Now both offset and limit are stored and do not chenged during execution
(offset is decreased during processing in versions before 10.5).
(Big part of this changes made by Monty)
Shift-Reduce conflicts prevented parsing some queries with subqueries that
used set operations when the subqueries occurred in expressions or in IN
predicands.
The grammar rules for query expression were transformed in order to avoid
these conflicts. New grammar rules employ an idea taken from MySQL 8.0.
A CTE can be defined as a table values constructor. In this case the CTE is
always materialized in a temporary table.
If the definition of the CTE contains a list of the names of the CTE
columns then the query expression that uses this CTE can refer to the CTE
columns by these names. Otherwise the names of the columns are taken from
the names of the columns in the result set of the query that specifies the
CTE.
Thus if the column names of a CTE are provided in the definition the
columns of result set should be renamed. In a general case renaming of
the columns is done in the select lists of the query specifying the CTE.
If a CTE is specified by a table value constructor then there are no such
select lists and renaming is actually done for the columns of the result
of materialization.
Now if a view is specified by a query expression that uses a CTE specified
by a table value constructor saving the column names of the CTE in the
stored view definition becomes critical: without these names the query
expression is not able to refer to the columns of the CTE.
This patch saves the given column names of CTEs in stored view definitions
that use them.
query with VALUES()
A table value constructor can be used in all contexts where a select
can be used. In particular an ORDER BY clause or a LIMIT clause or both
of them can be attached to a table value constructor to produce a new
query. Unfortunately execution of such queries was not supported.
This patch fixes the problem.
If a derived table has SELECT DISTINCT, provide index statistics for it so that the join optimizer in the
upper select knows that ref access to the table will produce one row.
The MDEV-17262 commit 26432e49d3
was skipped. In Galera 4, the implementation would seem to require
changes to the streaming replication.
In the tests archive.rnd_pos main.profiling, disable_ps_protocol
for SHOW STATUS and SHOW PROFILE commands until MDEV-18974
has been fixed.
1. Always drop merged_for_insert flag on cleanup (there could be errors which prevent TABLE to be assigned)
2. Make more precise cleanup of select parts which was touched
When the with clause of a query contains a recursive CTE that is not used
then processing of EXPLAIN for this query does not require optimization
of the unit specifying this CTE. In this case if 'derived' is the
TABLE_LIST object created for this CTE then derived->derived_result is NULL
and any assignment to derived->derived_result->table causes a crash.
After fixing this problem in the code of st_select_lex_unit::prepare()
EXPLAIN for such a query worked without crashes. Yet an execution
plan for the recursive CTE appeared there. The cause of this problem was
an incorrect condition used in JOIN::save_explain_data_intern() that
determined whether CTE was to be optimized or not. A similar condition was
used in select_describe() and this patch has corrected it as well.
The function st_select_lex_unit::exec_recursive() missed resetting of
select_limit_cnt and offset_limit_cnt before execution of union parts.
As a result recursive CTEs specified by UNIONs whose SELECTs contained
LIMIT/OFFSET could return wrong sets of records.
This problem manifested itself when a join query used two or more
materialized CTE such that each of them employed the same recursive CTE.
The bug caused a crash. The crash happened because the cleanup()
function was performed premature for recursive CTE. This clean up was
induced by the cleanup of the first CTE referenced the recusrsive CTE.
This cleanup destroyed the structures that would allow to read from the
temporary table containing the rows of the recursive CTE and an attempt to read
these rows for the second CTE referencing the recursive CTE triggered a
crash.
The clean up for a recursive CTE R should be performed after the cleanup
of the last materialized CTE that uses R.
value constructor shows wrong number of rows
If the specification of a derived table contained a table value constructor
then the optimizer incorrectly estimated the number of rows in the derived
table. This happened because the optimizer did not take into account the
number of rows in the constructor. The wrong estimate could lead to choosing
inefficient execution plans.
This is to mark that a field is indirectly part of a key, which simplifes
checking if we need to have this field up to date to evaluate a key.
For example:
CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b int as (a) virtual,
c int as (b) virtual, index(c))
would mark a and b with PART_INDIRECT_KEY_FLAG.
c is marked with PART_KEY_FLAG as before.
This bug caused crashes for queries with unreferenced non-recursive
CTEs specified by unions.It happened because the function
st_select_lex_unit::prepare() tried to use the value of the field 'derived'
that could not be set for unferenced CTEs as there was no derived
table associated with an unreferenced CTE.
