The problem was that some functions (namely IN() starting with 4.1, and
CHAR() starting with 5.0) were returning NULL in certain conditions,
while they didn't set their maybe_null flag. Because of that there could
be some problems with 'IS NULL' check, and statements that depend on the
function value domain, like CREATE TABLE t1 SELECT 1 IN (2, NULL);.
The fix is to set maybe_null correctly.
- Added 'SET NAMES <charset>" upon ::open
- Added test and results for simple UTF test
federated.test:
BUG #17044 Federated Storage Engine not UTF8 clean
New test. Using hex - pasting various charsets in the terminal doesn't work.
federated.result:
BUG# 17044 Federated Storage Engine not UTF8 clean
New test results
ha_federated.cc:
BUG# 17044 Federated Storage Engine not UTF8 clean
Upon ::open, set names to table's charset
Problem: When we have a really large number (between 2^63 and 2^64)
as the left side of the mod operator, it gets improperly corerced
into a signed value.
Solution: Added check to see if the "negative" number is really
positive, and if so, cast it.
Bug#21025 (misleading error message when creating functions named 'x', or 'y')
Bug#22619 (Spaces considered harmful)
This change contains a fix to report warnings or errors, and multiple tests
cases.
Before this fix, name collisions between:
- Native functions
- User Defined Functions
- Stored Functions
were not systematically reported, leading to confusing behavior.
I) Native / User Defined Function
Before this fix, is was possible to create a UDF named "foo", with the same
name as a native function "foo", but it was impossible to invoke the UDF,
since the syntax "foo()" always refer to the native function.
After this fix, creating a UDF fails with an error if there is a name
collision with a native function.
II) Native / Stored Function
Before this fix, is was possible to create a SF named "db.foo", with the same
name as a native function "foo", but this was confusing since the syntax
"foo()" would refer to the native function. To refer to the Stored Function,
the user had to use the "db.foo()" syntax.
After this fix, creating a Stored Function reports a warning if there is a
name collision with a native function.
III) User Defined Function / Stored Function
Before this fix, creating a User Defined Function "foo" and a Stored Function
"db.foo" are mutually exclusive operations. Whenever the second function is
created, an error is reported. However, the test suite did not cover this
behavior.
After this fix, the behavior is unchanged, and is now covered by test cases.
Note that the code change in this patch depends on the fix for Bug 21114.
calling (rather than defining) non-deterministic SP in SBR (as opposed
to RBR or mixed) will throw an error now.
require mixed mode for tests now. SBR will now fail when calling
non-deter SPs and SFs (as it should), and RBR already failed by virtue of
giving different results for "show binlog" than the results-file has.
also test for 16456 now. lastly make amends because one of the tests
fails with a new error # now as code was added to sql_trigger.cc while
test was disabled.
The problem was that THD::row_count_func was zeroed too. It was zeroed
as a fix for bug 4905 "Stored procedure doesn't clear for "Rows affected"
However, the proper solution is not to zero, because THD::row_count_func has
been set to -1 already in mysql_execute_command(), a later fix, which obsoletes
the incorrect fix of #4095
The regression is caused by the fix for bug 14767. When INSERT ... SELECT
used a view in the SELECT list that was not inlined, and there was an
active transaction, the server could crash in Query_cache::invalidate.
On INSERT ... SELECT only the table being inserted into is invalidated.
Thus views that can't be inlined are skipped from invalidation.
The bug manifests itself in two ways so there is 2 test cases.
One checks that the only the table being inserted into is invalidated.
And the second one checks that there is no crash on INSERT ... SELECT.
