Bug#16565 mysqld --help --verbose does not order variablesBug#20413 sql_slave_skip_counter is not shown in show variables
Bug#20415 Output of mysqld --help --verbose is incomplete
Bug#25430 variable not found in SELECT @@global.ft_max_word_len;
Bug#32902 plugin variables don't know their names
Bug#34599 MySQLD Option and Variable Reference need to be consistent in formatting!
Bug#34829 No default value for variable and setting default does not raise error
Bug#34834 ? Is accepted as a valid sql mode
Bug#34878 Few variables have default value according to documentation but error occurs
Bug#34883 ft_boolean_syntax cant be assigned from user variable to global var.
Bug#37187 `INFORMATION_SCHEMA`.`GLOBAL_VARIABLES`: inconsistent status
Bug#40988 log_output_basic.test succeeded though syntactically false.
Bug#41010 enum-style command-line options are not honoured (maria.maria-recover fails)
Bug#42103 Setting key_buffer_size to a negative value may lead to very large allocations
Bug#44691 Some plugins configured as MYSQL_PLUGIN_MANDATORY in can be disabled
Bug#44797 plugins w/o command-line options have no disabling option in --help
Bug#46314 string system variables don't support expressions
Bug#46470 sys_vars.max_binlog_cache_size_basic_32 is broken
Bug#46586 When using the plugin interface the type "set" for options caused a crash.
Bug#47212 Crash in DBUG_PRINT in mysqltest.cc when trying to print octal number
Bug#48758 mysqltest crashes on sys_vars.collation_server_basic in gcov builds
Bug#49417 some complaints about mysqld --help --verbose output
Bug#49540 DEFAULT value of binlog_format isn't the default value
Bug#49640 ambiguous option '--skip-skip-myisam' (double skip prefix)
Bug#49644 init_connect and \0
Bug#49645 init_slave and multi-byte characters
Bug#49646 mysql --show-warnings crashes when server dies
'LOAD DATA CONCURRENT [LOCAL] INFILE ...' statment only is binlogged as
'LOAD DATA [LOCAL] INFILE ...' in SBR and MBR. As a result, if replication is on,
queries on slaves will be blocked by the replication SQL thread.
This patch write code to write 'CONCURRENT' into the log event if 'CONCURRENT' option
is in the original statement in SBR and MBR.
Problem: Some system functions that could return different values on
master and slave were not marked unsafe. In particular:
GET_LOCK
IS_FREE_LOCK
IS_USED_LOCK
MASTER_POS_WAIT
RELEASE_LOCK
SLEEP
SYSDATE
VERSION
Fix: Mark these functions unsafe.
One statement that have more than one different tables to update with
autoinc columns just was marked as unsafe in mixed mode, so the unsafe
warning can't be produced in statement mode.
To fix the problem, mark the statement as unsafe in statement mode too.
For application compatibility reasons MySQL converts "<autoincrement_column> IS NULL"
predicates to "<autoincrement_column> = LAST_INSERT_ID()" in the first SELECT following an
INSERT regardless of whether they're top level predicates or not. This causes wrong and
obscure results when these predicates are combined with others on the same columns. Fixed
by only doing the transformation on a single top-level predicate if a special SQL mode is
turned on (sql_auto_is_null).
Also made sql_auto_is_null off by default.
per-file comments:
mysql-test/r/func_isnull.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test result updated
mysql-test/t/func_isnull.test
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test case added
sql/mysqld.cc
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
sql_auto_is_null now is OFF by default.
sql/sql_select.cc
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
remove_eq_conds() split in two parts - one only checks the upper condition,
the req_remove_eq_conds() recursively checks all the condition tree.
mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_insert_id.test
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test fixed (set the sql_auto_is_null variable)
mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/mysqlbinlog2.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/odbc.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/query_cache.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/r/user_var-binlog.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_row_ctype_ucs.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_stm_ctype_ucs.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_insert_id.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_mysqlbinlog.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_sp.result
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
result updated
mysql-test/t/odbc.test
Bug#41371 Select returns 1 row with condition "col is not null and col is null"
test fixed (set the sql_auto_is_null variable)
binlog, replication aborts
In SBR or MBR, the schema name is not being written to the binlog
when executing a LOAD DATA statement. This becomes a problem when
the current database (lets call it db1) is different from the
table's schema (lets call it db2). For instance, take the
following statements:
use db1;
load data local infile 'infile.txt' into table db2.t
Should this statement be logged without t's schema (db2), when
replaying it, one can get db1.t populated instead of db2.t (if
db1.t exists). On the other hand, if there is no db1.t at all,
replication will stop.
