1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-07-17 12:02:09 +03:00
Commit Graph

2010 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
3ebbfd88a0 MDEV-29159 Patch for MDEV-28918 introduces more inconsistency than it solves, breaks usability
1. Store assignment failures on incompatible data types now raise errors if:
- STRICT_ALL_TABLES or STRICT_TRANS_TABLES sql_mode is used, and
- IGNORE is not used

Otherwise, only a warning is raised and the statement continues.

2. Changing the error/warning test as follows:

-ERROR HY000: Illegal parameter data types inet6 and int for operation 'SET'
+ERROR HY000: Cannot cast 'int' as 'inet6' in assignment of `db`.`t`.`col`

so in case of a big table it's easier to see which column has the problem.
The new error text is also applied to SP variables.
2022-08-05 22:23:40 +04:00
742e1c727f Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2022-07-27 18:26:21 +03:00
30914389fe Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-07-27 17:52:37 +03:00
098c0f2634 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-07-27 17:17:24 +03:00
3bb36e9495 Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4 2022-07-27 11:02:57 +02:00
92a3280998 table_count was present twice in one class of LEX.
Remove table_count from Query_tables_list (not used, moved to MYSQL_LOCK).

Rename table_count from LEX to avoid mixing it with other counters of tables.
2022-07-14 09:46:06 +02:00
0bed4d72c0 MDEV-28918 Implicit cast from INET6 UNSIGNED works differently on UPDATE vs ALTER
Now INSERT, UPDATE, ALTER statements involving incompatible data type pairs, e.g.:

    UPDATE TABLE t1 SET col_inet6=col_int;
    INSERT INTO t1 (col_inet6) SELECT col_in FROM t2;
    ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY col_inet6 INT;

consistently return an error at the statement preparation time:

    ERROR HY000: Illegal parameter data types inet6 and int for operation 'SET'

and abort the statement before starting interating rows.

This error is the same with what is raised for queries like:
    SELECT col_inet6 FROM t1 UNION SELECT col_int FROM t2;
    SELECT COALESCE(col_inet6, col_int) FROM t1;

Before this change the error was caught only during the execution time,
when a Field_xxx::store_xxx() was called for the very firts row.
The behavior was not consistent between various statements and could do different things:
- abort the statement
- set a column to the data type default value (e.g. '::' for INET6)
- set a column to NULL

A typical old error was:

    ERROR 22007: Incorrect inet6 value: '1' for column `test`.`t1`.`a` at row 1

EXCEPTION:

Note, there is an exception: a multi-row INSERT..VALUES, e.g.:
    INSERT INTO t1 (col_a,col_b) VALUES (a1,b1),(a2,b2);
checks assignment compability at the preparation time for the very first row only:
    (col_a,col_b) vs (a1,b1)

Other rows are still checked at the execution time and return the old warnings
or errors in case of a failure. This is done because catching all rows at the
preparation time would change behavior significantly. So it still works
according to the STRICT_XXX_TABLES sql_mode flags and the table transaction ability.

This is too late to change this behavior in 10.7.
There is no a firm decision yet if a multi-row INSERT..VALUES
behavior will change in later versions.
2022-06-27 12:49:40 +04:00
f00ac20b03 Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2022-05-24 09:49:48 +03:00
e86c1e671a Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-05-23 08:28:10 +03:00
a0f0687f6c Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-05-23 08:07:56 +03:00
2f6a014fa2 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-05-23 08:07:03 +03:00
40d9dbb28f MDEV-28246 Optimizer uses all partitions after upgrade to 10.3
Cause: a copy of the joined TABLE_LIST is created during multi_update::prepare
and TABLE::pos_in_table_list of the tables are set to point to the new
TABLE_LIST object. This prevents some optimization steps to perform correctly.
Solution: do not update pos_in_table_list during multi_update::prepare
2022-05-19 08:31:01 +04:00
a4d753758f Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2022-03-30 08:52:05 +03:00
b242c3141f Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-03-29 16:16:21 +03:00
d62b0368ca Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-03-29 12:59:18 +03:00
ae6e214fd8 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2022-03-29 11:13:18 +03:00
ecb6f9c894 MDEV-28095 crash in multi-update and implicit grouping
disallow implicit grouping in multi-update.
explicit GROUP BY is not allowed by the grammar.
2022-03-17 16:58:48 +01:00
dc4b7f382b Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2022-03-15 15:25:31 +02:00
4ef44cc2f9 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2022-03-15 14:49:24 +02:00
e1246775a9 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2022-03-15 08:32:28 +02:00
9c6135e81f Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2022-03-15 08:10:35 +02:00
6789f2cfab MDEV-18304 sql_safe_updates does not work with OR clauses
not every index-using plan sets bits in table->quick_keys.
QUICK_ROR_INTERSECT_SELECT, for example, doesn't.

