disable bulk insert optimization if long uniques are used, because they
need to read the table (index_read) after every inserted now. And bulk
insert optimization might disable indexes.
bulk insert is already disabled in other cases when there are chances
that the table will be read duing the bulk insert.
node->is_delete was incorrectly set to NO_DELETE for a set of operations.
In general we shouldn't rely on sql_command and look for more abstract ways
to control the behavior.
trg_event_map seems to be a suitable way. To mind replica nodes, it is ORed
with slave_fk_event_map, which stores trg_event_map when replica has
triggers disabled.
regression from MDEV-29540 / 8c38939369.
INSERT SELECT errors needed to be unconditionally ignored.
As this touches the CREATE .. SELECT functionality, show
the equalivent test there.
When a range rowid filter was used with an index ref access the cost of
accessing the index entries for the records rejected by the filter was not
taken into account. For a ref access by an index with big average number
of records per key this led to poor execution plans if selectivity of the
used filter was high.
The patch resolves this problem. It also introduces a minor optimization
that skips look-ups into a filter that turns out to be empty.
With this patch the output of ANALYZE stmt reports the number of look-ups
into used rowid filters.
The patch also back-ports from 10.5 the code that properly sets the field
TABLE::file::table for opened temporary tables.
The test cases that were supposed to use rowid filters have been adjusted
in order to use similar execution plans after this fix.
Approved by Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@mariadb.com>
The ALTER related code cannot do at the same time both:
- modify partitions
- change column data types
Explicit changing of a column data type together with a partition change is
prohibited by the parter, so this is not allowed and returns a syntax error:
ALTER TABLE t MODIFY ts BIGINT, DROP PARTITION p1;
This fix additionally disables implicit data type upgrade
(e.g. from "MariaDB 5.3 TIME" to "MySQL 5.6 TIME", or the other way
around according to the current mysql56_temporal_format) in case of
an ALTER modifying partitions, e.g.:
ALTER TABLE t DROP PARTITION p1;
In such commands now only the partition change happens, while
the data types stay unchanged.
One can additionally run:
ALTER TABLE t FORCE;
either before or after the ALTER modifying partitions to
upgrade data types according to mysql56_temporal_format.
To prevent ASAN heap-use-after-poison in the MDEV-16549 part of
./mtr --repeat=6 main.derived
the initialization of Name_resolution_context was cleaned up.
The population of default values in INSERT SELECT was being
performed twice. With sequences, this resulted in every
second sequence value being used.
With SELECT INSERT we remove the second invokation of
table->update_default_fields(). This was already performed
in store_values() invoking fill_record_n_invoke_before_triggers()
which invoked update_default_fields() previously.
We do need to return an error on duplicate values, so the
::store_values is extended to take the ignore option.
1. Store assignment failures on incompatible data types now raise errors if:
- STRICT_ALL_TABLES or STRICT_TRANS_TABLES sql_mode is used, and
- IGNORE is not used
Otherwise, only a warning is raised and the statement continues.
2. Changing the error/warning test as follows:
-ERROR HY000: Illegal parameter data types inet6 and int for operation 'SET'
+ERROR HY000: Cannot cast 'int' as 'inet6' in assignment of `db`.`t`.`col`
so in case of a big table it's easier to see which column has the problem.
The new error text is also applied to SP variables.
Not the SPIDER issue - happens to INSERT DELAYED.
the field::make_new_field does't copy the LONG_UNIQUE_HASH_FIELD
flag to the new field. Though the Delayed_insert::get_local_table
copies the field->vcol_info for this field. Ad a result
the parse_vcol_defs doesn't create the expression for that column
so the field->vcol_info->expr is NULL. Which leads to crash.
Backported fix for this from 10.5 - the flagg added in the
Delayed_insert::get_local_table.
Another problem with the USING HASH key is thst the
parse_vcol_defs modifies the table->keys content. Then the same
parse_vcol_defs is called on the table copy that has keys already
modified. Backported fix for that from 10.5 - key copying added
tot the Delayed_insert::get_local_table.
Finally - the created copy has to clear the expr_arena as
this table is not in the thd->open_tables list so won't be
cleared automatically.
1. For INSERT..SELECT statements: don't include table/view the data
is inserted into in the list of leaf tables
2. Remove duplicated and dead code related to table_count
Now INSERT, UPDATE, ALTER statements involving incompatible data type pairs, e.g.:
UPDATE TABLE t1 SET col_inet6=col_int;
INSERT INTO t1 (col_inet6) SELECT col_in FROM t2;
ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY col_inet6 INT;
consistently return an error at the statement preparation time:
ERROR HY000: Illegal parameter data types inet6 and int for operation 'SET'
and abort the statement before starting interating rows.
This error is the same with what is raised for queries like:
SELECT col_inet6 FROM t1 UNION SELECT col_int FROM t2;
SELECT COALESCE(col_inet6, col_int) FROM t1;
Before this change the error was caught only during the execution time,
when a Field_xxx::store_xxx() was called for the very firts row.
The behavior was not consistent between various statements and could do different things:
- abort the statement
- set a column to the data type default value (e.g. '::' for INET6)
- set a column to NULL
A typical old error was:
ERROR 22007: Incorrect inet6 value: '1' for column `test`.`t1`.`a` at row 1
EXCEPTION:
Note, there is an exception: a multi-row INSERT..VALUES, e.g.:
INSERT INTO t1 (col_a,col_b) VALUES (a1,b1),(a2,b2);
checks assignment compability at the preparation time for the very first row only:
(col_a,col_b) vs (a1,b1)
Other rows are still checked at the execution time and return the old warnings
or errors in case of a failure. This is done because catching all rows at the
preparation time would change behavior significantly. So it still works
according to the STRICT_XXX_TABLES sql_mode flags and the table transaction ability.
This is too late to change this behavior in 10.7.
There is no a firm decision yet if a multi-row INSERT..VALUES
behavior will change in later versions.
MDEV-21810 MBR: Unexpected "Unsafe statement" warning for unsafe IODKU
MDEV-17614 fixes to replication unsafety for INSERT ON DUP KEY UPDATE
on two or more unique key table left a flaw. The fixes checked the
safety condition per each inserted record with the idea to catch a user-created
value to an autoincrement column and when that succeeds the autoincrement column
would become the source of unsafety too.
It was not expected that after a duplicate error the next record's
write_set may become different and the unsafe decision for that
specific record will be computed to screw the Query's binlogging
state and when @@binlog_format is MIXED nothing gets bin-logged.
This case has been already fixed in 10.5.2 by 91ab42a823 that
relocated/optimized THD::decide_logging_format_low() out of the record insert
loop. The safety decision is computed once and at the right time.
Pertinent parts of the commit are cherry-picked.
Also a spurious warning about unsafety is removed when MIXED
@@binlog_format; original MDEV-17614 test result corrected.
The original test of MDEV-17614 is extended and made more readable.
CHECK violation
Analysis: When there is constraint fail we return non-zero value for
view_check_option(). So we continue the loop which doesn't increment the
counter because it increments at the end of the loop.
Fix: Increment m_current_row_for_warning() at the beginning of loop. This
will also fix similar bugs if any, about counter not incrementing
correctly because of continue.
ER_WRONG_VALUE_COUNT_ON_ROW for the 1st row
Analysis: Current row for warning does not increment for prepare phase
Fix: Increment current row for warning if number of fields in the table and
row values dont match and number of values in rows is greater than number
of fields
in case of a bulk insert the server sends all rows to the engine, and
then the engine replies that there was ER_DUP_ENTRY somewhere.
the exact number of the row that caused the error is unknown.
