1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-10-27 05:56:07 +03:00
Commit Graph

316 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Annamalai Gurusami
723c0a1ba5 Bug#18185930 UPD_NODE_INSERT_BLOB CAUSES BTR_EXTERN_OWNER_FLAG ASSERTION
Problem:

In the clustered index, when an update operation is done the overall
scenario (after rb#4479) is as follows:

1.  Delete mark the old record that is to be updated.
2.  The old record disowns the blobs.
3.  Insert the new record into clustered index.
4.  For non-updated blobs, new record must own it. Verified by assert.
5.  For non-updated blobs, in new record marked as inherited.

Scenario involving DB_LOCK_WAIT:

If step 3 times out, then we will skip 1 and 2 and will continue from
step 3.  This skipping is achieved by the UPD_NODE_INSERT_BLOB state.
In this case, step 4 is not correct.  Because of step 1, the new
record need not own the blobs.  Hence the assert failure.

Solution:

The assert in step 4 is removed.  Instead code is added to ensure that
the record owns the blob.  

Note:

This is a regression caused by rb#4479.

rb#4571 approved by Marko
2014-02-11 16:44:37 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
761735d9b9 Bug #14668683 ASSERT REC_GET_DELETED_FLAG(REC, PAGE_IS_COMP(PAGE))
Problem:

The function row_upd_changes_ord_field_binary() is used to decide whether to
use row_upd_clust_rec_by_insert() or row_upd_clust_rec().  The function
row_upd_changes_ord_field_binary() does not make use of charset information.
Based on binary comparison it decides that r1 and r2 differ in their ordering
fields.

In the function row_upd_clust_rec_by_insert(), an update is done by delete +
insert.  These operations internally make use of cmp_dtuple_rec_with_match()
to compare records r1 and r2.  This comparison takes place with the use of
charset information.

This means that it is possible for the deleted record to be reused in the
subsequent insert.  In the given scenario, the characters 'a' and 'A' are
considered equal in the my_charset_latin1.  When this happens, the ownership
information of externally stored blobs are not correctly handled.

Solution:

When an update is done by delete followed by insert, disown the relevant
externally stored fields during the delete marking itself (within the same
mtr).  If the insert succeeds, then nothing with respect to blob ownership
needs to be done.  If the insert fails, then the disown done earlier will be
removed when the operation is rolled back.

rb#4479 approved by Marko.
2014-01-30 12:38:13 +05:30
Mattias Jonsson
e8077731bd post-push fix for bug#17565888/bug#14621190 2013-10-28 17:08:31 +01:00
Mattias Jonsson
f4fd68857b Bug#17565888: UP TO 75% INCREASE IN DBT3 QUERY (Q7) EXECUTION TIME
Regression from bug#14621190 due to disabled optimistic restoration
of cursor, which required full key lookup instead of verifying
if previously positioned btree cursor could be reused.

Fixed by enable optimistic restore and adjust cursor afterward.

rb#3324 approved by Marko.
2013-10-18 19:25:59 +02:00
Mattias Jonsson
261268d84c Bug#14621190: HA_INNOBASE::INDEX_NEXT SKIPS A RECORD IF PREVIOUS
INDEX_READ_MAP HAD NO MATCH

If index_read_map is called for exact search and no matching records
exists it will position the cursor on the next record, but still having the
relative position to BTR_PCUR_ON.
This will make a call for index_next to read yet another next record,
instead of returning the record the cursor points to.

Fixed by setting pcur->rel_pos = BTR_PCUR_BEFORE if an exact
[prefix] search is done, but failed.

Also avoids optimistic restoration if rel_pos != BTR_PCUR_ON,
since btr_cur may be different than old_rec.

rb#3324, approved by Marko and Jimmy
2013-10-01 10:05:45 +02:00
Marko Mäkelä
780babc06a Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2013-08-16 15:49:13 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
55129f676a Bug#17312846 CHECK TABLE ASSERTION FAILURE
DICT_TABLE_GET_FORMAT(CLUST_INDEX->TABLE) >= 1

The function row_sel_sec_rec_is_for_clust_rec() was incorrectly
preparing to compare a NULL column prefix in a secondary index with a
non-NULL column in a clustered index.

This can trigger an assertion failure in 5.1 plugin and later. In the
built-in InnoDB of MySQL 5.1 and earlier, we would apparently only do
some extra work, by trimming the clustered index field for the
comparison.

The code might actually have worked properly apart from this debug
assertion failure. It is merely doing some extra work in fetching a
BLOB column, and then comparing it to NULL (which would return the
same result, no matter what the BLOB contents is).

