row_build_index_entry(): In innodb_file_format=Barracuda
(ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC or ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED), a secondary index on a
full column can refer to a field that is stored off-page in the
clustered index record. Take that into account.
rb:692 approved by Jimmy Yang
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
Attempt to update an InnoDB temporary table under LOCK TABLES
led to assertion failure in both debug and production builds
if this temporary table was explicitly locked for READ. The
same scenario works fine for MyISAM temporary tables.
The assertion failure was caused by discrepancy between lock
that was requested on the rows of temporary table at LOCK TABLES
time and by update operation. Since SQL-layer requested a
read-lock at LOCK TABLES time InnoDB engine assumed that upcoming
statements which are going to be executed under LOCK TABLES will
only read table and therefore should acquire only S-lock.
An update operation broken this assumption by requesting X-lock.
Possible approaches to fixing this problem are:
1) Skip locking of temporary tables as locking doesn't make any
sense for connection-local objects.
2) Prohibit changing of temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES ...
READ.
Unfortunately both of these approaches have drawbacks which make
them unviable for stable versions of server.
So this patch takes another approach and changes code in such way
that LOCK TABLES for a temporary table will always request write
lock. In 5.1 version of this patch switch from read lock to write
lock is done inside of InnoDBs handler methods as doing it on
SQL-layer causes compatibility troubles with FLUSH TABLES WITH
READ LOCK.
mysql-test/suite/innodb/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/r/innodb_mysql.result:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
mysql-test/suite/innodb_plugin/t/innodb_mysql.test:
Added test for bug #11762012 - "54553: INNODB ASSERTS IN
HA_INNOBASE::UPDATE_ROW, TEMPORARY TABLE, TABLE LOCK".
storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should
be always requested for such tables.
storage/innodb_plugin/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
Assume that a temporary table locked by LOCK TABLES can be updated
even if it was only locked for read and therefore an X-lock should
be always requested for such tables.
Problem: MYSQL_BIN_LOG::reset_logs acquires mutexes in wrong order.
The correct order is first LOCK_thread_count and then LOCK_log. This function
does it the other way around. This leads to deadlock when run in parallel
with a thread that takes the two locks in correct order. For example, a thread
that disconnects will take the locks in the correct order.
Fix: change order of the locks in MYSQL_BIN_LOG::reset_logs:
first LOCK_thread_count and then LOCK_log.
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_reset_master.result:
added result file
mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_reset_master.test:
Added test case that demonstrates deadlock because of wrong mutex order.
The deadlock is between two threads:
- RESET MASTER acquires mutexes in wrong order.
- client thread shutdown code acquires mutexes in right order.
Actually, this test case does not produce deadlock in 5.1, probably
the client thread shutdown code does not hold both mutexes at the same
time. However, the bug existed in 5.1 (mutexes are taken in the wrong
order) so we push the test case to 5.1 too, to prevent future
regressions.
sql/log.cc:
Change mutex acquisition to the correct order:
first LOCK_thread_count, then LOCK_log.
sql/mysqld.cc:
Add debug code to synchronize test case.
VM-WIN2003-32-A, SLES10-IA64-A
The test case waits for master_pos_wait not to timeout, which
means that the deadlock between SQL and IO threads was
succesfully and automatically dealt with.
However, very rarely, master_pos_wait reports a timeout. This
happens because the time set for master_pos_wait to wait was
too small (6 seconds). On slow test env this could be a
problem.
We fix this by setting the timeout inline with the one used
in sync_slave_with_master (300 seconds). In addition we
refactored the test case and refined some comments.
causes future shutdown hang
InnoDB would hang on shutdown if any XA transactions exist in the
system in the PREPARED state. This has been masked by the fact that
MySQL would roll back any PREPARED transaction on shutdown, in the
spirit of Bug #12161 Xa recovery and client disconnection.
[mysql-test-run] do_shutdown_server: Interpret --shutdown_server 0 as
a request to kill the server immediately without initiating a
shutdown procedure.
xid_cache_insert(): Initialize XID_STATE::rm_error in order to avoid a
bogus error message on XA ROLLBACK of a recovered PREPARED transaction.
innobase_commit_by_xid(), innobase_rollback_by_xid(): Free the InnoDB
transaction object after rolling back a PREPARED transaction.
trx_get_trx_by_xid(): Only consider transactions whose
trx->is_prepared flag is set. The MySQL layer seems to prevent
attempts to roll back connected transactions that are in the PREPARED
state from another connection, but it is better to play it safe. The
is_prepared flag was introduced in the InnoDB Plugin.
trx_n_prepared: A new counter, counting the number of InnoDB
transactions in the PREPARED state.
logs_empty_and_mark_files_at_shutdown(): On shutdown, allow
trx_n_prepared transactions to exist in the system.
trx_undo_free_prepared(), trx_free_prepared(): New functions, to free
the memory objects of PREPARED transactions on shutdown. This is not
needed in the built-in InnoDB, because it would collect all allocated
memory on shutdown. The InnoDB Plugin needs this because of
innodb_use_sys_malloc.
trx_sys_close(): Invoke trx_free_prepared() on all remaining
transactions.
Bug#59410 read uncommitted: unlock row could not find a 3 mode lock
on the record
This bug is present only in 5.6 but I am adding the test case to earlier
versions to ensure it never appears in earlier versions too.