We fix this by always logging the table (in load file) with fully
qualified name when its schema is different from the current
database or when no default database was selected.
Conflicts
=========
Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in libmysqld/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in libmysqld/Makefile.am
Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.experimental
Text conflict in mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/rpl_row_sp006.test
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_tmp_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_create_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_sp006_InnoDB.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_circular_simplex.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl_ndb/r/rpl_ndb_sp006.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/CMakeLists.txt
Text conflict in sql/Makefile.am
Text conflict in sql/log_event_old.cc
Text conflict in sql/rpl_rli.cc
Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_binlog.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_lex.h
21 conflicts encountered.
NOTE
====
mysql-5.1-rpl-merge has been made a mirror of mysql-next-mr:
- "mysql-5.1-rpl-merge$ bzr pull ../mysql-next-mr"
This is the first cset (merge/...) committed after pulling
from mysql-next-mr.
Backporting BUG#43789 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
Backporting BUG#38173 to mysql-5.1-bugteam
The reason of the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
The problem is that there is only one autoinc value associated with
the query when binlogging. If more than one autoinc values are used
in the query, the autoinc values after the first one can be inserted
wrongly on slave. So these autoinc values can become inconsistent on
master and slave.
The problem is resolved by marking all the statements that invoke
a trigger or call a function that updated autoinc fields as unsafe,
and will switch to row-format in Mixed mode. Actually, the statement
is safe if just one autoinc value is used in sub-statement, but it's
impossible to check how many autoinc values are used in sub-statement.)
vs not null
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
The replication was generating corrupted data, warning messages on Valgrind
and aborting on debug mode while replicating a "null" to "not null" field.
Specifically the unpack_row routine, was considering the slave's table
definition and trying to retrieve a field value, where there was nothing to be
retrieved, ignoring the fact that the value was defined as "null" by the master.
To fix the problem, we proceed as follows:
1 - If it is not STRICT sql_mode, implicit default values are used, regardless
if it is multi-row or single-row statement.
2 - However, if it is STRICT mode, then a we do what follows:
2.1 If it is a transactional engine, we do a rollback on the first NULL that is
to be set into a NOT NULL column and return an error.
2.2 If it is a non-transactional engine and it is the first row to be inserted
with multi-row, we also return the error. Otherwise, we proceed with the
execution, use implicit default values and print out warning messages.
Unfortunately, the current patch cannot mimic the behavior showed by the master
for updates on multi-tables and multi-row inserts. This happens because such
statements are unfolded in different row events. For instance, considering the
following updates and strict mode:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (0) as this would be handled as a
multi-row update. On the other hand, if we had the following updates:
(master)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
(slave)
create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int not null);
(master)
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
update t1, t2 SET t1.a=10, t2.a=NULL;
On the master t1 would have (10) and t2 would have (NULL). On
the slave, t1 would have (10) but the update on t1 would fail.
NOTE: Backporting the patch to next-mr.
The reason of the bug was incompatibile with the master side behaviour.
INSERT query on the master is allowed to insert into a table without specifying
values of DEFAULT-less fields if sql_mode is not strict.
Fixed with checking sql_mode by the sql thread to decide how to react.
Non-strict sql_mode should allow Write_rows event to complete.
todo: warnings can be shown via show slave status, still this is a
separate rather general issue how to show warnings for the slave threads.
files
NOTE: this is the backport to next-mr.
SHOW BINLOG EVENTS does not work with relay log files. If issuing
"SHOW BINLOG EVENTS IN 'relay-log.000001'" in a non-empty relay
log file (relay-log.000001), mysql reports empty set.
This patch addresses this issue by extending the SHOW command
with RELAYLOG. Events in relay log files can now be inspected by
issuing SHOW RELAYLOG EVENTS [IN 'log_name'] [FROM pos] [LIMIT
[offset,] row_count].
failure to cleanup of table
The test case was not dropping a table before exiting (ie, it was
not cleaning itself after execution). In this case, the warning
message stating that the test did not do a proper cleanup was
deterministic (which can be annoying).
I have found other tests cases on which mtr sporadically reports
that they have not cleaned up after execution:
- rpl_ndb_circular
- rpl_failed_optimize
In this case, the master was dropping a table but there was no
synchronization between the slave and the master.
This patch addresses the rpl_ndb_circular_simplex case by adding
the missing DROP table. The other cases are fixed by deploying
the missing sync_slave_with_master instruction.