While the test case involves CHECK TABLE, this could theoretically
occur during any read that uses a secondary index on a column prefix
of a column that can be NULL.

rb#3101 approved by Mattias Jonsson
2013-08-16 15:45:41 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
dfed175c40 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2013-08-15 15:34:12 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
5163c4a143 Bug#17302896 DOUBLE PURGE ON ROLLBACK OF UPDATING A DELETE-MARKED RECORD
There was a race condition in the rollback of TRX_UNDO_UPD_DEL_REC.

Once row_undo_mod_clust() has rolled back the changes by the rolling-back
transaction, it attempts to purge the delete-marked record, if possible, in a
separate mini-transaction.

However, row_undo_mod_remove_clust_low() fails to check if the DB_TRX_ID of
the record that it found after repositioning the cursor, is still the same.
If it is not, it means that the record was purged and another record was
inserted in its place.

So, the rollback would have performed an incorrect purge, breaking the
locking rules and causing corruption.

The problem was found by creating a table that contains a unique
secondary index and a primary key, and two threads running REPLACE
with only one value for the unique column, so that the uniqueness
constraint would be violated all the time, leading to statement
rollback.

This bug exists in all InnoDB versions (I checked MySQL 3.23.53).
It has become easier to repeat in 5.5 and 5.6 thanks to scalability
improvements and a dedicated purge thread.

rb#3085 approved by Jimmy Yang
2013-08-15 15:23:23 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
e96dc0c901 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2013-08-14 10:24:36 +03:00
Annamalai Gurusami
00bd412b5f Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-07-25 15:31:06 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
0c1ca4f0db Bug #17076737 DUPLICATE CONSTRAINTS DISPLAYED WHEN NAME INCLUDES "_IBFK_"
Problem:

When the user specified foreign key name contains "_ibfk_", InnoDB wrongly
tries to rename it. 

Solution:

When a table is renamed, all its associated foreign keys will also be renamed,
only if the foreign key names are automatically generated.  If the foreign key
names are given by the user, even if it has _ibfk_ in it, it must not be
renamed.

rb#2935 approved by Jimmy, Krunal and Satya
2013-07-25 14:53:23 +05:30
bin.x.su@oracle.com
7b66df16a1 Bug 16876388 - PLEASE BACKPORT BUG#16208542 TO 5.5
Straight forward backport.

Approved by Jimmy, rb#2656
2013-06-25 09:42:54 +08:00
Murthy Narkedimilli
cf2d852653 Fixing the bug 16919882 - WRONG FSF ADDRESS IN LICENSES HEADERS 2013-06-10 22:29:41 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
78a9e05080 Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-05-06 19:57:49 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
068e6673a0 Bug #16722314 FOREIGN KEY ID MODIFIED DURING EXPORT
Bug #16754901 PARS_INFO_FREE NOT CALLED IN DICT_CREATE_ADD_FOREIGN_TO_DICTIONARY

Problem:

There are two situations here.  The constraint name is explicitly
given by the user and the constraint name is automatically generated
by InnoDB.  In the case of generated constraint name, it is formed by
adding table name as prefix.  The table names are stored internally in
my_charset_filename.  In the case of constraint name explicitly given
by the user, it is stored in UTF8 format itself.  So, in some
situations the constraint name is in utf8 and in some situations it is
in my_charset_filename format.  Hence this problem.

Solution:

Always store the foreign key constraint name in UTF-8 even when
automatically generated.

Bug #16754901 PARS_INFO_FREE NOT CALLED IN DICT_CREATE_ADD_FOREIGN_TO_DICTIONARY

Problem:

There was a memory leak in the function dict_create_add_foreign_to_dictionary().
The allocated pars_info_t object is not freed in the error code path.

Solution:

Allocate the pars_info_t object after the error checking.

rb#2368 in review
2013-05-06 16:28:56 +05:30
Vasil Dimov
90b3eefb32 Fix Bug#16400412 UNNECESSARY DICT_UPDATE_STATISTICS DURING CONCURRENT
UPDATES

After checking that the table has changed too much in
row_update_statistics_if_needed() and calling dict_update_statistics(),
also check if the same condition holds after acquiring the table stats
latch. This is to avoid multiple threads concurrently entering and
executing the stats update code.

Approved by:	Marko (rb:2186)
2013-03-18 17:20:30 +02:00
Annamalai Gurusami
833c75da1c Bug #16133801 UNEXPLAINABLE INNODB UNIQUE INDEX LOCKS ON DELETE +
INSERT WITH SAME VALUES

Problem:

When a transaction is in READ COMMITTED isolation level, gap locks are still
taken in the secondary index, when row is inserted.  This happens when the
secondary index is scanned for duplicate.  

