and MDL".
Concurrent execution of a multi-DELETE statement and ALTER
TABLE statement which affected one of the tables used in
the multi-DELETE sometimes led to deadlock.
Similar deadlocks might have occured when one performed
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on a view and concurrently executed
ALTER TABLE for the view's underlying table, or when one
concurrently executed TRUNCATE TABLE for InnoDB table and
ALTER TABLE for the same table.
These deadlocks were caused by a discrepancy between types of
metadata and thr_lock.cc locks acquired by those statements.
What happened was that multi-DELETE/TRUNCATE/DML-through-the-
view statement in the first connection acquired SR lock on a
table, then ALTER TABLE would come in in the second connection
and acquire SNW metadata lock and TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
thr_lock.c lock and then would start waiting for the first
connection during lock upgrade. After that the statement in
the first connection would try to acquire TL_WRITE lock on
table and would start waiting for the second connection,
creating a deadlock.
This patch solves this problem by ensuring that we acquire
SW metadata lock in all cases in which we acquiring write
thr_lock.c lock. This guarantees that deadlocks like the
one described above won't occur since all lock conflicts
in such situation are resolved within MDL subsystem.
This patch also adds assert which should guarantee that
such situations won't arise in future.
Cherry-pick a fix Bug#37148 from next-mr, to preserve
file ids of the added files, and ensure that all the necessary
changes have been pulled.
Since initially Bug#37148 was null-merged into 6.0,
the changeset that is now being cherry-picked was likewise
null merged into next-4284.
Now that Bug#37148 has been reapplied to 6.0, try to make
it work with next-4284. This is also necessary to be able
to pull other changes from 5.1-rep into next-4284.
To resolve the merge issues use this changeset applied
to 6.0:
revid:jperkin@sun.com-20091216103628-ylhqf7s6yegui2t9
revno: 3776.1.1
committer: He Zhenxing <zhenxing.he@sun.com>
branch nick: 6.0-codebase-bugfixing
timestamp: Thu 2009-12-17 17:02:50 +0800
message:
Fix merge problem with Bug#37148
failed in open_ltable()
The problem was too restrictive asserts that enforced that
open_ltable() was called without any active HANDLERs, LOCK TABLES
or global read locks.
However, this can happen in several cases when opening system
tables. The assert would, for example, be triggered when drop
function was called from a connection with active HANDLERs as
this would cause open_ltable() to be called for mysql.proc.
The assert could also be triggered when using table-based
general log (mysql.general_log).
This patch removes the asserts since they will be triggered in
several legitimate cases and because the asserts are no longer
relevant due to changes in how locks are released.
The patch also fixes set_needs_thr_lock_abort() that before
ignored its parameter and always set the member variable to TRUE.
Test case added to mdl_sync.test.
Thanks to Dmitry Lenev for help with this bug!
There was two problems:
The first was the symptom, caused by bad error handling in
ha_partition. It did not handle print_error etc. when
having no partitions (when used by dummy handler).
The second was the real problem that when dropping tables
it reused the table type (storage engine) from when the lock
was asked for, not the table type that it had when gaining
the exclusive name lock. So that it tried to delete tables
from wrong storage engines.
Solutions for the first problem was to accept some handler
calls to the partitioning handler even if it was not setup
with any partitions, and also if possible fallback
to use the base handler's default functions.
Solution for the second problem was to remove the optimization
to reuse the definition from the cache, instead always check
the frm-file when holding the LOCK_open mutex
(updated with a fix for a debug print crash and better
comments as required by reviewer, and removed optimization
to avoid reading the frm-file).
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the
MDL subsystem.
Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and
bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and
alter table".
The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a
transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER
statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a
table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before
ALTER started.
The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level
locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after
innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout.
A transaction would start using the table and modify a few
rows.
Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows
into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on
the modified records and get blocked on a row lock.
The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get
blocked on thr_lock.c lock.
This situation of circular wait would only get resolved
by a timeout.
Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the
problem of deadlocks occurring between different
locking subsystems.
In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata
locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared
metadata lock to exclusive one.
Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for
some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively.
We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions
that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes
against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost
when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c
lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need
to abort such transactions.
The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any
mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks
in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than
innodb_lock_wait_timeout.
This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts
which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking
subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such
deadlocks inside MDL.
To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata
locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that
transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what
kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the
object.
This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable
metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all
transactions which has updated the table to go away.
This solves the second issue.
Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired
by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the
first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of
DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary.
Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by
this patch:
- From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those
statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock)
wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to
complete.
- From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE
(i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait
for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table
to complete.
As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies
to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE.
- DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort
statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or
renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete.
- Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock,
not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table
and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm
that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES
WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for
MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL
subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may
lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement
transactions even if these only use MyISAM:
session 1: session 2:
begin;
update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write;
-- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1
update t2 ...
(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK)
- Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE
was abandoned.
LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same
priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE.
SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in
the wait queue.
- We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly
locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses
table t1, and issues:
LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE;
FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'),
an error is produced.
In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES,
the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
The auto-inc unsafe warning makes sense even though it's just
one auto-inc table could be involved via a trigger or a stored
function.
However its content was not updated by bug@45677 fixes continuing to mention
two tables whereas the fixes refined semantics of replication of auto_increment
in stored routine.
Fixed with updating the error message, renaming the error and an internal unsafe-condition
constants.
A documentation notice
======================
Inserting into an autoincrement column in a stored function or a trigger
is unsafe for replication.
Even with just one autoincrement column, if the routine is invoked more than
once slave is not guaranteed to execute the statement graph same way as
the master.
And since it's impossible to estimate how many times a routine can be invoked at
the query pre-execution phase (see lock_tables), the statement is marked
pessimistically unsafe.
The problem was that a failure to open a view wasn't being
properly handled. When opening a view with unknown definer,
the open procedure would be treated as successful and would
later crash when attempting to lock the view (which wasn't
opened to begin with).
The solution is to skip further processing when opening a
table if it fails with a fatal error.
condition variable per context instead of one mutex and one conditional
variable for the whole subsystem.
This should increase concurrency in this subsystem.
It also opens the way for further changes which are necessary to solve
such bugs as bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock"
and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter
table".
Two other notable changes done by this patch:
- MDL subsystem no longer implicitly acquires global intention exclusive
metadata lock when per-object metadata lock is acquired. Now this has
to be done by explicit calls outside of MDL subsystem.
- Instead of using separate MDL_context for opening system tables/tables
for purposes of I_S we now create MDL savepoint in the main context
before opening tables and rollback to this savepoint after closing
them. This means that it is now possible to get ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error
even not inside a transaction. This might happen in unlikely case when
one runs DDL on one of system tables while also running DDL on some
other tables. Cases when this ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error is not justified
will be addressed by advanced deadlock detector for MDL subsystem which
we plan to implement.
Diagnostics_area::set_ok_status at PREPARE
The problem occured during processing of stored routines.
Routines are loaded from mysql.proc, parsed and put into the sp cache by
sp_cache_routine(). The assert occured because the return value from
sp_cache_routine() was not checked for top level CALLs. This meant that any
errors during sp_cache_routine() went unoticed and triggered the assert when
my_ok() was later called.
This is a regression introduced by the patch for Bug#30977, only visible in
source trees with MDL and using debug builds of the server.
This patch fixes the problem by checking the return value from sp_cache_routine()
for top level CALLs and propagating any errors similar to what is done for other
calls to sp_cache_routine().
No test case added.
