RESULTING MY_WC_T RESULT IS NOT USED
Issue : handler functions my_ismbchar_utf8,
my_well_formed_len_mb for charset utf8
is calling unicode converion function
to validate and to find the character
length. Because of this, instructions
which will convert the utf8 to unicode
are executed for no use.
A similar issue exist with charset utf8mb4
Solution : reorganized the code such that character
validation part of unicode conversion
handler is extracted(duplicated) in to
separate function. Hence
my_ismbchar_utf8, my_well_formed_len_mb
will call the new function which only
validates and return the length of mb(utf8).
A similar fix for charset utf8mb4.
strings/ctype-utf8.c:
New functions has been added for charset utf8 and utf8mb4
to validate and to get the length of the character.
- Character set code & tests from Alexander Barkov
- Integration with ALTER TABLE, REPAIR and open_table from Monty
The problem was that MySQL 5.6 added some croatian and vitanamese character set collations that are incompatible with MariaDB.
The fix is to move the MariaDB conflicting collation numbers out of the region that MySQL is likely to use.
mysql_upgrade, REPAIR TABLE or ALTER TABLE will fix the collations.
If one tries to access and old incompatible table, one will get the error "Table upgrade required...."
After this patch, MariaDB supports all the MySQL character set collations and the old MariaDB croatian collations, which are closer to the latest standard than the MySQL versions.
New character sets:
ucs2_croatian_mysql561_uca_ci
utf8_croatian_mysql561_uca_ci
utf16_croatian_mysql561_uca_ci
utf32_croatian_mysql561_uca_ci
utf8mb4_croatian_mysql561_uca_ci
Other things:
- Fixed some compiler warnings
- mysql_upgrade prints information about repaired tables.
- Increased version number
VERSION:
Increased VERSION number
client/mysqlcheck.c:
Print repaired table name when using --verbose
include/m_ctype.h:
Add new MariaDB collation regions that are not likely to conflict with MySQL
include/my_base.h:
Added flag to detect if table was opened for ALTER TABLE
mysql-test/r/ctype_ldml.result:
Updated result
mysql-test/r/ctype_uca.result:
Updated result
mysql-test/r/ctype_upgrade.result:
Updated result
mysql-test/r/ctype_utf16_uca.result:
Updated result
mysql-test/r/ctype_utf32_uca.result:
Updated result
mysql-test/r/ctype_utf8mb4_uca.result:
Updated result
mysql-test/std_data/ctype_upgrade:
Test files for testing upgrading of conflicting collations
mysql-test/suite/engines/funcs/r/db_alter_collate_ascii.result:
New collations added
mysql-test/suite/engines/funcs/r/db_alter_collate_utf8.result:
New collations added
mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_ctype_ldml.result:
Updated test result
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_ctype_ldml.test:
Updated test result
mysql-test/suite/plugins/r/show_all_plugins.result:
Updated version number
mysql-test/suite/roles/create_and_drop_role_invalid_user_table.result:
Updated version number
mysql-test/t/ctype_ldml.test:
Updated test
mysql-test/t/ctype_uca.test:
Testing of new collations
mysql-test/t/ctype_upgrade.test:
Testing of upgrading tables with old collations
The test ensures that:
- We will get an error if we try to open a table with old collations.
- CHECK TABLE will detect that the table needs to be upgraded.
- ALTER TABLE and REPAIR will fix the table.
- mysql_upgrade works as expected
mysql-test/t/ctype_utf16_uca.test:
Testing of new collations
mysql-test/t/ctype_utf32_uca.test:
Testing of new collations
mysql-test/t/ctype_utf8mb4_uca.test:
Testing of new collations
mysys/charset-def.c:
Added new character sets
mysys/charset.c:
Always give an error, if requested, if a character set didn't exist
sql/handler.cc:
- Added upgrade_collation() to check if collation is compatible with old version
- check_collation_compatibility() checks if we are using an old collation from MariaDB 5.5 or MySQL 5.6
- ha_check_for_upgrade() returns HA_ADMIN_NEEDS_ALTER if we have an incompatible collation
sql/handler.h:
Added new prototypes
sql/sql_table.cc:
- Mark that tables are opened for ALTER TABLE
- If table needs to be upgraded, ensure we are not using online alter table.
sql/table.cc:
- If we are using an old incompatible collation, change to use the new one and mark table as incompatible.
- Give an error if we try to open an incompatible table.
sql/table.h:
Added error that table needs to be rebuild
storage/connect/ha_connect.cc:
Fixed compiler warning
strings/ctype-uca.c:
New character sets
Problem:-
We have created a table with UTF8_BIN collation.
In case, when in our query we have ORDER BY clause over a function
call we are getting result in incorrect order.
