a too large value": the bug was that if MySQL generated a value for an
auto_increment column, based on auto_increment_* variables, and this value
was bigger than the column's max possible value, then that max possible
value was inserted (after issuing a warning). But this didn't honour
auto_increment_* variables (and so could cause conflicts in a master-master
replication where one master is supposed to generated only even numbers,
and the other only odd numbers), so now we "round down" this max possible
value to honour auto_increment_* variables, before inserting it.
before update trigger on NDB table".
Two main changes:
- We use TABLE::read_set/write_set bitmaps for marking fields used by
statement instead of Field::query_id in 5.1.
- Now when we mark columns used by statement we take into account columns
used by table's triggers instead of marking all columns as used if table
has triggers.
auto_increment breaks binlog":
if slave's table had a higher auto_increment counter than master's (even
though all rows of the two tables were identical), then in some cases,
REPLACE and INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE failed to replicate
statement-based (it inserted different values on slave from on master).
write_record() contained a "thd->next_insert_id=0" to force an adjustment
of thd->next_insert_id after the update or replacement. But it is this
assigment introduced indeterminism of the statement on the slave, thus
the bug. For ON DUPLICATE, we replace that assignment by a call to
handler::adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value() which is deterministic
(does not depend on slave table's autoinc counter). For REPLACE, this
assignment can simply be removed (as REPLACE can't insert a number larger
than thd->next_insert_id).
We also move a too early restore_auto_increment() down to when we really know
that we can restore the value.
NDB table".
SQL-layer was not marking fields which were used in triggers as such. As
result these fields were not always properly retrieved/stored by handler
layer. So one might got wrong values or lost changes in triggers for NDB,
Federated and possibly InnoDB tables.
This fix solves the problem by marking fields used in triggers
appropriately.
Also this patch contains the following cleanup of ha_ndbcluster code:
We no longer rely on reading LEX::sql_command value in handler in order
to determine if we can enable optimization which allows us to handle REPLACE
statement in more efficient way by doing replaces directly in write_row()
method without reporting error to SQL-layer.
Instead we rely on SQL-layer informing us whether this optimization
applicable by calling handler::extra() method with
HA_EXTRA_WRITE_CAN_REPLACE flag.
As result we no longer apply this optimzation in cases when it should not
be used (e.g. if we have on delete triggers on table) and use in some
additional cases when it is applicable (e.g. for LOAD DATA REPLACE).
Finally this patch includes fix for bug#20728 "REPLACE does not work
correctly for NDB table with PK and unique index".
This was yet another problem which was caused by improper field mark-up.
During row replacement fields which weren't explicity used in REPLACE
statement were not marked as fields to be saved (updated) so they have
retained values from old row version. The fix is to mark all table
fields as set for REPLACE statement. Note that in 5.1 we already solve
this problem by notifying handler that it should save values from all
fields only in case when real replacement happens.