Use the fact that select->quick is set instead.

Also allow EXPLAIN to work.
2022-03-12 19:13:17 +01:00
a398fcbff6 MDEV-26635 ROW_NUMBER is not 0 for errors not caused because of rows 2021-10-26 17:29:40 +02:00
79185bd056 Merge 10.6 into 10.7 2021-09-24 15:32:39 +03:00
d95361107c Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2021-09-24 14:38:52 +03:00
7e2b42324c Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-09-24 08:42:23 +03:00
9024498e88 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2021-09-22 18:26:54 +03:00
9fc1ef932f MDEV-26545 Spider does not correctly handle UDF and stored function in where conds
- Handle stored function conditions correctly, with the same logic as with UDFs.
- When running queries on Spider SE, by default, we do not push down WHERE conditions containing usage of UDFs/stored functions to remote data nodes, unless the user demands (by setting spider_use_pushdown_udf).
- Disable direct update/delete when a udf condition is skipped.
2021-09-22 18:55:05 +09:00
0299ec29d4 cleanup: MY_BITMAP mutex
in about a hundred of users of MY_BITMAP, only two were using its
built-in mutex, and only one of those two was actually needing it.

Remove the mutex from MY_BITMAP, remove all associated conditions
and checks in bitmap functions. Use an external LOCK_temp_pool
mutex and temp_pool_set_next/temp_pool_clear_bit acccessors.

Remove bitmap_init/bitmap_free, always use my_* versions.
2021-08-26 23:39:52 +02:00
6efb5e9f5e Merge branch '10.5' into 10.6 2021-08-02 10:11:41 +02:00
ae6bdc6769 Merge branch '10.4' into 10.5 2021-07-31 23:19:51 +02:00
7841a7eb09 Merge branch '10.3' into 10.4 2021-07-31 22:59:58 +02:00
6190a02f35 Merge branch '10.2' into 10.3 2021-07-21 20:11:07 +02:00
c47e4aab62 MDEV-23597 Assertion `marked_for_read()' failed while evaluating DEFAULT
The columns that are part of DEFAULT expression were not read-marked
in statements like UPDATE...SET b=DEFAULT.

The problem is `F(DEFAULT)` expression depends of the left-hand side of an
assignment. However, setup_fields accepts only right-hand side value.
Neither Item::fix_fields does.

Suchwise, b=DEFAULT(b) works fine, because Item_default_field has
information on what field it is default of:
    if (thd->mark_used_columns != MARK_COLUMNS_NONE)
      def_field->default_value->expr->update_used_tables();

in Item_default_value::fix_fields().

It is not reasonable to pass a left-hand side to Item:fix_fields, because
the case is rare, so the rewrite
  b= F(DEFAULT)  ->  b= F(DEFAULT(b))

is made instead.

