fix: don't call field->val_decimal() if the field->is_null()
because the buffer at field->ptr might not hold a valid decimal value
sql/item_sum.cc:
do not call field->val_decimal() if the field->is_null()
storage/maria/ma_blockrec.c:
cleanup
storage/maria/ma_rrnd.c:
cleanup
strings/decimal.c:
typo
If triggers are used for an insert/update/delete statement than the values of
all virtual columns must be computed as any of them may be used by the triggers.
MDEV-567: Wrong result from a query with correlated subquery if ICP is allowed:
backport the fix developed for SHOW EXPLAIN:
revision-id: psergey@askmonty.org-20120719115219-212cxmm6qvf0wlrb
branch nick: 5.5-show-explain-r21
timestamp: Thu 2012-07-19 15:52:19 +0400
BUG#992942 & MDEV-325: Pre-liminary commit for testing
and adjust it so that it handles DS-MRR scans correctly.
Use post_kill_notification in for one_thread_per_connection scheduler,
the same as already used in threadpool, to reliably wake a thread stuck in
read() or in different poll() variations.
If, when executing a query with ORDER BY col LIMIT n, the optimizer chose
an index-merge scan to access the table containing col while there existed
an index defined over col then optimizer did not consider the possibility
of using an alternative range scan by this index to avoid filesort. This
could cause a performance degradation if the optimizer flag index_merge was
set up to 'on'.
mysql-test/r/partition.result:
Added test case
mysql-test/t/partition.test:
Added test case
sql/ha_partition.cc:
Removed printing of not initialized variable
storage/maria/ha_maria.cc:
Don't copy variables that are not initialized
This task fixes an ineffeciency that is a remainder from MySQL 5.0/5.1. There, subqueries
were optimized in a lazy manner, when executed for the first time. During this lazy optimization
it may happen that the server finds a more efficient subquery engine, and substitute the current
engine of the query being executed with the new engine. This required re-execution of the engine.
MariaDB 5.3 pre-optimizes subqueries in almost all cases, and the engine is chosen in most cases,
except when subquery materialization found that it must use partial matching. In this case, the
current code was performing one extra re-execution although it was not needed at all. The patch
performs the re-execution only if the engine was changed while executing.
In addition the patch performs small cleanup by removing "enum store_key_result" because it is
essentially a boolean, and the code that uses it already maps it to a boolean.
Fix by Sergey Petrunia.
This patch only prevents the evaluation of expensive subqueries during optimization.
The crash reported in this bug has been fixed by some other patch.
The fix is to call value->is_null() only when !value->is_expensive(), because is_null()
may trigger evaluation of the Item, which in turn triggers subquery evaluation if the
Item is a subquery.
.. into MariaDB 5.3
Fix for Bug#12667154 SAME QUERY EXEC AS WHERE SUBQ GIVES DIFFERENT
RESULTS ON IN() & NOT IN() COMP #3
This bug causes a wrong result in mysql-trunk when ICP is used
and bad performance in mysql-5.5 and mysql-trunk.
Using the query from bug report to explain what happens and causes
the wrong result from the query when ICP is enabled:
1. The t3 table contains four records. The outer query will read
these and for each of these it will execute the subquery.
2. Before the first execution of the subquery it will be optimized. In
this case the important is what happens to the first table t1:
-make_join_select() will call the range optimizer which decides
that t1 should be accessed using a range scan on the k1 index
It creates a QUICK_RANGE_SELECT object for this.
-As the last part of optimization the ICP code pushes the
condition down to the storage engine for table t1 on the k1 index.
This produces the following information in the explain for this table:
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t1 range k1 k1 5 NULL 3 Using index condition; Using filesort
Note the use of filesort.
3. The first execution of the subquery does (among other things) due
to the need for sorting:
a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys():
b. find_all_keys() will read the required keys for all qualifying
rows from the storage engine. To do this it checks if it has a
quick-select for the table. It will use the quick-select for
reading records. In this case it will read four records from the
storage engine (based on the range criteria). The storage engine
will evaluate the pushed index condition for each record.
c. At the end of create_sort_index() there is code that cleans up a
lot of stuff on the join tab. One of the things that is cleaned
is the select object. The result of this is that the
quick-select object created in make_join_select is deleted.
4. The second execution of the subquery does the same as the first but
the result is different:
a. Call create_sort_index() which again will call find_all_keys()
(same as for the first execution)
b. find_all_keys() will read the keys from the storage engine. To
do this it checks if it has a quick-select for the table. Now
there is NO quick-select object(!) (since it was deleted in
step 3c). So find_all_keys defaults to read the table using a
table scan instead. So instead of reading the four relevant records
in the range it reads the entire table (6 records). It then
evaluates the table's condition (and here it goes wrong). Since
the entire condition has been pushed down to the storage engine
using ICP all 6 records qualify. (Note that the storage engine
will not evaluate the pushed index condition in this case since
it was pushed for the k1 index and now we do a table scan
without any index being used).
The result is that here we return six qualifying key values
instead of four due to not evaluating the table's condition.
c. As above.
5. The two last execution of the subquery will also produce wrong results
for the same reason.
Summary: The problem occurs due to all but the first executions of the
subquery is done as a table scan without evaluating the table's
condition (which is pushed to the storage engine on a different
index). This is caused by the create_sort_index() function deleting
the quick-select object that should have been used for executing the
subquery as a range scan.
Note that this bug in addition to causing wrong results also can
result in bad performance due to executing the subquery using a table
scan instead of a range scan. This is an issue in MySQL 5.5.
The fix for this problem is to avoid that the Quick-select-object that
the optimizer created is deleted when create_sort_index() is doing
clean-up of the join-tab. This will ensure that the quick-select
object and the corresponding pushed index condition will be available
and used by all following executions of the subquery.
Check ability of index to be NULL as it made in MyISAM. UNIQUE with NULL could have several NULL entries so we have to continue even if ve have found a row.
