"What do you mean, there's a bug? There isn't even code!"
There was some token code for plug-in variables of the SET type,
but clearly this never worked, or was subject to massive bit rot
since. Bug-fixes ... fail-safes ... tests -- fais au mieux, mon chou!
Problem 1:
column_priv_hash uses utf8_general_ci collation
for the key comparison. The key consists of user name,
db name and table name. Thus user with privileges on table t1
is able to perform the same operation on T1
(the similar situation with user name & db name, see acl_cache).
So collation which is used for column_priv_hash and acl_cache
should be case sensitive.
The fix:
replace system_charset_info with my_charset_utf8_bin for
column_priv_hash and acl_cache
Problem 2:
The same situation with proc_priv_hash, func_priv_hash,
the only difference is that Routine name is case insensitive.
So the fix is to use my_charset_utf8_bin for
proc_priv_hash & func_priv_hash and convert routine name into lower
case before writing the element into the hash and
before looking up the key.
Additional fix: mysql.procs_priv Routine_name field collation
is changed to utf8_general_ci.
It's necessary for REVOKE command
(to find a field by routine hash element values).
Note:
It's safe for lower-case-table-names mode too because
db name & table name are converted into lower case
(see GRANT_NAME::GRANT_NAME).
This assertion would occur if UPDATE was used to update multiple
tables containing an AUTO_INCREMENT column and if the inserted
row had a user-supplied value for that column. The assertion
could then be triggered by the next statement.
The problem was only noticeable on debug builds of the server.
The cause of the problem was that the code for multi update did
not properly reset the TABLE->auto_increment_if_null flag after update.
The flag is used to indicate that a non-null value of an auto_increment field
has been provided by the user or retrieved from a current record.
Open_tables() contains an assertion that tests this flag, and this
was triggered in this case by ALTER TABLE.
This patch fixes the problem by resetting the auto_increment_if_null
field to FALSE once a row has been updated.
This bug is similar to Bug#47274, but for multi update rather
than INSERT DELAYED.
Test case added to update.test.
Problem: involving a spatial index for "non-spatial" queries
(that don't containt MBRXXX() functions) may lead to failed assert.
Fix: don't use spatial indexes in such cases.
Original revision:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2801.10.16
committer: Vladislav Vaintroub <vvaintroub@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-azalea-bugfixing
timestamp: Mon 2009-08-10 13:26:23 +0200
message:
Bug #46267 Shutdown with idle connection crash the server.
The crash happens when mysqld logs a warning. The macro
ER() used in sql_print_warning references thread local storage
variable via current_thd(), to output the warning in "current
user language". However, for the shutdown thread,
current_thd() will return NULL, and mysqld will crash while
derefencing NULL pointer.
Solution: get error mesage text with ER_DEFAULT() macro
instead of ER(), this does not current_thd() and will output
errors in default language.
------------------------------------------------------------
Conflicts
=========
Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in libmysqld/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in libmysqld/Makefile.am
Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.experimental
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_tmp_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_create_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_circular_simplex.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_sp006.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in sql/Makefile.am
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_rli.cc
Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_binlog.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
21 conflicts encountered.
NOTE
====
mysql-5.1-rpl-merge has been made a mirror of mysql-next-mr:
- "mysql-5.1-rpl-merge$ bzr pull ../mysql-next-mr"
This is the first cset (merge/...) committed after pulling
from mysql-next-mr.
to 5.1 partially. This patch brings what was left to mysql-next-mr.
Original revisions in 6.0:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.31.26
committer: Alexander Nozdrin <alik@sun.com>
branch nick: 6.0-rt-bug43138.3
timestamp: Thu 2009-04-30 19:31:30 +0400
message:
Fix for Bug#43138: DROP DATABASE failure does not clean up message list.
The problem was that the high-level function mysql_rm_db() invoked
low-level mysql_rm_table_part2(), which reported low-level error
(Unknown table) if SE refused to delete a table. Also when
mysql_rm_table_part2() reported an error, it didn't add corresponding
warning into the list (because it is used from other places where such
behaviour is required).
The fix is to
1. Remove no_warnings_for_error usage from sql_table.cc
2. Improve internal error handler support in THD, so that
a stack of error handlers is allowed.
3. Create an internal error handler (Drop_table_error_handler)
to silence useless warnings.