Both UPDATE and multi-UPDATE are affected, however any form of INSERT
is not: it marks all the fields in DEFAULT expressions for read in
TABLE::mark_default_fields_for_write().
2021-07-16 13:31:19 +03:00
f64a4f672a follow-up MDEV-18166: rename marking functions
Reformulate mark_columns_used_by_index* function family in a more laconic
way:

mark_columns_used_by_index -> mark_index_columns
mark_columns_used_by_index_for_read_no_reset -> mark_index_columns_for_read
mark_columns_used_by_index_no_reset -> mark_index_columns_no_reset
static mark_index_columns -> do_mark_index_columns
2021-07-12 22:00:40 +03:00
5478ca779a MDEV-25576: The statement EXPLAIN running as regular statement and as prepared statement produces different results for UPDATE with subquery
10.6 cleanup
2021-06-17 19:30:24 +02:00
a722ee88f3 Merge 10.5 into 10.6 2021-06-01 11:39:38 +03:00
9c7a456a92 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-06-01 10:38:09 +03:00
77d8da57d7 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2021-06-01 09:14:59 +03:00
950a220060 Merge 10.2 into 10.3 2021-06-01 08:40:59 +03:00
91bde0fb67 MDEV-25576: The statement EXPLAIN running as regular statement and as prepared statement produces different results for UPDATE with subquery
Both EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN EXTENDED statements produce different results set
in case it is run in normal way and in PS mode for the statements
UPDATE/DELETE with subquery.

The use case below reproduces the issue:
MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 INT KEY) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,128 sec)

MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t2 (c2 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,023 sec)

MariaDB [test]> CREATE TABLE t3 (c3 INT) ENGINE=MyISAM;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,021 sec)

MariaDB [test]> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
    -> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
    -> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
    -> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id   | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra                          |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
|    1 | PRIMARY     | t3    | ALL  | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    0 |   100.00 |                                |
|    2 | SUBQUERY    | NULL  | NULL | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL | NULL |     NULL | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,002 sec)

MariaDB [test]> PREPARE stmt FROM
    -> EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET c3 =
    -> ( SELECT COUNT(d1.c1) FROM ( SELECT a11.c1 FROM t1 AS a11
    -> STRAIGHT_JOIN t2 AS a21 ON a21.c2 = a11.c1 JOIN t1 AS a12
    -> ON a12.c1 = a11.c1 ) d1 );
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,000 sec)
Statement prepared

MariaDB [test]>  EXECUTE stmt;
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
| id   | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra                          |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
|    1 | PRIMARY     | t3    | ALL  | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    0 |   100.00 |                                |
|    2 | SUBQUERY    | NULL  | NULL | NULL          | NULL | NULL    | NULL | NULL |     NULL | no matching row in const table |
+------+-------------+-------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0,000 sec)

The reason by that different result sets are produced is that on execution
of the statement 'EXECUTE stmt' the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE not set
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for instances of SELECT_LEX that
correspond to subqueries used in the UPDTAE/DELETE statements.

Initially, these flags were set on parsing the statement
  PREPARE stmt FROM "EXPLAIN EXTENDED UPDATE t3 SET ..."
but latter they were reset before starting real execution of
the parsed query during handling the statement 'EXECUTE stmt';

So, to fix the issue the functions mysql_update()/mysql_delete()
have been modified to set the flag SELECT_DESCRIBE forcibly
in the data member SELECT_LEX::options for the primary SELECT_LEX
of the UPDATE/DELETE statement.
2021-05-30 17:31:55 +07:00
be093c81a7 MDEV-24089 support oracle syntax: rownum
The ROWNUM() function is for SELECT mapped to JOIN->accepted_rows, which is
incremented for each accepted rows.
For Filesort, update, insert, delete and load data, we map ROWNUM() to
internal variables incremented when the table is changed.
The connection between the row counter and Item_func_rownum is done
in sql_select.cc::fix_items_after_optimize() and
sql_insert.cc::fix_rownum_pointers()

When ROWNUM() is used anywhere in query, the optimization to ignore ORDER
BY in sub queries are disabled. This was done to get the following common
Oracle query to work:
select * from (select * from t1 order by a desc) as t where rownum() <= 2;
MDEV-3926 "Wrong result with GROUP BY ... WITH ROLLUP" contains a discussion
about this topic.

