Print the warning(note):
YEAR(x) is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use YEAR(4) instead
on "CREATE TABLE ... YEAR(x)" or "ALTER TABLE MODIFY ... YEAR(x)", where x != 4
Problem
========
Replication breaks in the cases if the event length exceeds
the size of master Dump thread's max_allowed_packet.
The reason why this failure is occuring is because the event length is
more than the total size of the max_allowed_packet, on addition of the
max_event_header length exceeds the max_allowed_packet of the DUMP thread.
This causes the Dump thread to break replication and throw an error.
That can happen e.g with row-based replication in Update_rows event.
Fix
====
The problem is fixed in 2 steps:
1.) The Dump thread limit to read event is increased to the upper limit
i.e. Dump thread reads whatever gets logged in the binary log.
2.) On the slave side we increase the the max_allowed_packet for the
slave's threads (IO/SQL) by increasing it to 1GB.
This is done using the new server option (slave_max_allowed_packet)
included, is used to regulate the max_allowed_packet of the
slave thread (IO/SQL) by the DBA, and facilitates the sending of
large packets from the master to the slave.
This causes the large packets to be received by the slave and apply
it successfully.
Problem
========
Replication breaks in the cases if the event length exceeds
the size of master Dump thread's max_allowed_packet.
The reason why this failure is occuring is because the event length is
more than the total size of the max_allowed_packet, on addition of the
max_event_header length exceeds the max_allowed_packet of the DUMP thread.
This causes the Dump thread to break replication and throw an error.
That can happen e.g with row-based replication in Update_rows event.
Fix
====
The problem is fixed in 2 steps:
1.) The Dump thread limit to read event is increased to the upper limit
i.e. Dump thread reads whatever gets logged in the binary log.
2.) On the slave side we increase the the max_allowed_packet for the
slave's threads (IO/SQL) by increasing it to 1GB.
This is done using the new server option (slave_max_allowed_packet)
included, is used to regulate the max_allowed_packet of the
slave thread (IO/SQL) by the DBA, and facilitates the sending of
large packets from the master to the slave.
This causes the large packets to be received by the slave and apply
it successfully.
Details:
- Archive storage engine file access were not instrumented and thus
were not shown in PS tables.
Fix:
- Added instrumentation code by using PS Apis for I/O.
updating the result file. Because a multi-row insert now reserves the
auto increment values before hand, if any explicitly specified auto
increment values are there, then some of the reserved values are lost.
Problem
========
SQL statements close to the size of max_allowed_packet produce binary
log events larger than max_allowed_packet.
The reason why this failure is occuring is because the event length is
more than the total size of the max_allowed_packet + max_event_header
length. Now since the event length exceeds this size master Dump
thread is unable to send the packet on to the slave.
That can happen e.g with row-based replication in Update_rows event.
Fix
====
The problem was fixed by increasing the max_allowed_packet for the
slave's threads (IO/SQL) by increasing it to 1GB.
This is done using the new server option included which is used to
regulate the max_allowed_packet of the slave thread (IO/SQL).
This causes the large packets to be received by the slave and apply
it successfully.
BY A CONCURRENT TRANSACTIO
The member function QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::init_ror_merged_scan() performs
a table handler clone. Innodb does not provide a clone operation.
The ha_innobase::clone() is not there. The handler::clone() does not
take care of the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type. Because of
this what happens is that for one index we do a locking read, and
for the other index we were doing a non-locking (consistent) read.
The patch introduces ha_innobase::clone() member function.
It is implemented similar to ha_myisam::clone(). It calls the
base class handler::clone() and then does any additional operation
required. I am setting the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type
correctly.
rb://1060 approved by Marko
Problem - The failure on PB2 is possbily due to the port number being still in
use even after the server restarts which is not reflected in the
server restart.
Fix - The problem is fixed by starting the servers forcefully using the option
file and also the parameters for the server restart is passed correctly.
The function mysql_show_binlog_events has a local stack variable
'LOG_INFO linfo;', which is assigned to thd->current_linfo, however
this variable goes out of scope and is destroyed before clean
thd->current_linfo.
