1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-29 00:08:14 +03:00
Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sven Sandberg
e37c86de18 Merged BUG#49978 from 5.1-bugteam to 5.5-bugteam. 2010-12-19 18:15:12 +01:00
Davi Arnaut
7d64c36486 Bug#56096: STOP SLAVE hangs if executed in parallel with user sleep
The root of the problem is that to interrupt a slave SQL thread
wait, the STOP SLAVE implementation uses thd->awake(THD::NOT_KILLED).
This appears as a spurious wakeup (e.g. from a sleep on a
condition variable) to the code that the slave SQL thread is
executing at the time of the STOP. If the code is not written
to be spurious-wakeup safe, unexpected behavior can occur. For
the reported case, this problem led to an infinite loop around
the interruptible_wait() function in item_func.cc (SLEEP()
function implementation).  The loop was not being properly
restarted and, consequently, would not come to an end. Since the
SLEEP function sleeps on a timed event in order to be killable
and to perform periodic checks until the requested time has
elapsed, the spurious wake up was causing the requested sleep
time to be reset every two seconds.

The solution is to calculate the requested absolute time only
once and to ensure that the thread only sleeps until this
time is elapsed. In case of a spurious wake up, the sleep is
restarted using the previously calculated absolute time. This
restores the behavior present in previous releases. If a slave
thread is executing a SLEEP function, a STOP SLAVE statement
will wait until the time requested in the sleep function
has elapsed.
2010-10-13 22:54:07 -03:00
Sven Sandberg
a651824329 BUG#50670: Slave stops with error code 1644
Clarified error messages related to unsafe statements:
 - avoid the internal technical term "row injection"
 - use 'binary log' instead of 'binlog'
 - avoid the word 'unsafeness'
2010-04-28 14:47:49 +02:00
Andrei Elkin
070d190906 mergin 5.1 -> rep+2 -> rep+3. create_table_from_dump issue will be merged on the next step 2009-11-30 20:20:26 +02:00
Alfranio Correia
60d4662496 WL#2687 WL#5072 BUG#40278 BUG#47175
Non-transactional updates that take place inside a transaction present problems
for logging because they are visible to other clients before the transaction
is committed, and they are not rolled back even if the transaction is rolled
back. It is not always possible to log correctly in statement format when both
transactional and non-transactional tables are used in the same transaction.

In the current patch, we ensure that such scenario is completely safe under the
ROW and MIXED modes.
2009-11-03 19:02:56 +00:00