transactional SELECT and ALTER TABLE ... REBUILD PARTITION".
The goal of this patch is to decouple type of metadata
lock acquired for table by open_tables() from type of
table-level lock to be acquired on it.
To achieve this we change approach to how we determine what
type of metadata lock should be acquired on table to be open.
Now instead of inferring it at open_tables() time from flags
and type of table-level lock we rely on that type of metadata
lock is properly set at parsing time and is not changed
further.
multiquery packet).
Background:
- a query can contain multiple SQL statements;
- the server frees resources allocated to process a query when the
whole query is handled. In other words, resources allocated to process
one SQL statement from a multi-statement query are freed when all SQL
statements are handled.
The problem was that the parser allocated a buffer of size of the whole
query for each SQL statement in a multi-statement query. Thus, if a query
had many SQL-statements (so, the query was long), but each SQL statement
was short, ther parser tried to allocate huge amount of memory (number of
small SQL statements * length of the whole query).
The memory was allocated for a so-called "cpp buffer", which is intended to
store pre-processed SQL statement -- SQL text without version specific
comments.
The fix is to allocate memory for the "cpp buffer" once for all SQL
statements (once for a query).
for ALTER TABLE, LOAD DATA).
ROW_COUNT is now assigned according to the following rules:
- In my_ok():
- for DML statements: to the number of affected rows;
- for DDL statements: to 0.
- In my_eof(): to -1 to indicate that there was a result set.
We derive this semantics from the JDBC specification, where int
java.sql.Statement.getUpdateCount() is defined to (sic) "return the
current result as an update count; if the result is a ResultSet
object or there are no more results, -1 is returned".
- In my_error(): to -1 to be compatible with the MySQL C API and
MySQL ODBC driver.
- For SIGNAL statements: to 0 per WL#2110 specification. Zero is used
since that's the "default" value of ROW_COUNT in the diagnostics area.
Fix for bug #46947 "Embedded SELECT without FOR UPDATE is
causing a lock", with after-review fixes.
SELECT statements with subqueries referencing InnoDB tables
were acquiring shared locks on rows in these tables when they
were executed in REPEATABLE-READ mode and with statement or
mixed mode binary logging turned on.
This was a regression which were introduced when fixing
bug 39843.
The problem was that for tables belonging to subqueries
parser set TL_READ_DEFAULT as a lock type. In cases when
statement/mixed binary logging at open_tables() time this
type of lock was converted to TL_READ_NO_INSERT lock at
open_tables() time and caused InnoDB engine to acquire
shared locks on reads from these tables. Although in some
cases such behavior was correct (e.g. for subqueries in
DELETE) in case of SELECT it has caused unnecessary locking.
This patch tries to solve this problem by rethinking our
approach to how we handle locking for SELECT and subqueries.
Now we always set TL_READ_DEFAULT lock type for all cases
when we read data. When at open_tables() time this lock
is interpreted as TL_READ_NO_INSERT or TL_READ depending
on whether this statement as a whole or call to function
which uses particular table should be written to the
binary log or not (if yes then statement should be properly
serialized with concurrent statements and stronger lock
should be acquired).
Test coverage is added for both InnoDB and MyISAM.
This patch introduces an "incompatible" change in locking
scheme for subqueries used in SELECT ... FOR UPDATE and
SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE.
In 4.1 the server would use a snapshot InnoDB read for
subqueries in SELECT FOR UPDATE and SELECT .. IN SHARE MODE
statements, regardless of whether the binary log is on or off.
If the user required a different type of read (i.e. locking read),
he/she could request so explicitly by providing FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE
clause for each individual subquery.
On of the patches for 5.0 broke this behaviour (which was not documented
or tested), and started to use locking reads fora all subqueries in SELECT ...
FOR UPDATE/IN SHARE MODE. This patch restored 4.1 behaviour.
Statements with CONNECTION_ID were forced to be kept in the transactional
cache and by consequence non-transactional changes that were supposed to
be flushed ahead of the transaction were kept in the transactional cache.
This happened because after BUG#51894 any statement whose thd's
thread_specific_used was set was kept in the transactional cache. The idea
was to keep changes on temporary tables in the transactional cache. However,
the thread_specific_used was set not only for statements that accessed
temporary tables but also when the CONNECTION_ID was used.
To fix the problem, we created a new variable to keep track of updates
to temporary tables.
Adding my_global.h first in all files using
NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS.
Correcting a merge problem resulting from a changed definition
of check_some_access compared to the original patches.
This patch:
- Moves all definitions from the mysql_priv.h file into
header files for the component where the variable is
defined
- Creates header files if the component lacks one
- Eliminates all include directives from mysql_priv.h
- Eliminates all circular include cycles
- Rename time.cc to sql_time.cc
- Rename mysql_priv.h to sql_priv.h
LOCK kills the server.