Conflicts:
Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_loaddata.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog2.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_mix_innodb_myisam.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_unsafe.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_insert_id.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_auto_increment_bug33029.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_udf.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_slow_query_log.test
Text conflict in sql/field.h
Text conflict in sql/log.cc
Text conflict in sql/log_event.cc
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/mysql_priv.h
Text conflict in sql/share/errmsg.txt
Text conflict in sql/sp.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_acl.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_base.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_class.h
Text conflict in sql/sql_db.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_delete.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_insert.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
Text conflict in sql/sql_load.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_table.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_update.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_view.cc
Conflict adding files to storage/innobase. Created directory.
Conflict because storage/innobase is not versioned, but has versioned children. Versioned directory.
Conflict adding file storage/innobase. Moved existing file to storage/innobase.moved.
Conflict adding files to storage/innobase/handler. Created directory.
Conflict because storage/innobase/handler is not versioned, but has versioned children. Versioned directory.
Contents conflict in storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc
This change is supposed to reduce number of ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
errors which occur when multi-statement transaction encounters
conflicting metadata lock in cases when waiting is possible.
The idea is not to fail ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error immediately when
we encounter conflicting metadata lock. Instead we release all
metadata locks acquired by current statement and start to wait
until conflicting lock go away. To avoid deadlocks we use simple
empiric which aborts waiting with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error if it
turns out that somebody is waiting for metadata locks owned by
this transaction.
This patch also fixes bug #46273 "MySQL 5.4.4 new MDL: Bug#989
is not fully fixed in case of ALTER".
The bug was that concurrent execution of UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE
statement as a part of multi-statement transaction that already
has used table being updated and ALTER TABLE statement might have
resulted of loss of isolation between this transaction and ALTER
TABLE statement, which manifested itself as changes performed by
ALTER TABLE becoming visible in transaction and wrong binary log
order as a consequence.
This problem occurred when UPDATE or MULTI-UPDATE's wait in
mysql_lock_tables() call was aborted due to metadata lock
upgrade performed by concurrent ALTER TABLE. After such abort all
metadata locks held by transaction were released but transaction
silently continued to be executed as if nothing has happened.
We solve this problem by changing our code not to release all
locks in such case. Instead we release only locks which were
acquired by current statement and then try to reacquire them
by restarting open/lock tables process. We piggyback on simple
deadlock detector implementation since this change has to be
done anyway for it.
3655 Jon Olav Hauglid 2009-10-19
Bug #30977 Concurrent statement using stored function and DROP FUNCTION
breaks SBR
Bug #48246 assert in close_thread_table
Implement a fix for:
Bug #41804 purge stored procedure cache causes mysterious hang for many
minutes
Bug #49972 Crash in prepared statements
The problem was that concurrent execution of DML statements that
use stored functions and DDL statements that drop/modify the same
function might result in incorrect binary log in statement (and
mixed) mode and therefore break replication.
This patch fixes the problem by introducing metadata locking for
stored procedures and functions. This is similar to what is done
in Bug#25144 for views. Procedures and functions now are
locked using metadata locks until the transaction is either
committed or rolled back. This prevents other statements from
modifying the procedure/function while it is being executed. This
provides commit ordering - guaranteeing serializability across
multiple transactions and thus fixes the reported binlog problem.
Note that we do not take locks for top-level CALLs. This means
that procedures called directly are not protected from changes by
simultaneous DDL operations so they are executed at the state they
had at the time of the CALL. By not taking locks for top-level
CALLs, we still allow transactions to be started inside
procedures.
This patch also changes stored procedure cache invalidation.
Upon a change of cache version, we no longer invalidate the entire
cache, but only those routines which we use, only when a statement
is executed that uses them.
This patch also changes the logic of prepared statement validation.
A stored procedure used by a prepared statement is now validated
only once a metadata lock has been acquired. A version mismatch
causes a flush of the obsolete routine from the cache and
statement reprepare.
Incompatible changes:
1) ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK is reported for a transaction trying to access
a procedure/function that is locked by a DDL operation in
another connection.
2) Procedure/function DDL operations are now prohibited in LOCK
TABLES mode as exclusive locks must be taken all at once and
LOCK TABLES provides no way to specifiy procedures/functions to
be locked.
