with on duplicate key update
There was a missed corner case in the partitioning
handler, which caused the next_insert_id to be changed
in the second level handlers (i.e the hander of a partition),
which caused this debug assertion.
The solution was to always ensure that only the partitioning
level generates auto_increment values, since if it was done
within a partition, it may fail to match the partition
function.
auto_increment on duplicate entry
The bug was that when INSERT_ID was used and the storage
engine was told to release any reserved but not used
auto_increment values, it set the highest auto_increment
value to INSERT_ID.
The fix was to check if the auto_increment value was forced
by user (INSERT_ID) or by slave-thread, i.e. not auto-
generated. So that it is only allowed to release generated
values.
Inserting a negative value in the autoincrement column of a
partitioned innodb table was causing the value of the auto
increment counter to wrap around into a very large positive
value. The consequences are the same as if a very large positive
value was inserted into a column, e.g. reduced autoincrement
range, failure to read autoincrement counter.
The current patch ensures that before calculating the next
auto increment value, the current value is within the positive
maximum allowed limit.
breaks auto increment
The auto_increment value was not initialized if
the first statement after opening a table was
an 'UPDATE'.
solution was to check initialize if it was not,
before trying to increase it in update.
Problem was a mutex added in bug n 27405 for solving a problem
with auto_increment in partitioned innodb tables.
(in ha_partition::write_row over partitions file->ha_write_row)
Solution is to use the patch for bug#33479, which refines the
usage of mutexes for auto_increment.
Backport of bug-33479 from 6.0:
Bug-33479: auto_increment failures in partitioning
Several problems with auto_increment in partitioning
(with MyISAM, InnoDB. Locking issues, not handling
multi-row INSERTs properly etc.)
Changed the auto_increment handling for partitioning:
Added a ha_data variable in table_share for storage engine specific data
such as auto_increment value handling in partitioning, also see WL 4305
and using the ha_data->mutex to lock around read + update.
The idea is this:
Store the table's reserved auto_increment value in
the TABLE_SHARE and use a mutex to, lock it for reading and updating it
and unlocking it, in one block. Only accessing all partitions
when it is not initialized.
Also allow reservations of ranges, and if no one has done a reservation
afterwards, lower the reservation to what was actually used after
the statement is done (via release_auto_increment from WL 3146).
The lock is kept from the first reservation if it is statement based
replication and a multi-row INSERT statement where the number of
candidate rows to insert is not known in advance (like INSERT SELECT,
LOAD DATA, unlike INSERT VALUES (row1), (row2),,(rowN)).
This should also lead to better concurrancy (no need to have a mutex
protection around write_row in all cases)
and work with any local storage engine.