Prohibit FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK application to views or
temporary tables.
Fix a subtle bug in the implementation when we actually
did not remove table share objects from the table cache after
acquiring exclusive locks.
Diagnostics_area::set_ok_status on DROP FUNCTION
This assert tests that the server is not trying to send "ok" to
the client if an error has occured during statement processing.
In this case, the assert was triggered by lock timeout errors when
accessing system tables to do an implicit REVOKE after executing
DROP FUNCTION/PROCEDURE. In practice, this was only likely to
happen with very low values for "lock_wait_timeout" (in the bug report
1 second was used). These errors were ignored and the server tried
to send "ok" to the client, triggering the assert.
The patch for Bug#45225 introduced lock timeouts for metadata locks.
This made it possible to get timeouts when accessing system tables.
Note that a followup patch for Bug#45225 pushed after this
bug was reported, changed accessing of system tables such
that the user-supplied timeout value is ignored and the maximum
timeout value is used instead. This exact bug was therefore
only noticeable in the period between the initial Bug#45225 patch
and the followup patch.
However, the same problem could occur for any errors during revoking
of privileges - not just timeouts. This patch fixes the problem by
making sure that any errors during revoking of privileges are
reported to the client.
Test case added to sp-destruct.test. Since the original bug is not
reproducable now that system tables are accessed using a a long
timeout value, this test instead calls DROP FUNCTION with a grant
system table missing.
Extend and implement the grammar that allows to FLUSH WITH READ LOCK
a list of tables, rather than all of them.
Incompatible grammar change:
Previously one could perform FLUSH TABLES, HOSTS, PRIVILEGES in a single
statement.
After this change, FLUSH TABLES must always be alone on the list.
Judging by the test suite, however, the old extended syntax
was never or very rarely used.
The new statement requires RELOAD ACL global privilege and
LOCK_TABLES_ACL | SELECT_ACL on individual tables.
In other words, it's an atomic combination of LOCK TALBES <list> READ
and FLUSH TABLES <list>, and requires respective privileges.
For additional information about the semantics, please
see WL#5000 and the comment for flush_tables_with_read_lock()
function in sql_parse.cc
Attempts to execute RESET statements within a transaction that
had acquired metadata locks, led to an assertion failure on
debug servers. This bug didn't cause any problems on release
builds.
The triggered assert is designed to check that caches are not
flushed or reset while having active transactions. It is triggered
if acquired metadata locks exist that are not from LOCK TABLE or
HANDLER statements.
In this case it was triggered by RESET QUERY CACHE while having
an active transaction that had acquired locks. The reason the
assertion was triggered, was that RESET statements, unlike the
similar FLUSH statements, was not causing an implicit commit.
This patch fixes the problem by making sure RESET statements
commit the current transaction before executing. The commit
causes acquired metadata locks to be released, preventing the
assertion from being triggered.
Incompatible change: This patch changes RESET statements so
that they cause an implicit commit.
Test case added to query_cache.test.
This patch prevents system threads and system table accesses from
using user-specified values for "lock_wait_timeout". Instead all
such accesses are done using the default value (1 year).
This prevents background tasks (such as replication, events,
accessing stored function definitions, logging, reading time-zone
information, etc.) from failing in cases where the global value
of "lock_wait_timeout" is set very low.
The patch also simplifies the open tables API. Rather than adding
another convenience function for opening and locking system tables,
this patch removes most of the existing convenience functions for
open_and_lock_tables_derived(). Before, open_and_lock_tables() was
a convenience function that enforced derived tables handling, while
open_and_lock_tables_derived() was the main function where derived
tables handling was optional. Now, this convencience function is
gone and the main function is renamed to open_and_lock_tables().
No test case added as it would have required the use of --sleep to
check that system threads and system tables have a different timeout
value from the user-specified "lock_wait_timeout" system variable.
It appears that stack overflow checks for recusrive stored procedure
calls, that run in the normal server, did not work in embedded and were
dummified with preprocessor magic( #ifndef EMBEDDED_SERVER ).
The fix is to remove ifdefs, there is no reason not to run overflow checks
and crash in deeply recursive calls.
Note: Start of the stack (thd->thread_stack variable) in embedded is not
necessarily exact but stil provides the best guess. Unless the caller of
mysql_read_connect() is already deep in the stack, thd->thread_stack
variable should approximate stack start address well.
failed in enter_locked_tables_mode".
Server was aborted due to assertion failure when one tried to
execute statement requiring prelocking (i.e. firing triggers
or using stored functions) while having open HANDLERs.
The problem was that THD::enter_locked_tables_mode() method
which was called at the beginning of execution of prelocked
statement assumed there are no open HANDLERs. It had to do
so because corresponding THD::leave_locked_tables_mode()
method was unable to properly restore MDL sentinel when
leaving LOCK TABLES/prelocked mode in the presence of open
HANDLERs.
