The loop in the binary search in remove_status_vars() was
incorrectly implemented and could continue infinitely in some cases.
Rewrote the binary search code.
Updated information in SHOW AUTHORS and SHOW CONTRIBUTORS
SHOW AUTHORS and SHOW CONTRIBUTORS are not depricated anymore.
CMakeLists.txt:
Install TODO and CREDITS files
CREDITS:
Information about the MariaDB foundation
README:
Updated to include the MariaDB foundation
mysql-test/r/contributors.result:
Updated contributors
mysql-test/r/show_check.result:
SHOW AUTHORS and SHOW CONTRIBUTORS are not depricated anymore.
scripts/make_binary_distribution.sh:
Added TODO and CREDITS
sql/authors.h:
Updated list of active authors
sql/contributors.h:
Updated list of active contributors and members of the MariaDB foundation
sql/sql_show.cc:
Extend comment lengths
sql/sql_yacc.yy:
SHOW AUTHORS and SHOW CONTRIBUTORS are not depricated anymore
It is now possible to kill query by query id. KILL syntax was extended to:
KILL [HARD | SOFT] [CONNECTION | QUERY [ID query_id]] [thread_id | USER user_name]
Added QUERY_ID column to INFORMATION_SCHEMA.PROCESSLIST.
Fixed tests affected by this change:
- added PROCESSLIST.QUERY_ID column
- ID is now keyword and is quoted in SHOW CREATE TABLE output
- PFS statement digest is calculated basing on token id
(not token text). Token id has shifted for keywords residing
after ID in keywords array.
"SHOW PROCESSLIST"
Analysis:
----------
The problem here is, if one connection changes its
default db and at the same time another connection executes
"SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
memory.
The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
reported here.
Fix:
----------
Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
and while copying it to processlist.
"SHOW PROCESSLIST"
Analysis:
----------
The problem here is, if one connection changes its
default db and at the same time another connection executes
"SHOW PROCESSLIST", when it wants to read db of the another
connection then there is a chance of accessing the invalid
memory.
The db name stored in THD is not guarded while changing user
DB and while reading the user DB in "SHOW PROCESSLIST".
So, if THD.db is freed by thd "owner" thread and if another
thread executing "SHOW PROCESSLIST" statement tries to read
and copy THD.db at the same time then we may endup in the issue
reported here.
Fix:
----------
Used mutex "LOCK_thd_data" to guard THD.db while freeing it
and while copying it to processlist.
Following variables do not require LOCK_open protection anymore:
- table_def_cache (renamed to tdc_hash) is protected by rw-lock
LOCK_tdc_hash;
- table_def_shutdown_in_progress doesn't need LOCK_open protection;
- last_table_id use atomics;
- TABLE_SHARE::ref_count (renamed to TABLE_SHARE::tdc.ref_count)
is protected by TABLE_SHARE::tdc.LOCK_table_share;
- TABLE_SHARE::next, ::prev (renamed to tdc.next and tdc.prev),
oldest_unused_share, end_of_unused_share are protected by
LOCK_unused_shares;
- TABLE_SHARE::m_flush_tickets (renamed to tdc.m_flush_tickets)
is protected by TABLE_SHARE::tdc.LOCK_table_share;
- refresh_version (renamed to tdc_version) use atomics.
Description:
Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on
LOCK_status mutex.
On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe.
Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
Windows version, do not support recursion according to their
documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock,
which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
if there are concurrent lock requests.
Fix:
This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using
counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter
fill_status() function first time.
Description:
Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on
LOCK_status mutex.
On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe.
Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
Windows version, do not support recursion according to their
documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock,
which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
if there are concurrent lock requests.
Fix:
This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using
counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter
fill_status() function first time.
Description:
Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on
LOCK_status mutex.
On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe.
Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
Windows version, do not support recursion according to their
documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock,
which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
if there are concurrent lock requests.
Fix:
This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using
counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter
fill_status() function first time.
Description:
Original fix Bug#11765744 changed mutex to read write lock
to avoid multiple recursive lock acquire operation on
LOCK_status mutex.
On Windows, locking read-write lock recursively is not safe.
Slim read-write locks, which MySQL uses if they are supported by
Windows version, do not support recursion according to their
documentation. For our own implementation of read-write lock,
which is used in cases when Windows version doesn't support SRW,
recursive locking of read-write lock can easily lead to deadlock
if there are concurrent lock requests.
Fix:
This patch reverts the previous fix for bug#11765744 that used
read-write locks. Instead problem of recursive locking for
LOCK_status mutex is solved by tracking recursion level using
counter in THD object and acquiring lock only once when we enter
fill_status() function first time.
includes:
* remove some remnants of "Bug#14521864: MYSQL 5.1 TO 5.5 BUGS PARTITIONING"
* introduce LOCK_share, now LOCK_ha_data is strictly for engines
* rea_create_table() always creates .par file (even in "frm-only" mode)
* fix a 5.6 bug, temp file leak on dummy ALTER TABLE
Apply the patch from Patryk Pomykalski:
- create_internal_tmp_table_from_heap() will now return information whether
the last row that we tried to write was a duplicate row.
(mysql-5.6 also has this change)
