19232: Floating point precision / value comparison problem"
Instead of truncating decimal values after every division,
truncate them for comparison purposes.
This reverts commit 62d73df6b2 but keeps the test.
Add a proper error handling of innobase_get_computed_value results in
row_upd_store_row/row_upd_store_v_row.
Also add an assertion in row_vers_build_clust_v_col to fail during row
purge.
Add one more assertion in row_sel_sec_rec_is_for_clust_rec for possible
future catches.
The issue occurs when the subquery_cache is enabled.
When there is a cache miss the division was leading to a value with scale 9.
In the case of cache hit the value returned was of scale 9 and due to the different
values for the scales the where condition evaluated to FALSE, hence the output
was incomplete.
To fix this problem we need to round up the decimal to the limit mentioned in
Item::decimals. This would make sure the values are compared with the same
scale.
update_virtual_field() is called as part of index rebuild in
ha_myisam::repair() (MDEV-5800) which is done on bulk INSERT finish.
Assertion in update_virtual_field() was put as part of MDEV-16222
because update_virtual_field() returns in_use->is_error(). The idea:
wrongly mixed semantics of error status before update_virtual_field()
and the status returned by update_virtual_field(). The former can
falsely influence the latter.
The code erroneously allowed both:
INSERT INTO t1 (vcol) VALUES (DEFAULT);
INSERT INTO t1 (vcol) VALUES (DEFAULT(non_virtual_column));
The former is OK, but the latter is not.
Adding a new virtual method in Item:
virtual bool vcol_assignment_allowed_value() const { return false; }
Item_null, Item_param and Item_default_value override it.
Item_default_value overrides it in the way to:
- allow DEFAULT
- disallow DEFAULT(col)