The problem is solved by moving 'LOG_INFO linfo;' to function scope.
BUG#11761686 insert_id event is not filtered.
Two issues are covered.
INSERT into autoincrement field which is not the first part in the composed primary key
is unsafe by autoincrement logging design. The case is specific to MyISAM engine
because Innodb does not allow such table definition.
However no warnings and row-format logging in the MIXED mode was done, and
that is fixed.
Int-, Rand-, User-var log-events were not filtered along with their parent
query that made possible them to screw up execution context of the following
query.
Fixed with deferring their execution until the parent query.
******
Bug#11754117
Post review fixes.
Currently SHOW MASTER LOGS and SHOW BINARY LOGS require the SUPER
privilege. Monitoring tools (such as MEM) often want to check this
output - for instance MEM generates the SUM of the sizes of the logs
reported here, and puts that in the Replication overview within the MEM
Dashboard.
However, because of the SUPER requirement, these tools often have an
account that holds open the connection whilst monitoring, and can lock
out administrators when the server gets overloaded and reaches
max_connections - there is already another SUPER privileged account
connected, the "monitor".
As SHOW MASTER STATUS, and all other replication related statements,
return with either REPLICATION CLIENT or SUPER privileges, this worklog
is to make SHOW MASTER LOGS and SHOW BINARY LOGS be consistent with this
as well, and allow both of these commands with either SUPER or
REPLICATION CLIENT.
This allows monitoring tools to not require a SUPER privilege any more,
so is safer in overloaded situations, as well as being more secure, as
lighter privileges can be given to users of such tools or scripts.
UNHANDLED, CONFUSING ERROR
The main confusion with the error message is that "it
implies that your data dictionary may now be out of
sync". This patch will remove the unwanted and the
misleading error message by not doing an unnecessary
operation in the error handling code.
rb://980 approved by: Dmitry Lenev
PROBLEM:
--------
When binary log statements are replayed on the slave, BEGIN is represented
in com_counters but COMMIT is not. Similarly in 'ROW' based replication
'INSERT','UPDATE',and 'DELETE' com_counters are not getting incremented
when the binary log statements are replayed at slave.
ANALYSIS:
---------
In 'ROW' based replication for COMMIT,INSERT,UPDATE and DELETE operations
following special events are invoked.
Xid_log_event,Write_rows_log_event,Update_rows_log_event,Update_rows_log_event.
The above mentioned events doesn't go through the parser where the
'COM_COUNTERS' are incremented.
FIX:
-----
Increment statements are added at appropriate events.
Respective functions are listed below.
'Xid_log_event::do_apply_event'
'Write_rows_log_event::do_before_row_operations'
'Update_rows_log_event::do_before_row_operations'
'Delete_rows_log_event::do_before_row_operations'
Problem - this failure occured in the test added for the fix of the
bug-13333431. The basic problem of the failure was the
value of the report_port which persisted even after the end
of the test (ie. rpl_end.inc). So this causes the assertion
in the test to fail if it is executed again.
Fix - restarted the server with the default value being passed to the
report_port after testing the two expected case so that in the
next run of the test we will not encounter the previous value of
report_port.
Description: When the table has more than one unique or primary key,
INSERT... ON DUP KEY UPDATE statement is sensitive to the order in which
the storage engines checks the keys. Depending on this order, the storage
engine may determine different rows to mysql, and hence mysql can update
different rows on master and slave.
Solution: We mark INSERT...ON DUP KEY UPDATE on a table with more than on unique
key as unsafe therefore the event will be logged in row format if it is available
(ROW/MIXED). If only STATEMENT format is available, a warning will be thrown.
Fix the calculation of the next autoinc value when offset > 1. Some of the
results have changed due to the changes in the allocation calculation. The
new calculation will result in slightly bigger gaps for bulk inserts.
rb://866 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
Backported from mysql-trunk (5.6)
The test case must insert all the records using a single transaction. Otherwise the test
case takes more than 15 minutes and will time out in pb2 and mtr.