Note:the bug is not there in 5.5.
Analysis:
In 5.5, for UTF16_BIN, we have min and max multi-byte length is 2 and 4
respectively.In make_sortkey(),for 2 byte character character we are
assuming that the resultant length will be 2 byte/character. But when we
use my_strnxfrm_unicode_full_bin(), we store sorting weights using 3 bytes
per character.This result in truncated result.
Same thing happen for UTF8MB4, where we have 1 byte min multi-byte and
4 byte max multi-byte.We will accsume resultant data as 1 byte/character,
which result in truncated result.
Solution:-
use strnxfrm(means use of MY_CS_STRNXFRM macro) is used for sort, in
which the resultant length is not dependent on source length.
which makes it possible to add more world language collations
with very complex collation rules (e.g. Myanmar):
- Weight string for a single character in a user defined collation
was erroneously limited to 7 weights (instead of 8 weights).
Added an extra element in the user-defined weight arrays,
to fit 8 non-zero weights.
- Weight string limit for contractions was made two times longer (16 weights),
which allows longer contractions without affecting the performance
of filesort.
- A user-defined collation now refuses to initialize and reports an error
in case if a weight string gets longer than 8 weights for a single character,
or longer than 16 weights for a contraction. Previously weight strings
for such characters (and contractions) were cut, so a collation
could silently start with wrong rules.
- Fixed a bug in handling rules like "&a << b" in combination with
shift-after-method="expand". The primary weight for "b" was not
correctly calculated, which erroneously made "b" primary greater than "a"
instead of primary equal to "a".
Workaround for a possible GCC bug happening in my_fill_ucs2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58039
Commenting out the optimized loop.
Using the original MySQL version.
modified:
strings/ctype-ucs2.c
Problem:
=======
It was detected an incorrect behavior of my_strtoll10 function when
converting strings with numbers in the following format:
"184467440XXXXXXXXXYY"
Where XXXXXXXXX > 737095516 and YY <= 15
Samples of problematic numbers:
"18446744073709551915"
"18446744073709552001"
Instead of returning the larger unsigned long long value and setting overflow
in the returned error code, my_strtoll10 function returns the lower 64-bits
of the evaluated number and did not set overflow in the returned error code.
Analysis:
========
Once trying to fix bug 16820156, I've found this bug in the overflow check of
my_strtoll10 function.
This function, once receiving a string with an integer number larger than
18446744073709551615 (the larger unsigned long long number) should return the
larger unsigned long long number and set overflow in the returned error code.
Because of a wrong overflow evaluation, the function didn't catch the
overflow cases where (i == cutoff) && (j > cutoff2) && (k <= cutoff3). When
the overflow evaluation fails, the function return the lower 64-bits of the
evaluated number and do not set overflow in the returned error code.
Fix:
===
Corrected the overflow evaluation in my_strtoll10.
includes:
* remove some remnants of "Bug#14521864: MYSQL 5.1 TO 5.5 BUGS PARTITIONING"
* introduce LOCK_share, now LOCK_ha_data is strictly for engines
* rea_create_table() always creates .par file (even in "frm-only" mode)
* fix a 5.6 bug, temp file leak on dummy ALTER TABLE
WITH UTF8_UNICODE_CI COLLATION
Problem Description:
When comparing datetime values with strings, the utf8_unicode_ci collation
prevents correct comparisons. Consider the below set of queries, it is not
showing any results on a table which has tuples that satisfies the query.
But for collation utf8_general_ci it shows one tuple.
set names utf8 collate utf8_unicode_ci;;
select * from lang where dt='1979-12-09';
Analysis:
The comparison function is not chosen in case of collation utf8_unicode_ci.
In agg_item_set_converter() because the collation state is having
"MY_CS_NONASCII" for collation type "utf8_unicode_ci". The conversion
of the collation is happening for the date field. And because of that
it is unable to pickup proper compare function(i.e CMP_DATE_WITH_STR).
Actually the bug is accidentally introduced by the WL#3759 in 5.5.
And in 5.6 it is been fixed by the WL#3664.
Fix:
I have backported the changes from the file strings/ctype-uca.c which
are related to "utf8" introduced by the WL#3664.
This change helps in choosing the correct comparison function for all
the collations of utf8 charset.
