FAILING ASSERTION: FLEN == LEN
Problem:
Broken invariant triggered when building a unique index on a
binary column and the input data contains duplicate keys. This was broken
in debug builds only.
Fix:
Fixed length of the binary datatype can be greater than length of
the shorter prefix on which index is being created.
Problem:
In the clustered index, when an update operation is done the overall
scenario (after rb#4479) is as follows:
1. Delete mark the old record that is to be updated.
2. The old record disowns the blobs.
3. Insert the new record into clustered index.
4. For non-updated blobs, new record must own it. Verified by assert.
5. For non-updated blobs, in new record marked as inherited.
Scenario involving DB_LOCK_WAIT:
If step 3 times out, then we will skip 1 and 2 and will continue from
step 3. This skipping is achieved by the UPD_NODE_INSERT_BLOB state.
In this case, step 4 is not correct. Because of step 1, the new
record need not own the blobs. Hence the assert failure.
Solution:
The assert in step 4 is removed. Instead code is added to ensure that
the record owns the blob.
Note:
This is a regression caused by rb#4479.
rb#4571 approved by Marko
AUTO_INCREMENT_INCREMENT
Problem:
=======
When auto_increment_increment system variable decreases,
immediate next value of auto increment column is not affected.
Solution:
========
Get the previous inserted value of auto increment column by
subtracting the previous auto_increment_increment from next
auto increment value. After that calculate the current autoinc value
using newly changed auto_increment_increment variable.
Approved by Sunny [rb#4394]
Problem:
The function row_upd_changes_ord_field_binary() is used to decide whether to
use row_upd_clust_rec_by_insert() or row_upd_clust_rec(). The function
row_upd_changes_ord_field_binary() does not make use of charset information.
Based on binary comparison it decides that r1 and r2 differ in their ordering
fields.
In the function row_upd_clust_rec_by_insert(), an update is done by delete +
insert. These operations internally make use of cmp_dtuple_rec_with_match()
to compare records r1 and r2. This comparison takes place with the use of
charset information.
This means that it is possible for the deleted record to be reused in the
subsequent insert. In the given scenario, the characters 'a' and 'A' are
considered equal in the my_charset_latin1. When this happens, the ownership
information of externally stored blobs are not correctly handled.
Solution:
When an update is done by delete followed by insert, disown the relevant
externally stored fields during the delete marking itself (within the same
mtr). If the insert succeeds, then nothing with respect to blob ownership
needs to be done. If the insert fails, then the disown done earlier will be
removed when the operation is rolled back.
rb#4479 approved by Marko.
Fix :
-------
Created separate suites called innodb_zip ans i_innodb_zip that contain all compression tests.
Running the new suites with following compression-related parameters :
* innodb_compression_level = {1/9}
* innodb_log_compressed_pages = {ON/OFF}
innodb_bug12400341.test is disabled for valgrind daily test.
It might be affected by the previous test's undo slots existing,
because of slower execution.
btr_lift_page_up() writes wrong page number (different by -1) for upper than father page.
But in almost all of the cases, the father page should be root page, no upper
pages. It is very rare path.
In addition the leaf page should not be lifted unless the father page is root.
Because the branch pages should not become the leaf pages.
rb://1336 approved by Marko Makela.
btr_lift_page_up() writes wrong page number (different by -1) for upper than father page.
But in almost all of the cases, the father page should be root page, no upper
pages. It is very rare path.
In addition the leaf page should not be lifted unless the father page is root.
Because the branch pages should not become the leaf pages.
rb://1336 approved by Marko Makela.
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.
-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
for this condition. Added hook for this check.
-----
Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION
A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot. After
the transaction is started new indexes are added to the
table. Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
chooses an index. When the index scan is being initialized
via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports
the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message
stating that "insufficient history for index".
This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer. But
the my_error() api is never called. The statement level
diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error
status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).
Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
fails.
516 case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
517 default:
518 DBUG_ASSERT(0);
519 error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
520 break;
The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652
and 11746399.
14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED
rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.
Backport from mysql-5.6 the fix
(revision-id sunny.bains@oracle.com-20120315045831-20rgfa4cozxmz7kz)
Bug#13839886 - CRASH IN INNOBASE_NEXT_AUTOINC
The assertion introduce in the fix for Bug#13817703
is too strong, a negative number can be greater
than the column max value, when the column value is
a negative number.
rb://978 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
rb:1236 approved by Marko Makela
Backporting the WL#5716, "Information schema table for InnoDB
buffer pool information". Backporting revisions 2876.244.113,
2876.244.102 from mysql-trunk.
rb://1177 approved by Jimmy Yang.
BY A CONCURRENT TRANSACTIO
The member function QUICK_RANGE_SELECT::init_ror_merged_scan() performs
a table handler clone. Innodb does not provide a clone operation.
The ha_innobase::clone() is not there. The handler::clone() does not
take care of the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type. Because of
this what happens is that for one index we do a locking read, and
for the other index we were doing a non-locking (consistent) read.
The patch introduces ha_innobase::clone() member function.
It is implemented similar to ha_myisam::clone(). It calls the
base class handler::clone() and then does any additional operation
required. I am setting the ha_innobase->prebuilt->select_lock_type
correctly.
rb://1060 approved by Marko
UNHANDLED, CONFUSING ERROR
The main confusion with the error message is that "it
implies that your data dictionary may now be out of
sync". This patch will remove the unwanted and the
misleading error message by not doing an unnecessary
operation in the error handling code.
rb://980 approved by: Dmitry Lenev
Fix the calculation of the next autoinc value when offset > 1. Some of the
results have changed due to the changes in the allocation calculation. The
new calculation will result in slightly bigger gaps for bulk inserts.
rb://866 Approved by Jimmy Yang.
Backported from mysql-trunk (5.6)
The test case must insert all the records using a single transaction. Otherwise the test
case takes more than 15 minutes and will time out in pb2 and mtr.
truncating, inserting the same set of rows. When a table is
re-created with the same set of rows, the data file size must
not grow.
rb:968
Approved by Marko.
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
Backporting the fix from MySQL 5.5 to 5.1
rb:961
rb:947
There are two threads. In one thread, dml operation is going on
involving cascaded update operation. In another thread, alter
table add foreign key constraint is happening. Under these
circumstances, it is possible for the dml thread to access a
dict_foreign_t object that has been freed by the ddl thread.
The debug sync test case provides the sequence of operations.
Without fix, the test case will crash the server (because of
newly added assert). With fix, the alter table stmt will return
an error message.
rb:947
approved by Jimmy Yang