The function row_ins_scan_sec_index_for_duplicate() always calls the 
function row_ins_set_shared_rec_lock() with LOCK_ORDINARY irrespective of
the transaction isolation level.

Solution:

The function row_ins_scan_sec_index_for_duplicate() calls the 
function row_ins_set_shared_rec_lock() with LOCK_ORDINARY or 
LOCK_REC_NOT_GAP based on the transaction isolation level.

rb://2035 approved by Krunal and Marko
2013-03-06 11:49:57 +05:30
kevin.lewis@oracle.com
aeb9e7d814 Bug #16305265 HANG IN RENAME TABLE
This is a deadlock that will also be fixed in the server by
Bug #11844915 - HANG IN THDVAR MUTEX ACQUISITION.
So this is a simple alternate method of fixing the same problem,
but from within InnoDB.

The simple change is to make rename table start a transaction
before locking dict_sys->mutex since thd_supports_xa() can call
THDVAR which can lock a mutex, LOCK_global_system_variables, that
is used in the server by many other activities.  At least one of
those, sys_var::update(), can call back into InnoDB and try to
lock dict_sys->mutex while holding LOCK_global_system_variables.

The other bug fix for 11844915 eliminates the use of
LOCK_global_system_variables for calls to THDVAR.

Approved by marko in http://rb.no.oracle.com/rb/r/2000/
2013-02-27 12:44:58 -06:00
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
18a9945c5b Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-01-14 10:57:04 +05:30
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
e47f3943f9 - BUG#1608883: KILLING A QUERY INSIDE INNODB CAUSES IT TO EVENTUALLY CRASH
WITH AN ASSERTION

  Recently we added check to handle kill query signal for long operating
  queries. 
  While the query interruption is reported it must to ensure cursor is restore
  to proper state for HANDLER interface to work correctly. 
  Normal select query will not face this problem, as on recieving interrupt,
  select query is aborted and new select query result in re-initialization
  (including cursor).

  rb://1836. Approved by Marko.
2013-01-14 10:49:51 +05:30
Satya Bodapati
a14009a0ae Merge Post Fix for BUG#14628410 from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2013-01-04 17:34:02 +05:30
Satya Bodapati
8d5c4af8bb Merge fix for Bug#14628410 from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 2012-12-13 18:56:47 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
ffa4c37c88 Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-12-11 10:51:24 +05:30
Yasufumi Kinoshita
eb6a89b4d1 Bug#59354 : Bug #12659252 : ASSERT !OTHER_LOCK AT LOCK_REC_ADD_TO_QUEUE DURING A DELETE OPERATION
The converted implicit lock should wait for the prior conflicting lock if found.

rb://1437 approved by Marko
2012-11-28 17:07:02 +09:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
47619514f5 Bug#59354 : Bug #12659252 : ASSERT !OTHER_LOCK AT LOCK_REC_ADD_TO_QUEUE DURING A DELETE OPERATION
The converted implicit lock should wait for the prior conflicting lock if found.

rb://1437 approved by Marko
2012-11-28 17:05:23 +09:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
29db1aab1e Bug #14676249 : ROW_VERS_IMPL_X_LOCKED_LOW() MIGHT HIT !BPAGE->FILE_PAGE_WAS_FREED ASSERTION
trx_undo_prev_version_build() should confirm existence of inherited (not-own) external pages.

Bug #14676084 : ROW_UNDO_MOD_UPD_DEL_SEC() DOESN'T NEED UNDO_ROW AND UNDO_EXT INITIALIZED
 mtr script could hit the assertion error !bpage->file_page_was_freed using this path.
 So, also fixed

rb://1337 approved by Marko Makela.
2012-11-26 15:59:35 +09:00
Marko Mäkelä
49b51dd221 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-11-15 20:38:04 +02:00
Jimmy Yang
7a6479d18f Fix Bug #14753402 - FAILING ASSERTION: LEN == IFIELD->FIXED_LEN
rb://1411 approved by Marko
2012-11-14 17:00:41 +08:00
Annamalai Gurusami
a2c3ba2446 Merging from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-11-09 18:56:20 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
2c3baab8f8 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-10-18 17:14:57 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
48519303e8 Bug#14758405: ALTER TABLE: ADDING SERIAL NULL DATATYPE: ASSERTION:
LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG)

This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL
5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support
auto-increment columns.

row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of
the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values,
return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in
row_search_max_autoinc().

rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains
2012-10-18 17:03:06 +03:00
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
dcf8d0481e bug#14704286
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)

If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.

If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.

-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
2012-10-15 09:49:50 +05:30
Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com
c8cebffdbd bug#14704286
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)

If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.

If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.