Test cases have been added to sp-lock.test and rpl_sp.test.
Work on this bug has very much been a team effort and this patch
includes and is based on contributions from Davi Arnaut, Dmitry
Lenev, Magne Mæhre and Konstantin Osipov.
"HANDLER statements within a transaction might lead to deadlocks".
Introduce a notion of a sentinel to MDL_context. A sentinel
is a ticket that separates all tickets in the context into two
groups: before and after it. Currently we can have (and need) only
one designated sentinel -- it separates all locks taken by LOCK
TABLE or HANDLER statement, which must survive COMMIT and ROLLBACK
and all other locks, which must be released at COMMIT or ROLLBACK.
The tricky part is maintaining the sentinel up to date when
someone release its corresponding ticket. This can happen, e.g.
if someone issues DROP TABLE under LOCK TABLES (generally,
see all calls to release_all_locks_for_name()).
MDL_context::release_ticket() is modified to take care of it.
******
A fix and a test case for Bug#46224 "HANDLER statements within a
transaction might lead to deadlocks".
An attempt to mix HANDLER SQL statements, which are transaction-
agnostic, an open multi-statement transaction,
and DDL against the involved tables (in a concurrent connection)
could lead to a deadlock. The deadlock would occur when
HANDLER OPEN or HANDLER READ would have to wait on a conflicting
metadata lock. If the connection that issued HANDLER statement
also had other metadata locks (say, acquired in scope of a
transaction), a classical deadlock situation of mutual wait
could occur.
Incompatible change: entering LOCK TABLES mode automatically
closes all open HANDLERs in the current connection.
Incompatible change: previously an attempt to wait on a lock
in a connection that has an open HANDLER statement could wait
indefinitely/deadlock. After this patch, an error ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK
is produced.
The idea of the fix is to merge thd->handler_mdl_context
with the main mdl_context of the connection, used for transactional
locks. This makes deadlock detection possible, since all waits
with locks are "visible" and available to analysis in a single
MDL context of the connection.
Since HANDLER locks and transactional locks have a different life
cycle -- HANDLERs are explicitly open and closed, and so
are HANDLER locks, explicitly acquired and released, whereas
transactional locks "accumulate" till the end of a transaction
and are released only with COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT,
a concept of "sentinel" was introduced to MDL_context.
All locks, HANDLER and others, reside in the same linked list.
However, a selected element of the list separates locks with
different life cycle. HANDLER locks always reside at the
end of the list, after the sentinel. Transactional locks are
prepended to the beginning of the list, before the sentinel.
Thus, ROLLBACK, COMMIT or ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT, only
release those locks that reside before the sentinel. HANDLER locks
must be released explicitly as part of HANDLER CLOSE statement,
or an implicit close.
The same approach with sentinel
is also employed for LOCK TABLES locks. Since HANDLER and LOCK TABLES
statement has never worked together, the implementation is
made simple and only maintains one sentinel, which is used either
for HANDLER locks, or for LOCK TABLES locks.
Bug#16565 mysqld --help --verbose does not order variablesBug#20413 sql_slave_skip_counter is not shown in show variables
Bug#20415 Output of mysqld --help --verbose is incomplete
Bug#25430 variable not found in SELECT @@global.ft_max_word_len;
Bug#32902 plugin variables don't know their names
Bug#34599 MySQLD Option and Variable Reference need to be consistent in formatting!
Bug#34829 No default value for variable and setting default does not raise error
Bug#34834 ? Is accepted as a valid sql mode
Bug#34878 Few variables have default value according to documentation but error occurs
Bug#34883 ft_boolean_syntax cant be assigned from user variable to global var.
Bug#37187 `INFORMATION_SCHEMA`.`GLOBAL_VARIABLES`: inconsistent status
Bug#40988 log_output_basic.test succeeded though syntactically false.