4. Use the handler in DROP DATABASE and DROP TABLE statements.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.69.38
committer: Alexander Nozdrin <alik@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-next-bugfixing-bug37431
timestamp: Mon 2009-08-24 21:52:09 +0400
message:
A test case for Bug#37431 (DROP TABLE does not report errors correctly).
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.31.29
committer: Dmitry Lenev <dlenev@mysql.com>
branch nick: mysql-6.0-runtime
timestamp: Fri 2009-05-01 17:37:34 +0400
message:
Follow-up for fix for bug "Bug#43138: DROP DATABASE failure
does not clean up message list".
Fixed drop.test failure under non-debug server by moving part
of test dependent on debug-only feature to separate .test file,
which won't be run for non-debug versions of server.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.45.17
committer: Sergei Golubchik <serg@mysql.com>
branch nick: 6.0-maria
timestamp: Wed 2009-05-13 20:08:58 +0200
message:
followup for bug#43138
if delete fails with a permission denied error, we want to show it
------------------------------------------------------------
The patch was backported to 5.1 in scope of Bug#42364 by
the following revision:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2497.975.3
committer: Sergey Glukhov <Sergey.Glukhov@sun.com>
branch nick: mysql-5.1-bugteam
timestamp: Fri 2009-07-03 13:22:06 +0500
message:
Bug#42364 SHOW ERRORS returns empty resultset after dropping non existent table
enabled message storing into error message list
for 'drop table' command
------------------------------------------------------------
allows SHOW CREATE TABLE) from 6.0. Original revisions:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.31.8
committer: Alexander Nozdrin <alik@sun.com>
branch nick: 6.0-rt-bug38347
timestamp: Thu 2009-03-26 09:08:24 +0300
message:
Patch for Bug#38347: ALTER ROUTINE privilege allows SHOW CREATE TABLE.
If a user has any of the following privileges for a table (or the database
if the table), he should be able to issue SHOW CREATE TABLE for the table:
- CREATE
- DROP
- ALTER
- DELETE
- INDEX
- INSERT
- SELECT
- UPDATE
- TRIGGER
- REFERENCES
- GRANT OPTION
- CREATE VIEW
- SHOW VIEW
Any other privilege (even SUPER) should not allow SHOW CREATE TABLE.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2617.31.11
committer: Alexander Nozdrin <alik@sun.com>
branch nick: 6.0-rt
timestamp: Fri 2009-03-27 21:36:34 +0300
message:
Additional patch for Bug#38347 (ALTER ROUTINE privilege
allows SHOW CREATE TABLE).
The problem was that information_schema.test,
information_schema_parameters.test and information_schema_routines.test
failed with the first patch. That happened due to limitation in check_access():
it allows only SELECT_ACL privilege for INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables.
The patch is to request only SELECT_ACL privilege for INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables.
------------------------------------------------------------
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
Backporting BUG#38173 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The reason of the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
2630.39.1, 2630.28.29, 2630.34.3, 2630.34.2, 2630.34.1, 2630.29.29,
2630.29.28, 2630.31.1, 2630.28.13, 2630.28.10, 2617.23.14 and
some other minor revisions.
This patch implements:
WL#4264 "Backup: Stabilize Service Interface" -- all the
server prerequisites except si_objects.{h,cc} themselves (they can
be just copied over, when needed).
WL#4435: Support OUT-parameters in prepared statements.
(and all issues in the initial patches for these two
tasks, that were discovered in pushbuild and during testing).
Bug#39519: mysql_stmt_close() should flush all data
associated with the statement.
After execution of a prepared statement, send OUT parameters of the invoked
stored procedure, if any, to the client.
When using the binary protocol, send the parameters in an additional result
set over the wire. When using the text protocol, assign out parameters to
the user variables from the CALL(@var1, @var2, ...) specification.
The following refactoring has been made:
- Protocol::send_fields() was renamed to Protocol::send_result_set_metadata();
- A new Protocol::send_result_set_row() was introduced to incapsulate
common functionality for sending row data.
- Signature of Protocol::prepare_for_send() was changed: this operation
does not need a list of items, the number of items is fully sufficient.
The following backward incompatible changes have been made:
- CLIENT_MULTI_RESULTS is now enabled by default in the client;
- CLIENT_PS_MULTI_RESUTLS is now enabled by default in the client.