-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
2012-10-15 09:24:33 +05:30
Vasil Dimov
f75957b173 Merge mysql-5.1 -> mysql-5.5 2012-10-09 16:41:13 +03:00
Annamalai Gurusami
91c8a65a80 Bug #13249921 ASSERT !BPAGE->FILE_PAGE_WAS_FREED, USUALLY IN
TRANSACTION ROLLBACK

Description:  During the rollback operation, a blob page 
is removed earlier than desired.  Consider following scenario:

1. create table t1(a int primary key,b blob) engine=innodb;
2. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000));
3. begin;
4. update t1 set b=concat(b,'b');
5. update t1 set a=a+1;
6. insert into t1 values (1,repeat('b',9000));
7. rollback;

The update operation in line 5 produces 2 undo log record. The first
undo record (TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC) goes to trx->update_undo and the
second undo record (TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC) goes to trx->insert_undo.
During rollback, they are executed out of order.

When the undo record TRX_UNDO_DEL_MARK_REC is applied/executed,
the blob ownership is also reset.  Because of this the blob page
is released earlier than desired.  This blob page must have been
freed only as part of applying/executing the undo record
TRX_UNDO_INSERT_REC.

This problem can be avoided by executing the undo records in
order.  This patch will make innodb to execute the undo records
in order.

rb://1125 approved by Marko.
2012-09-28 16:02:58 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
dcb5011700 Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-09-28 16:42:31 +05:30
Annamalai Gurusami
dde1274598 Bug #14500557 CRASH WHEN USING LONG INNODB INDEXES
The ha_innobase table handler contained two search key buffers
(srch_key_val1, srch_key_val2) of fixed size used to store the search
key.  The size of these buffers where fixed at
REC_VERSION_56_MAX_INDEX_COL_LEN + 2.  But this size is not sufficient
to hold the search key.  Hence the following assert in
row_sel_convert_mysql_key_to_innobase() failed.

2438                 /* Storing may use at most data_len bytes of buf */
2439 
2440                 if (UNIV_LIKELY(!is_null)) {
2441                         ut_a(buf + data_len <= original_buf + buf_len);
2442                         row_mysql_store_col_in_innobase_format(
2443                                 dfield, buf,
2444                                 FALSE, /* MySQL key value format col */
2445                                 key_ptr + data_offset, data_len,
2446                                 dict_table_is_comp(index->table));
2447                         buf += data_len;
2448                 }

The buffer size is now calculated with the formula
MAX_KEY_LENGTH + MAX_REF_PARTS*2.  This properly takes into account
the extra bytes needed to store the length for each column.  An index
can contain a maximum of MAX_REF_PARTS columns in it, and for each
column 2 bytes are needed to store length.  

rb://1238 approved by Marko and Vasil Dimov.
2012-09-04 14:33:56 +05:30
Marko Mäkelä
01cb705b75 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-08-21 10:59:11 +03:00
Marko Mäkelä
f491c04f37 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-08-09 10:06:59 +03:00
Inaam Rana
e183e149a4 merge from 5.1 2012-05-24 12:44:27 -04:00
Marko Mäkelä
c539dab865 Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. 2012-05-15 15:11:34 +03:00
Sunanda Menon
d37a28c9b0 Merge from mysql-5.1.63-release 2012-05-08 07:19:14 +02:00
Yasufumi Kinoshita
d90207321b Bug#11758510 (#50723): INNODB CHECK TABLE FATAL SEMAPHORE WAIT TIMEOUT POSSIBLY TOO SHORT FOR BI
Fixed not to check timeout during the check table.
2012-04-27 19:38:13 +09:00
Georgi Kodinov
e6704d116d merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-04-10 14:23:17 +03:00
Inaam Rana
160c5dddc4 Bug#13704145: ELIMINATE LRU SCAN WHEN DROPPING A TABLE
rb://942
approved by: Marko Makela

We don't need to scan LRU for dropping AHI entries when DROPing a table.
AHI entries are already removed when we free up extents for the btree.
2012-03-26 09:45:01 -04:00
Georgi Kodinov
b3099b51fa merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-03-21 14:56:29 +02:00
Joerg Bruehe
a70c8c4b20 Merge the 5.5.22 release build into main 5.5,
conflict in "sql/filesort.cc" solved manually.
2012-03-20 22:27:49 +01:00
Jimmy Yang
4320a81f92 Fix Bug #13860722 - INCOMPLETE PERFORMANCE SCHEMA INSTRUMENTATION IN INNODB 2012-03-20 17:44:51 +08:00
Georgi Kodinov
2a91c8de82 merge mysql-5.5->mysql-5.5-security 2012-03-08 17:19:54 +02:00