Bug#41010 enum-style command-line options are not honoured (maria.maria-recover fails)
Bug#42103 Setting key_buffer_size to a negative value may lead to very large allocations
Bug#44691 Some plugins configured as MYSQL_PLUGIN_MANDATORY in can be disabled
Bug#44797 plugins w/o command-line options have no disabling option in --help
Bug#46314 string system variables don't support expressions
Bug#46470 sys_vars.max_binlog_cache_size_basic_32 is broken
Bug#46586 When using the plugin interface the type "set" for options caused a crash.
Bug#47212 Crash in DBUG_PRINT in mysqltest.cc when trying to print octal number
Bug#48758 mysqltest crashes on sys_vars.collation_server_basic in gcov builds
Bug#49417 some complaints about mysqld --help --verbose output
Bug#49540 DEFAULT value of binlog_format isn't the default value
Bug#49640 ambiguous option '--skip-skip-myisam' (double skip prefix)
Bug#49644 init_connect and \0
Bug#49645 init_slave and multi-byte characters
Bug#49646 mysql --show-warnings crashes when server dies
The reason for the deadlock was an improper exit from
MDL_context::wait_for_locks() which caused mysys_var->current_mutex to remain
LOCK_mdl even though LOCK_mdl was no longer held by that connection.
This could for example lead to a deadlock in the following way:
1) INSERT DELAYED tries to open a table but fails, and trying to recover it
calls wait_for_locks().
2) Due to a pending exclusive request, wait_for_locks() fails and exits without
resetting mysys_var->current_mutex for the delayed insert handler thread. So it
continues to point to LOCK_mdl.
3) The handler thread manages to open a table.
4) A different connection takes LOCK_open and tries to take LOCK_mdl.
5) FLUSH TABLES from a third connection notices that the handler thread has a
table open, and tries to kill it. This involves locking mysys_var->current_mutex
while having LOCK_open locked. Since current_mutex mistakenly points to LOCK_mdl,
we have a deadlock.
This patch makes sure MDL_EXIT_COND() is called before exiting wait_for_locks().
This clears mysys->current_mutex which resolves the issue.
An assert is added to recover_from_failed_open_table_attempt() after
wait_for_locks() is called, to check that current_mutex is indeed reset.
With this assert in place, existing tests in (e.g.) mdl_sync.test will fail
without this patch.
-----------------------------------------------------------
2630.28.28 Magne Mahre 2008-12-05
Bug #38661 'all threads hang in "opening tables" or "waiting for table"
and cpu is at 100%'
Concurrent execution of FLUSH TABLES statement and at least two statements
using the same table might have led to live-lock which caused all three
connections to stall and hog 100% of CPU.
tdc_wait_for_old_versions() wrongly assumed that there cannot be a share
with an old version and no used TABLE instances and thus was failing to
perform wait in situation when such old share was cached in MDL subsystem
thanks to a still active metadata lock on the table. So it might have
happened that two or more connections simultaneously executing statements
which involve table being flushed managed to prevent each other from
waiting in this function by keeping shared metadata lock on the table
constantly active (i.e. one of the statements managed to take/hold this
lock while other statements were calling tdc_wait_for_old_versions()).
Thus they were forcing each other to loop infinitely in open_tables() -
close_thread_tables_for_reopen() - tdc_wait_for_old_versions() cycle
causing CPU hogging.
This patch fixes this problem by removing this false assumption from
tdc_wait_for_old_versions().
Note that the problem is specific only for server versions >= 6.0.
No test case is submitted for this test, as the test infrastructure
hasn't got the necessary primitives to test the behaviour. The
manifestation is that throughput will decrease to a low level
(possibly 0) after some time, and stay at that level. Several
transactions will not complete.
Manual testing can be done by running the code submitted by Shane
Bester attached to the bug report. If the bug persists, the
transaction thruput will almost immediately drop to near zero
(shown as the transaction count output from the test program staying
on a close to constant value, instead of increasing rapidly).
