Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:15:25 -0000
3272 Roy Lyseng 2010-11-01
Bug#52068: Optimizer generates invalid semijoin materialization plan
When MaterializeScan semijoin strategy was used and there were one
or more outer dependent tables before the semijoin tables, the scan
over the materialized table was not properly reset for each row of
the prefix outer tables.
Example: suppose we have a join order:
ot1 SJ-Mat-Scan(it2 it3) ot4
Notice that this is called a MaterializeScan, even though there is an
outer table ahead of the materialized tables. Usually a MaterializeScan
has the outer tables after the materialized table, but this is
a special (but legal) case with outer dependent tables both before and
after the materialized table.
For each qualifying row from ot1, a new scan over the materialized
table must be set up. The code failed to do that, so all scans after
the first one returned zero rows from the materialized table.
If the ::single_value_transformer() find an existing HAVING condition it used
to do the transformation:
1) HAVING cond -> (HAVING Cond) AND (cond_guard (Item_ref_null_helper(...))
As the AND condition in 1) is Mc'Carty evaluated, the
right side of the AND cond should be executed only if the
original 'HAVING evaluated' to true.
However, as we failed to set 'top_level' for the tranformed HAVING condition,
'abort_on_null' was FALSE after transformation. An
UNKNOWN having condition will then not terminate evaluation of the
transformed having condition, and we incorrectly continued
into the Item_ref_null_helper() part.
When the optimizer creates items out of other items it does
not have to call the fix_fields method. Usually in these
cases it calls quick_fix_field() that just marks the
created item as fixed. If the created item is an Item_func
object then calling quick_fix_field() works fine if the
arguments of the created functional item are already fixed.
Otherwise some unfixed nodes remain in the item tree and
it triggers an assertion failure whenever the item is
evaluated.
Fixed the problem by making the method quick_fix_field
virtual and providing an implementation for the class
Item_func objects that recursively calls the method
for unfixed arguments of any functional item.
- Fixed problem with oqgraph and 'make dist'
Note that after this merge we have a problem show in join_outer where we examine too many rows in one specific case (related to BUG#57024).
This will be fixed when mwl#128 is merged into 5.3.
Registration of pointer change if we assign it to other pointer which should be identical after statement execution (PS/SP).
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
Test suite.
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
Test suite.
sql/sql_class.cc:
The procedure of the pointer registration.
sql/sql_class.h:
The procedure of the pointer registration.
sql/sql_lex.cc:
Registration of pointer change if we assign it to other pointer which should be identical after statement execution (PS/SP).
This bug was introduced in this revision:
kostja@sun.com-20100727102553-b4n2ojcyfj79l2x7
("A pre-requisite patch for the fix for Bug#52044.")
It happens because close_thread_tables() is now called in
open_and_lock_tables upon failure. Hence, table is no longer
open when optimizer tries to do cleanup.
Fix: Make sure to do cleanup in st_select_lex_unit::prepare()
upon failure. This way, cleanup() is called before tables are
released.
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
Added test case for Bug#57704.
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
Added test case for Bug#57704.
sql/sql_union.cc:
st_select_lex_unit::prepare(): On failure, make sure cleanup()
is called.
union...order by (select... where...)
The problem is mysql is trying to materialize and
cache the scalar sub-queries at JOIN::optimize
even for EXPLAIN where the number of columns is
totally different from what's expected.
Fixed by not executing the scalar subqueries
for EXPLAIN.
on index
'my_decimal' class has two members which can be used to access the
value. The member variable buf (inherited from parent class decimal_t)
is set to member variable buffer so that both are pointing to same value.
Item_copy_decimal::copy() uses memcpy to clone 'my_decimal'. The member
buffer is declared as an array and memcpy results in copying the values
of the array, but the inherited member buf, which should be pointing at
the begining of the array 'buffer' starts pointing to the begining of
buffer in original object (which is being cloned). Further updates on
'my_decimal' updates only the inherited member 'buf' but leaves
buffer unchanged.
Later when the new object (which now holds a inconsistent value) is cloned
again using proper cloning function 'my_decimal2decimal' the buf pointer
is fixed resulting in loss of the current value.
Using my_decimal2decimal instead of memcpy in Item_copy_decimal::copy()
fixed this problem.
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
Updated result file after addding test case for bug#47904.
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
Added test case for bug#47904.
sql/item.cc:
Memcopy shouldn't be used to clone my_decimal. Use my_decimal2decimal
instead.
This patch does three things:
- It adds the possibility to force the execution of top-level [NOT] IN
subquery predicates via the IN=>EXISTS transformation. This is done by
setting both optimizer switches partial_match_rowid_merge and
partial_match_table_scan to "off".
- It adjusts all test cases where the complete optimizer_switch is
selected because now we have two more switches.
- For those test cases where the plan changes because of the new available
strategies, we switch off both partial match strategies in order to
force the "old" IN=>EXISTS strategy. This is done because most of these
test cases specifically test bugs in this strategy.
sql/opt_subselect.cc:
Adds the possibility to force the execution of top-level [NOT] IN
subquery predicates via the IN=>EXISTS transformation. This is done by
setting both optimizer switches partial_match_rowid_merge and
partial_match_table_scan to "off".
subselect_single_select_engine::exec()
When a subquery doesn't need to be evaluated because
it returns only aggregate functions and these aggregates
can be calculated from the metadata about the table it
was not updating all the relevant members of the JOIN
structure to reflect that this is a constant query.
