Problem:
========
Server fails to notify the engine by not setting the ADD_PK_INDEX and
DROP_PK_INDEX When there is a
i) Change in candidate for primary key.
ii) New candidate for primary key.
Fix:
====
Server sets the ADD_PK_INDEX and DROP_PK_INDEX while doing alter for the
above problematic case.
When MariaDB 10.1.0 introduced table options for encryption and
compression, it unnecessarily changed
ha_innobase::check_if_supported_inplace_alter() so that ALGORITHM=COPY
is forced when these parameters differ.
A better solution is to move the check to innobase_need_rebuild().
In that way, the ALGORITHM=INPLACE interface (yes, the syntax is
very misleading) can be used for rebuilding the table much more
efficiently, with merge sort, with no undo logging, and allowing
concurrent DML operations.
Introduce innodb_encrypt_log.combinations and prove that
the encryption and decryption take place during both
online ADD INDEX (WL#5266) and online table-rebuilding ALTER (WL#6625).
FIXME: MDEV-13668 InnoDB unnecessarily rebuilds table
FIXME: MDEV-13671 InnoDB should use case-insensitive column name comparisons
like the rest of the server
FIXME: MDEV-13640 / Properly fix MDEV-9469 'Incorrect key file' on ALTER TABLE
FIXME: investigate result difference in innodb.innodb-alter-autoinc
and ensure that MariaDB does the right thing with auto_increment_increment
and auto_increment_offset, for both ALGORITHM=INPLACE and ALGORITHM=COPY
(Oracle MySQL behaviour differs between those two).