This patch solves this problem by changing the latter method
to properly restore MDL sentinel and thus removing need for
this assumption. As a side-effect, it lifts unjustified
limitation by allowing to keep HANDLERs open when entering
LOCK TABLES mode.
and MDL".
Concurrent execution of a multi-DELETE statement and ALTER
TABLE statement which affected one of the tables used in
the multi-DELETE sometimes led to deadlock.
Similar deadlocks might have occured when one performed
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on a view and concurrently executed
ALTER TABLE for the view's underlying table, or when one
concurrently executed TRUNCATE TABLE for InnoDB table and
ALTER TABLE for the same table.
These deadlocks were caused by a discrepancy between types of
metadata and thr_lock.cc locks acquired by those statements.
What happened was that multi-DELETE/TRUNCATE/DML-through-the-
view statement in the first connection acquired SR lock on a
table, then ALTER TABLE would come in in the second connection
and acquire SNW metadata lock and TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
thr_lock.c lock and then would start waiting for the first
connection during lock upgrade. After that the statement in
the first connection would try to acquire TL_WRITE lock on
table and would start waiting for the second connection,
creating a deadlock.
This patch solves this problem by ensuring that we acquire
SW metadata lock in all cases in which we acquiring write
thr_lock.c lock. This guarantees that deadlocks like the
one described above won't occur since all lock conflicts
in such situation are resolved within MDL subsystem.
This patch also adds assert which should guarantee that
such situations won't arise in future.
Cherry-pick a fix Bug#37148 from next-mr, to preserve
file ids of the added files, and ensure that all the necessary
changes have been pulled.
Since initially Bug#37148 was null-merged into 6.0,
the changeset that is now being cherry-picked was likewise
null merged into next-4284.
Now that Bug#37148 has been reapplied to 6.0, try to make
it work with next-4284. This is also necessary to be able
to pull other changes from 5.1-rep into next-4284.
To resolve the merge issues use this changeset applied
to 6.0:
revid:jperkin@sun.com-20091216103628-ylhqf7s6yegui2t9
revno: 3776.1.1
committer: He Zhenxing <zhenxing.he@sun.com>
branch nick: 6.0-codebase-bugfixing
timestamp: Thu 2009-12-17 17:02:50 +0800
message:
Fix merge problem with Bug#37148
Add a wait-for graph based deadlock detector to the
MDL subsystem.
Fixes bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock" and
bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and
alter table".
The first bug manifested itself as an unwarranted abort of a
transaction with ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error by a concurrent ALTER
statement, when this transaction tried to repeat use of a
table, which it has already used in a similar fashion before
ALTER started.
The second bug showed up as a deadlock between table-level
locks and InnoDB row locks, which was "detected" only after
innodb_lock_wait_timeout timeout.
A transaction would start using the table and modify a few
rows.
Then ALTER TABLE would come in, and start copying rows
into a temporary table. Eventually it would stumble on
the modified records and get blocked on a row lock.
The first transaction would try to do more updates, and get
blocked on thr_lock.c lock.
This situation of circular wait would only get resolved
by a timeout.
Both these bugs stemmed from inadequate solutions to the
problem of deadlocks occurring between different
locking subsystems.
In the first case we tried to avoid deadlocks between metadata
locking and table-level locking subsystems, when upgrading shared
metadata lock to exclusive one.
Transactions holding the shared lock on the table and waiting for
some table-level lock used to be aborted too aggressively.
We also allowed ALTER TABLE to start in presence of transactions
that modify the subject table. ALTER TABLE acquires
TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock at start, and that block all writes
against the table (naturally, we don't want any writes to be lost
when switching the old and the new table). TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ
lock, in turn, would block the started transaction on thr_lock.c
lock, should they do more updates. This, again, lead to the need
to abort such transactions.
The second bug occurred simply because we didn't have any
mechanism to detect deadlocks between the table-level locks
in thr_lock.c and row-level locks in InnoDB, other than
innodb_lock_wait_timeout.
This patch solves both these problems by moving lock conflicts
which are causing these deadlocks into the metadata locking
subsystem, thus making it possible to avoid or detect such
deadlocks inside MDL.
To do this we introduce new type-of-operation-aware metadata
locks, which allow MDL subsystem to know not only the fact that
transaction has used or is going to use some object but also what
kind of operation it has carried out or going to carry out on the
object.
This, along with the addition of a special kind of upgradable
metadata lock, allows ALTER TABLE to wait until all
transactions which has updated the table to go away.
This solves the second issue.
Another special type of upgradable metadata lock is acquired
by LOCK TABLE WRITE. This second lock type allows to solve the
first issue, since abortion of table-level locks in event of
DDL under LOCK TABLES becomes also unnecessary.