This caused problems to the enclosing subquery
('<> SOME' in the test case above) trying to read some
data about the tables.
Fixed by setting const_tables to the number of tables
when the SELECT is optimized away.
error in the query.
Fixes a leak after materializing a GROUP BY subquery to a
temp table when the subquery has a blob column in the SELECT
list.
Fixed by correctly destructing temporary buffers after doing
the conversion.
error in the query.
Fixes a leak after materializing a GROUP BY subquery to a
temp table when the subquery has a blob column in the SELECT
list.
Fixed by correctly destructing temporary buffers for re-usable
queries
int join_read_key(JOIN_TAB*)
The eq_ref access method TABLE_REF (accessed through
JOIN_TAB) to save state and to track if this is the
first row it finds or not.
This state was not reset on subquery re-execution
causing an assert.
Fixed by resetting the state before the subquery
re-execution.
int join_read_key(JOIN_TAB*)
The eq_ref access method TABLE_REF (accessed through
JOIN_TAB) to save state and to track if this is the
first row it finds or not.
This state was not reset on subquery re-execution
causing an assert.
Fixed by resetting the state before the subquery
re-execution.
- Moved some code from innodb_plugin to xtradb, to ensure that all tests runs
- Did changes in pbxt and maria storage engines becasue of changes in thd->query
- Reverted wrong code in sql_table.cc for how ROW_FORMAT is used.
This is a re-commit of Monty's merge to eliminate an extra commit from
MySQL-5.1.42 that was accidentally included in the merge.
This is a merge of the MySQL 5.1.41 clone-off (clone-5.1.41-build). In
case there are any extra changes done before final MySQL 5.1.41
release, these will need to be merged later before MariaDB 5.1.41
release.
mysql-next-mr-bugfixing.
Bug no 32858 was fixed in two different ways in what was
then called mysql 5.1 and 6.0. The fix in 6.0 was very
different since bugfix no 33204 was present. Furthermore,
the two fixes were not compatible. Hence in order to
backport Bug#33204 to the 5.1-based mysql-next-mr-bugfixing,
it was necessary to remove the 5.1 fix of 32858 and apply
the 6.0 version of the fix.
mysql-test/r/subselect.result:
Bug#33204-backport: Test result
mysql-test/r/union.result:
Bug#33204-backport:
- Reversal of test result: bugfix no 32858 for 5.1
- Application of test result: bugfix no 32858 for 6.0
mysql-test/t/subselect.test:
Bug#33204-backport:
- Changed tests
- Test case
mysql-test/t/union.test:
Bug#33204-backport:
- Reversal of test: bugfix no 32858 for 5.1
- Application of test: bugfix no 32858 for 6.0
sql/sql_class.cc:
Bug#33204-backport: Reversal of bugfix no 32858 for 5.1
sql/sql_class.h:
Bug#33204-backport: Reversal of bugfix no 32858 for 5.1
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
Bug#33204-backport:
- Reversal of bugfix no 32858 for 5.1
- Application of bugfix no 32858 for 6.0
- Application of bugfix no 33204
having clause...
The fix for bug 46184 was not very complete. It was not covering
views using temporary tables and multiple tables in a FROM clause.
Fixed by reverting the fix for 46184 and making a more general
check that is checking at the right execution stage and for all
of the non-supported cases.
Now PROCEDURE ANALYZE on non-top level SELECT is also forbidden.
Updated the analyse.test and subselect.test accordingly.
* Finished Monty and Jani's merge
* Some InnoDB tests still fail (because it's old xtradb code run against
newer testsuite). They are expected to go after mergning with the latest
xtradb.
field references
This error requires a combination of factors :
1. An "impossible where" in the outermost SELECT
2. An aggregate in the outermost SELECT
3. A correlated subquery with a WHERE clause that includes an outer
field reference as a top level WHERE sargable predicate
When JOIN::optimize detects an "impossible WHERE" it will bail out
without doing the rest of the work and initializations. It will not
call make_join_statistics() as well. And make_join_statistics fills
in various structures for each table referenced.
When processing the result of the "impossible WHERE" the query must
send a single row of data if there are aggregate functions in it.
In this case the server marks all the aggregates as having received
no rows and calls the relevant Item::val_xxx() method on the SELECT
list. However if this SELECT list happens to contain a correlated
subquery this subquery is evaluated in a normal evaluation mode.
And if this correlated subquery has a reference to a field from the
outermost "impossible where" SELECT the add_key_fields will mistakenly
consider the outer field reference as a "local" field reference when
looking for sargable predicates.
But since the SELECT where the outer field reference refers to is not
completely initialized due to the "impossible WHERE" in this level
we'll get a NULL pointer reference.
Fixed by making a better condition for discovering if a field is "local"
to the SELECT level being processed.
It's not enough to look for OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT in this case since
for outer references to constant tables the Item_field::used_tables()
will return 0 regardless of whether the field reference is from the
local SELECT or not.