LIMIT optimization is enabled when in a top level WHERE clause comparing
ROWNUM() with a numerical constant using any of the following expressions:
- ROWNUM() < #
- ROWNUM() <= #
- ROWNUM() = 1
ROWNUM() can be also be the right argument to the comparison function.

LIMIT optimization is done in two cases:
- For the current sub query when the ROWNUM comparison is done on the top
  level:
  SELECT * from t1 WHERE rownum() <= 2 AND t1.a > 0
- For an inner sub query, when the upper level has only a ROWNUM comparison
  in the WHERE clause:
  SELECT * from (select * from t1) as t WHERE rownum() <= 2

In Oracle mode, one can also use ROWNUM without parentheses.

Other things:
- Fixed bug where the optimizer tries to optimize away sub queries
  with RAND_TABLE_BIT set (non-deterministic queries). Now these
  sub queries will not be converted to joins.  This bug fix was also
  needed to get rownum() working inside subqueries.
- In remove_const() remove setting simple_order to FALSE if ROLLUP is
  USED. This code was disable a long time ago because of wrong assignment
  in the following code.  Instead we set simple_order to false if
  RAND_TABLE_BIT was used in the SELECT list.  This ensures that
  we don't delete ORDER BY if the result set is not deterministic, like
  in 'SELECT RAND() AS 'r' FROM t1 ORDER BY r';
- Updated parameters for Sort_param::init_for_filesort() to be able
  to provide filesort with information where the number of accepted
  rows should be stored
- Reordered fields in class Filesort to optimize storage layout
- Added new error messsage to tell that a function can't be used in HAVING
- Added field 'with_rownum' to THD to mark that ROWNUM() is used in the
  query.

Co-author: Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
           LIMIT optimization for sub query
2021-05-19 22:54:11 +02:00
3f55c56951 Merge branch bb-10.4-release into bb-10.5-release 2021-05-05 23:57:11 +03:00
509e4990af Merge branch bb-10.3-release into bb-10.4-release 2021-05-05 23:03:01 +03:00
a8a925dd22 Merge branch bb-10.2-release into bb-10.3-release 2021-05-04 14:49:31 +03:00
b1ac251bf1 Another correction of the patch for MDEV-24823.
This commits replaces the call of the function setup_tables() with
a call of the function setup_tables_and_check_access() in the method
Multiupdate_prelocking_strategy::handle_end().
There is no known bug that would require this change. However the change
aligns this piece of code with the code existed before the patch for
MDEV-24823.
2021-04-28 17:39:04 -07:00
4725792bf3 Merge 10.4 into 10.5 2021-04-25 12:04:45 +03:00
e4394cc547 Merge 10.3 into 10.4 2021-04-25 10:20:57 +03:00
e3a25793be MDEV-24823 Crash with invalid multi-table update of view in 2nd execution of SP
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2021-04-22 20:02:08 -07:00
b3b5d57e78 MDEV-24823 Crash with invalid multi-table update of view in 2nd execution of SP
Before this patch mergeable derived tables / view used in a multi-table
update / delete were merged before the preparation stage.
When the merge of a derived table / view is performed the on expression
attached to it is fixed and ANDed with the where condition of the select S
containing this derived table / view. It happens after the specification of
the derived table / view has been merged into S. If the ON expression refers
to a non existing field an error is reported and some other mergeable derived
tables / views remain unmerged. It's not a problem if the multi-table
update / delete statement is standalone. Yet if it is used in a stored
procedure the select with incompletely merged derived tables / views may
cause a problem for the second call of the procedure. This does not happen
for select queries using derived tables / views, because in this case their
specifications are merged after the preparation stage at which all ON
expressions are fixed.
This patch makes sure that merging of the derived tables / views used in a
multi-table update / delete statement is performed after the preparation
stage.

Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
2021-04-22 13:56:50 -07:00