Fixed OPTIMIZE with innodb
include/my_sys.h:
Removed ATTRIBUTE_FORMAT() as it gave warnings for %'s
sql/log_event.cc:
Optimization:
use my_b_write() and my_b_write_byte() instead of my_b_printf()
use strmake() instead of my_snprintf()
sql/sql_admin.cc:
Fixed bug in admin_recreate_table()
Fixed OPTIMIZE with innodb
sql/sql_table.cc:
Indentation fixes
strings/my_vsnprintf.c:
Changed fprintf() to fputs()
Bug#12608543: CRASHES WITH DECIMALS AND STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE REPREPARED ERRORS
Backporting these two fixes to 5.1
Added unittest to test my_decimal construtor and assignment operators
sql/my_decimal.h:
Added constructor and assignment operators for my_decimal
unittest/my_decimal/my_decimal-t.cc:
Added test to check constructor and assignment operators for my_decimal
Mini-benchmarking demonstrates up to 10% improvement in latin1->utf8
conversion.
modified:
@ strings/ctype-latin1.c
redundant test in ctype-latin1.c removed
@ strings/ctype-utf8.c
my_uni_utf8 rewritten in a more efficient way
Due to an internal change in the server code in between 5.1 and 5.5
(wl#2649) the hash function used in KEY partitioning changed
for numeric and date/time columns (from binary hash calculation
to character based hash calculation).
Also enum/set changed from latin1 ci based hash calculation to
binary hash between 5.1 and 5.5. (bug#11759782).
These changes makes KEY [sub]partitioned tables on any of
the affected column types incompatible with 5.5 and above,
since the calculation of partition id differs.
Also since InnoDB asserts that a deleted row was previously
read (positioned), the server asserts on delete of a row that
is in the wrong partition.
The solution for this situation is:
1) The partitioning engine will check that delete/update will go to the
partition the row was read from and give an error otherwise, consisting
of the rows partitioning fields. This will avoid asserts in InnoDB and
also alert the user that there is a misplaced row. A detailed error
message will be given, including an entry to the error log consisting
of both table name, partition and row content (PK if exists, otherwise
all partitioning columns).
2) A new optional syntax for KEY () partitioning in 5.5 is allowed:
[SUB]PARTITION BY KEY [ALGORITHM = N] (list_of_cols)
Where N = 1 uses the same hashing as 5.1 (Numeric/date/time fields uses
binary hashing, ENUM/SET uses charset hashing) N = 2 uses the same
hashing as 5.5 (Numeric/date/time fields uses charset hashing,
ENUM/SET uses binary hashing). If not set on CREATE/ALTER it will
default to 2.
This new syntax should probably be ignored by NDB.
3) Since there is a demand for avoiding scanning through the full
table, during upgrade the ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY ... command is
considered a no-op (only .frm change) if everything except ALGORITHM
is the same and ALGORITHM was not set before, which allows manually
upgrading such table by something like:
ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 () or
ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 2 ()
4) Enhanced partitioning with CHECK/REPAIR to also check for/repair
misplaced rows. (Also works for ALTER TABLE t CHECK/REPAIR PARTITION)
CHECK FOR UPGRADE:
If the .frm version is < 5.5.3
and uses KEY [sub]partitioning
and an affected column type
then it will fail with an message:
KEY () partitioning changed, please run:
ALTER TABLE `test`.`t1` PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 (a)
PARTITIONS 12
(i.e. current partitioning clause, with the addition of
ALGORITHM = 1)
CHECK without FOR UPGRADE:
if MEDIUM (default) or EXTENDED options are given:
Scan all rows and verify that it is in the correct partition.
Fail for the first misplaced row.
REPAIR:
if default or EXTENDED (i.e. not QUICK/USE_FRM):
Scan all rows and every misplaced row is moved into its correct
partitions.
5) Updated mysqlcheck (called by mysql_upgrade) to handle the
new output from CHECK FOR UPGRADE, to run the ALTER statement
instead of running REPAIR.
This will allow mysql_upgrade (or CHECK TABLE t FOR UPGRADE) to upgrade
a KEY [sub]partitioned table that has any affected field type
and a .frm version < 5.5.3 to ALGORITHM = 1 without rebuild.
Also notice that if the .frm has a version of >= 5.5.3 and ALGORITHM
is not set, it is not possible to know if it consists of rows from
5.1 or 5.5! In these cases I suggest that the user does:
(optional)
LOCK TABLE t WRITE;
SHOW CREATE TABLE t;
(verify that it has no ALGORITHM = N, and to be safe, I would suggest
backing up the .frm file, to be used if one need to change to another
ALGORITHM = N, without needing to rebuild/repair)
ALTER TABLE t <old partitioning clause, but with ALGORITHM = N>;
which should set the ALGORITHM to N (if the table has rows from
5.1 I would suggest N = 1, otherwise N = 2)
CHECK TABLE t;
(here one could use the backed up .frm instead and change to a new N
and run CHECK again and see if it passes)
and if there are misplaced rows:
REPAIR TABLE t;
(optional)
UNLOCK TABLES;