Network error happened here, but it can be caused by CR_CONNECTION_ERROR,
CR_CONN_HOST_ERROR, CR_SERVER_GONE_ERROR, CR_SERVER_LOST, ER_CON_COUNT_ERROR,
and ER_SERVER_SHUTDOWN. We just check CR_SERVER_LOST here, so the test fails.
To fix the problem, check all errors that can be cause by the master shutdown.
In RBR, There is an inconsistency between slaves and master.
When INSERT statement which includes an auto_increment field is executed,
Store engine of master will check the value of the auto_increment field.
It will generate a sequence number and then replace the value, if its value is NULL or empty.
if the field's value is 0, the store engine will do like encountering the NULL values
unless NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO is set into SQL_MODE.
In contrast, if the field's value is 0, Store engine of slave always generates a new sequence number
whether or not NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO is set into SQL_MODE.
SQL MODE of slave sql thread is always consistency with master's.
Another variable is related to this bug.
If generateing a sequence number is decided by the values of
table->auto_increment_field_not_null and SQL_MODE(if includes MODE_NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO)
The table->auto_increment_is_not_null is FALSE, which causes this bug to appear. ..
Essentially, Bug#45574 results in this bug. The 'CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS' statement was not
binlogged, when the database has existed.
Sometimes, the master and slaves become inconsistent. The "CREATE DATABASE
IF NOT EXISTS mysqltest1" statement is not binlogged
if the db 'mysqltest1' existed before the test case is executed.
So the db 'mysqltest1' can't be created on slave.
Patch of Bug#45574 has resolved this problem.
But I think it is better to replace 'mysqltest1' by default db 'test'.
Slave does not correctly handle "expected errors" leading to inconsistencies
between the mater and slave. Specifically, when a statement changes both
transactional and non-transactional tables, the transactional changes are
automatically rolled back on the master but the slave ignores the error and
does not roll them back thus leading to inconsistencies.
To fix the problem, we automatically roll back a statement that fails on
the slave but note that the transaction is not rolled back unless a "rollback"
command is in the relay log file.
binlog
Mixing transactional (T) and non-transactional (N) tables on behalf of a
transaction may lead to inconsistencies among masters and slaves in STATEMENT
mode. The problem stems from the fact that although modifications done to
non-transactional tables on behalf of a transaction become immediately visible
to other connections they do not immediately get to the binary log and therefore
consistency is broken. Although there may be issues in mixing T and M tables in
STATEMENT mode, there are safe combinations that clients find useful.
In this bug, we fix the following issue. Mixing N and T tables in multi-level
(e.g. a statement that fires a trigger) or multi-table table statements (e.g.
update t1, t2...) were not handled correctly. In such cases, it was not possible
to distinguish when a T table was updated if the sequence of changes was N and T.
In a nutshell, just the flag "modified_non_trans_table" was not enough to reflect
that both a N and T tables were changed. To circumvent this issue, we check if an
engine is registered in the handler's list and changed something which means that
a T table was modified.
Check WL 2687 for a full-fledged patch that will make the use of either the MIXED or
ROW modes completely safe.
The "get_master_version_and_clock(...)" function in sql/slave.cc ignores
error and passes directly when queries fail, or queries succeed
but the result retrieved is empty.
The "get_master_version_and_clock(...)" function should try to reconnect master
if queries fail because of transient network problems, and fail otherwise.
The I/O thread should print a warning if the some system variables do not
exist on master (very old master)
The test case added failed sporadically on PB. This is due to the
fact that the user thread in some cases is waiting for slave IO
to stop and then check the error number. Thence, sometimes the
user thread would race for the error number with IO thread.
This post push fix addresses this by replacing the wait for slave
io to stop with a wait for slave io error (as it seems it was
added in 6.0 also after patch on which this is based was
pushed). This implied backporting wait_for_slave_io_error.inc
from 6.0 also.
The server was not cleaning the last IO error and error number when
resetting slave.
This patch addresses this issue by backporting into 5.1 part of the
patch in BUG 34654. A fix for this issue had already been pushed into
6.0 as part of the aforementioned bug, however the patch also included
some refactoring. The fix for 5.1 does not take into account the
refactoring part.
1. Test case was rewritten completely.
2. Test covers 3 cases:
a) do deadlock on slave, wait retries of transaction, unlock slave before lock
timeout;
b) do deadlock on slave and wait error 'lock timeout exceed' on slave;
c) same as b) but if of max relay log size = 0;
3. Added comments inline.
4. Updated result file.