Below follows the list of incompatible changes introduced by
this patch:
- From now on, ALTER TABLE and CREATE/DROP TRIGGER SQL (i.e. those
statements that acquire TL_WRITE_ALLOW_READ lock)
wait for all transactions which has *updated* the table to
complete.
- From now on, LOCK TABLES ... WRITE, REPAIR/OPTIMIZE TABLE
(i.e. all statements which acquire TL_WRITE table-level lock) wait
for all transaction which *updated or read* from the table
to complete.
As a consequence, innodb_table_locks=0 option no longer applies
to LOCK TABLES ... WRITE.
- DROP DATABASE, DROP TABLE, RENAME TABLE no longer abort
statements or transactions which use tables being dropped or
renamed, and instead wait for these transactions to complete.
- Since LOCK TABLES WRITE now takes a special metadata lock,
not compatible with with reads or writes against the subject table
and transaction-wide, thr_lock.c deadlock avoidance algorithm
that used to ensure absence of deadlocks between LOCK TABLES
WRITE and other statements is no longer sufficient, even for
MyISAM. The wait-for graph based deadlock detector of MDL
subsystem may sometimes be necessary and is involved. This may
lead to ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error produced for multi-statement
transactions even if these only use MyISAM:
session 1: session 2:
begin;
update t1 ... lock table t2 write, t1 write;
-- gets a lock on t2, blocks on t1
update t2 ...
(ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK)
- Finally, support of LOW_PRIORITY option for LOCK TABLES ... WRITE
was abandoned.
LOCK TABLE ... LOW_PRIORITY WRITE from now on has the same
priority as the usual LOCK TABLE ... WRITE.
SELECT HIGH PRIORITY no longer trumps LOCK TABLE ... WRITE in
the wait queue.
- We do not take upgradable metadata locks on implicitly
locked tables. So if one has, say, a view v1 that uses
table t1, and issues:
LOCK TABLE v1 WRITE;
FLUSH TABLE t1; -- (or just 'FLUSH TABLES'),
an error is produced.
In order to be able to perform DDL on a table under LOCK TABLES,
the table must be locked explicitly in the LOCK TABLES list.
in multitable delete/subquery
SQL_BUFFER_RESULT should not have an effect on non-SELECT
statements according to our documentation.
Fixed by not passing it through to multi-table DELETE (similarly
to how it's done for multi-table UPDATE).
Rename method as to not hide a base.
Reorder attributes initialization.
Remove unused variable.
Rework code to silence a warning due to assignment used as truth value.
condition variable per context instead of one mutex and one conditional
variable for the whole subsystem.
This should increase concurrency in this subsystem.
It also opens the way for further changes which are necessary to solve
such bugs as bug #46272 "MySQL 5.4.4, new MDL: unnecessary deadlock"
and bug #37346 "innodb does not detect deadlock between update and alter
table".
Two other notable changes done by this patch:
- MDL subsystem no longer implicitly acquires global intention exclusive
metadata lock when per-object metadata lock is acquired. Now this has
to be done by explicit calls outside of MDL subsystem.
- Instead of using separate MDL_context for opening system tables/tables
for purposes of I_S we now create MDL savepoint in the main context
before opening tables and rollback to this savepoint after closing
them. This means that it is now possible to get ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error
even not inside a transaction. This might happen in unlikely case when
one runs DDL on one of system tables while also running DDL on some
other tables. Cases when this ER_LOCK_DEADLOCK error is not justified
will be addressed by advanced deadlock detector for MDL subsystem which
we plan to implement.
REORGANIZE PARTITION
There were several problems which lead to this this,
all related to bad error handling.
1) There was several bugs preventing the ddl-log to be used for
cleaning up created files on error.
2) The error handling after the copy partition rows did not close
and unlock the tables, resulting in deletion of partitions
which were in use, which lead InnoDB to put the partition to
drop in a background queue.
'CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ... SELECT' statement were causing 'CREATE
TEMPORARY TABLE ...' to be written to the binary log in row-based
mode (a.k.a. RBR), when there was a temporary table with the same name.
Because the 'CREATE TABLE ... SELECT' statement was executed as
'INSERT ... SELECT' into the temporary table. Since in RBR mode no
other statements related to temporary tables are written into binary log,
this sometimes broke replication.
This patch changes behavior of 'CREATE TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] ... SELECT ...'.
it ignores existence of temporary table with the
same name as table being created and is interpreted
as attempt to create/insert into base table. This makes behavior of
'CREATE TABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] ... SELECT' consistent with
how ordinary 'CREATE TABLE' and 'CREATE TABLE ... LIKE' behave.
Conflicts:
Text conflict in .bzr-mysql/default.conf
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_loaddata_fatal.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_stm_log.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/mysqlbinlog.test
Text conflict in sql/sql_acl.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_servers.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_update.cc
Text conflict in support-files/mysql.spec.sh
