If, after the tables are locked, one of the conditions to read from a
HANDLER table is not met, the handler code wrongly jumps to a error path
that won't unlock the tables.
The user-visible effect is that after a error in a handler read command,
all subsequent handler operations on the same table will hang.
The fix is simply to correct the code to jump to the (same) error path that
unlocks the tables.
The problem from a user's perspective: user creates table A, and then tries
to CREATE TABLE a SELECT from A - and this causes a deadlock error, a hang,
or fails with a debug assert, but only if the storage engine is InnoDB.
The origin of the problem: InnoDB uses case-insensitive collation
(system_charset_info) when looking up the internal table share, thus returning
the same share for 'a' and 'A'.
Cause of the user-visible behavior: since the same share is returned to SQL
locking subsystem, it assumes that the same table is first locked (within the
same session) for WRITE, and then for READ, and returns a deadlock error.
However, the code is wrong in not properly cleaning up upon an error, leaving
external locks in place, which leads to assertion failures and hangs.
Fix that has been implemented: the SQL layer should properly propagate the
deadlock error, cleaning up and freeing all resources.
Further work towards a more complete solution: InnoDB should not use case
insensitive collation for table share hash if table names on disk honor the case.
MySQL replicates the time zone only when operations that involve
it are performed. This is controlled by a flag. But this flag
is set only on successful operation.
The flag must be set also when there is an error that involves
a timezone (so the master would replicate the error to the slaves).
A test case was waiting for a fixed number of seconds for a specific
state of the slave IO thread to take place.
Fixed by waiting in a loop for that specific thread state instead
(or timeout).
using TPC-B):
Problem: A RBR event can contain incomplete row data (only key value and
fields which have been changed). In that case, when the row is unpacked
into record and written to a table, the missing fields get incorrect NULL
values leading to master-slave inconsistency.
Solution: Use values found in slave's table for columns which are not given
in the rows event. The code for writing a single row uses the following
algorithm:
1. unpack row_data into table->record[0],
2. try to insert record,
3. if duplicate record found, fetch it into table->record[0],
4. unpack row_data into table->record[0],
5. write table->record[0] into the table.
Where row_data is the row as stored in the data area of a rows event.
Thus:
a) unpacking of row_data happens at the time when row is written into
a table,
b) when unpacking (in step 4), only columns present in row_data are
overwritten - all other columns remain as they were found in the table.
Since all data needed for the above algorithm is stored inside
Rows_log_event class, functions which locate and write rows are turned
into methods of that class.
replace_record() -> Rows_log_event::write_row()
find_and_fetch_row() -> Rows_log_event::find_row()
Both methods take row data from event's data buffer - the row being
processed is pointed by m_curr_row. They unpack the data as needed into
table's record buffers record[0] or record[1]. When row is unpacked,
m_curr_row_end is set to point at next row in the data buffer.
Other changes introduced in this changeset:
- Change signature of unpack_row(): don't report errors and don't
setup table's rw_set here. Errors can happen only when setting default
values in prepare_record() function and are detected there.
- In Rows_log_event and derived classes, don't pass arguments to
the execution primitives (do_...() member functions) but use class
members instead.
- Move old row handling code into log_event_old.cc to be used by
*_rows_log_event_old classes.
Also, a new test rpl_ndb_2other is added which tests basic replication
from master using ndb tables to slave storing the same tables using
(possibly) different engine (myisam,innodb).
Test is based on existing tests rpl_ndb_2myisam and rpl_ndb_2innodb.
However, these tests doesn't work for various reasons and currently are
disabled (see BUG#19227).
The new test differs from the ones it is based on as follows:
1. Single test tests replication with different storage engines on slave
(myisam, innodb, ndb).
2. Include file extra/rpl_tests/rpl_ndb_2multi_eng.test containing
original tests is replaced by extra/rpl_tests/rpl_ndb_2multi_basic.test
which doesn't contain tests using partitioned tables as these don't work
currently. Instead, it tests replication to a slave which has more or
less columns than master.
3. Include file include/rpl_multi_engine3.inc is replaced with
include/rpl_multi_engine2.inc. The later differs by performing slightly
different operations (updating more than one row in the table) and
clearing table with "TRUNCATE TABLE" statement instead of "DELETE FROM"
as replication of "DELETE" doesn't work well in this setting.
4. Slave must use option --log-slave-updates=0 as otherwise execution of
replication events generated by ndb fails if table uses a different
storage engine on slave (see BUG#29569).
Bug #16979: AUTO_INC lock in InnoDB works a table level lock
- this is a major change in InnoDB auto-inc handling.
Bug #27950: Duplicate entry error in auto-inc after mysqld restart
- Init AUTOINC from delete_row().
Bug #28781: InnoDB increments auto-increment value incorrectly with ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
- Use value specified by MySQL, in update_row().
Recommit to 5.1.22.
The bug caused memory corruption for some queries with top OR level
in the WHERE condition if they contained equality predicates and
other sargable predicates in disjunctive parts of the condition.
The corruption happened because the upper bound of the memory
allocated for KEY_FIELD and SARGABLE_PARAM internal structures
containing info about potential lookup keys was calculated incorrectly
in some cases. In particular it was calculated incorrectly when the
WHERE condition was an OR formula with disjuncts being AND formulas
including equalities and other sargable predicates.
In the ha_partition::position() we didn't calculate the number
of the partition of the record. We used m_last_part value instead,
relying on that it is set in other place like previous call of a method
like ::write_row(). In replication we don't call any of these befor
position(). Delete_rows_log_event::do_exec_row calls find_and_fetch_row.
In case of InnoDB-based PARTITION table, we have HA_PRIMARY_KEY_REQUIRED_FOR_POSITION
enabled, so use position() / rnd_pos() calls to fetch the record.
Fixed by adding partition_id calculation to the ha_partition::position()
Test case contains possible race conditions. This patch fixes these race
conditions and also adjust the test to execute according to its documentation.
SQL_MODE was ignored when a client issued INSERT DELAYED.
Some system settings weren't copied as intended when a record was saved for
a delayed insert.