(diagnostics_area)
Execution of CREATE TABLE ... SELECT statement was not atomic in
the sense that concurrent statements trying to affect its target
table might have sneaked in between the moment when the table was
created and moment when it was filled according to SELECT clause.
This resulted in inconsistent binary log, unexpected target table
contents. In cases when concurrent statement was a DDL statement
CREATE TABLE ... SELECT might have failed with ER_CANT_LOCK error.
In more detail:
Due to premature metadata lock downgrade which occured after CREATE
TABLE SELECT statement created table but before it managed to obtain
table-level lock on it other statements were allowed to open, lock
and change target table in the middle of CREATE TABLE SELECT
execution. This also meant that it was possible that CREATE TABLE
SELECT would wait in mysql_lock_tables() when it was called for newly
created table and that this wait could have been aborted by concurrent
DDL. The latter led to execution of unexpected branch of code and
CREATE TABLE SELECT ending with ER_CANT_LOCK error.
The premature downgrade occured because open_table(), which was called
for newly created table, decided that it is OK to downgrade metadata
lock from exclusive to shared since table exists, even although it
was not acquired within this call.
This fix ensures that open_table() does not downgrade metadata lock
if it is not acquired during its current invocation.
Testing:
The bug is exposed in a race condition, and is thus difficult to
expose in a standard mysql-test-run test case. Instead, a stress
test using the Random Query Generator (https://launchpad.net/randgen)
will trip the problem occasionally.
% perl runall.pl \
--basedir=<build dir> \
--mysqld=--table-lock-wait-timeout=5 \
--mysqld=--skip-safemalloc \
--grammar=conf/maria_bulk_insert.yy \
--reporters=ErrorLog,Backtrace,WinPackage \
--mysqld=--log-output=file \
--queries=100000 \
--threads=10 \
--engine=myisam
Note: You will need a debug build to expose the bug
When the bug is tripped, the server will abort and dump core.
Backport from 6.0-codebase (revid: 2617.53.4)
Bug #46654 False deadlock on concurrent DML/DDL with partitions,
inconsistent behavior
The problem was that if one connection is running a multi-statement
transaction which involves a single partitioned table, and another
connection attempts to alter the table, the first connection gets
ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK and cannot proceed anymore, even when the ALTER TABLE
statement in another connection has timed out or failed.
The reason for this was that the prepare phase for ALTER TABLE for
partitioned tables removed all instances of the table from the table
definition cache before it started waiting on the lock. The transaction
running in the first connection would notice this and report ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK.
This patch changes the prep_alter_part_table() ALTER TABLE code so that
tdc_remove_table() is no longer called. Instead, only the TABLE instance
changed by prep_alter_part_table() is marked as needing reopen.
The patch also removes an unnecessary call to tdc_remove_table() from
mysql_unpack_partition() as the changed TABLE object is destroyed by the
caller at a later point.
Test case added in partition_sync.test.
Bug#42546 Backup: RESTORE fails, thinking it finds an existing table
The problem occured when a MDL locking conflict happened for a non-existent
table between a CREATE and a INSERT statement. The code for CREATE
interpreted this lock conflict to mean that the table existed,
which meant that the statement failed when it should not have.
The problem could occur for CREATE TABLE, CREATE TABLE LIKE and
ALTER TABLE RENAME.
This patch fixes the problem for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
It is based on code backported from the mysql-6.1-fk tree written
by Dmitry Lenev. CREATE now uses normal open_and_lock_tables() code
to acquire exclusive locks. This means that for the test case in the bug
description, CREATE will wait until INSERT completes so that it can
get the exclusive lock. This resolves the reported bug.
The patch also prohibits CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE under
LOCK TABLES. Note that this is an incompatible change and must
be reflected in the documentation. Affected test cases have been
updated.
mdl_sync.test contains tests for CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE LIKE.
Fixing the issue for ALTER TABLE RENAME is beyond the scope of this
patch. ALTER TABLE cannot be prohibited from working under LOCK TABLES
as this could seriously impact customers and a proper fix would require
a significant rewrite.