Bug#59410 read uncommitted: unlock row could not find a 3 mode lock
on the record
This bug is present only in 5.6 but I am adding the test case to earlier
versions to ensure it never appears in earlier versions too.
ARE NOT BEING HONORED
max_allowed_packet works in conjunction with net_buffer_length.
max_allowed_packet is an upper bound of net_buffer_length.
So it doesn't make sense to set the upper limit lower than the value.
Added a warning (using ER_UNKNOWN_ERRROR and a specific message)
when this is done (in the log at startup and when setting either
max_allowed_packet or the net_buffer_length variables)
Added a test case.
Fixed several tests that broke the above rule.
The slave was not able to find the correct row in the innodb
table, because the row fetched from the innodb table would not
match the before image. This happened because the (don't care)
bytes in the NULLed fields would change once the row was stored
in the storage engine (from zero to the default value). This
would make bulk memory comparison (using memcmp) to fail.
We fix this by taking a preventing measure and avoiding memcmp
for tables that contain nullable fields. Therefore, we protect
the slave search routine from engines that return arbitrary
values for don't care bytes (in the nulled fields). Instead, the
slave thread will only check null_bits and those fields that are
not set to NULL when comparing the before image against the
storage engine row.
mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_record_compare.test:
Added test case to the include file so that this is tested
with more than one engine.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_rec_comp_innodb.result:
Result update.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_rec_comp_myisam.result:
Result update.
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_rec_comp_myisam.test:
Moved the include file last, so that the result from
BUG#11766865 is not intermixed with the result for
BUG#11760454.
sql/log_event.cc:
Skips memory comparison if the table has nullable
columns and compares only non-nulled fields in the
field comparison loop.
There is a race between two threads: user thread and the dump
thread. The former sets a debug instruction that makes the latter wait
before processing an Xid event. There can be cases that the dump
thread has not yet processed the previous Xid event, causing it to
wait one Xid event too soon, thus causing sync_slave_with_master never
to resume.
We fix this by moving the instructions that set the debug variable
after calling sync_slave_with_master.
rw_lock_create_func(): Initialize lock->writer_thread, so that Valgrind
will not complain even when Valgrind instrumentation is not enabled.
Flag lock->writer_thread uninitialized, so that Valgrind can complain
when it is used uninitialized.
rw_lock_set_writer_id_and_recursion_flag(): Revert the bogus Valgrind
instrumentation that was pushed in the first attempt to fix this bug.
privileges".
The first problem was that DROP USER didn't properly remove privileges
on stored functions from in-memory structures. So the dropped user
could have called stored functions on which he had privileges before
being dropped while his connection was still around.
Even worse if a new user with the same name was created he would
inherit privileges on stored functions from the dropped user.
Similar thing happened with old user name and function privileges
during RENAME USER.
This problem stemmed from the fact that the handle_grant_data() function
which handled DROP/RENAME USER didn't take any measures to update
in-memory hash with information about function privileges after
updating them on disk.
This patch solves this problem by adding code doing just that.
The second problem was that RENAME USER didn't properly update in-memory
structures describing table-level privileges and privileges on stored
procedures. As result such privileges could have been lost after a rename
(i.e. not associated with the new name of user) and inherited by a new
user with the same name as the old name of the original user.
This problem was caused by code handling RENAME USER in
handle_grant_struct() which [sic!]:
a) tried to update wrong (tables) hash when updating stored procedure
privileges for new user name.
b) passed wrong arguments to function performing the hash update and
didn't take into account the way in which such update could have
changed the order of the hash elements.
This patch solves this problem by ensuring that a) the correct hash
is updated, b) correct arguments are used for the hash_update()
function and c) we take into account possible changes in the order
of hash elements.
mysql-test/r/grant.result:
Added test coverage for bug#36544 "DROP USER does not remove stored
function privileges".
mysql-test/suite/funcs_1/r/innodb_storedproc_06.result:
Since after fixing bug#36544 "DROP USER does not remove stored function
privileges" in-memory structures are correctly updated by DROP USER,
DROP FUNCTION performed after DROP USER for its definer no longer
produces unwarranted warning/error messages.
mysql-test/suite/funcs_1/r/memory_storedproc_06.result:
Since after fixing bug#36544 "DROP USER does not remove stored function
privileges" in-memory structures are correctly updated by DROP USER,
DROP FUNCTION performed after DROP USER for its definer no longer
produces unwarranted warning/error messages.
mysql-test/suite/funcs_1/r/myisam_storedproc_06.result:
Since after fixing bug#36544 "DROP USER does not remove stored function
privileges" in-memory structures are correctly updated by DROP USER,
DROP FUNCTION performed after DROP USER for its definer no longer
produces unwarranted warning/error messages.
mysql-test/t/grant.test:
Added test coverage for bug#36544 "DROP USER does not remove stored
function privileges".
sql/sql_acl.cc:
Changed handle_grant_data() to also update hash with function
privileges. This allows DROP/RENAME USER correctly keep this
in-memory structure up-to-date.
To do this extended handle_grant_struct() to support updating of this
hash. In addition fixed code in this function which is responsible for
handling of column and routine hashes during RENAME USER, ensured that
we correctly update these hashes after changing user name and that we
don't skip elements while iterating through the hash and doing updates.
