[Variant 2 of the fix: collect the attached conditions]
Problem:
make_join_select() has a section of code which starts with
"We plan to scan all rows. Check again if we should use an index."
the code in that section will [unnecessarily] re-run the range
optimizer using this condition:
condition_attached_to_current_table AND current_table's_ON_expr
Note that the original invocation of range optimizer in
make_join_statistics was done using the whole select's WHERE condition.
Taking the whole select's WHERE condition and using multiple-equalities
allowed the range optimizer to infer more range restrictions.
The fix:
- Do range optimization using a condition that is an AND of this table's
condition and all of the previous tables' conditions.
- Also, fix the range optimizer to prefer SEL_ARGs with type=KEY_RANGE
over SEL_ARGS with type=MAYBE_KEY, regardless of the key part.
Computing
key_and(
SEL_ARG(type=MAYBE_KEY key_part=1),
SEL_ARG(type=KEY_RANGE, key_part=2)
)
will now produce the SEL_ARG with type=KEY_RANGE.
row_search_idx_cond_check with rowid_filter upon concurrent access to table
This bug has nothing to do with the concurrent access to table. Rather it
concerns queries for which the optimizer decides to employ a rowid filter
when accessing an InnoDB table by a secondary index, but later when
calling test_if_skip_sort_order() changes its mind to access the table by
the primary key.
Currently usage of rowid filters is not supported in InnoDB if the table
is accessed by the primary key. So in this case usage of a rowid filter
to access the table must be prohibited.
In this scenario:
- There is a possible range access for table T
- And there is a ref access on the same index which uses fewer key parts
- The join optimizer picks the ref access (because it is cheaper)
- make_join_select applies this heuristic to switch to range:
/* Range uses longer key; Use this instead of ref on key */
Join buffer will be used without having called
JOIN_TAB::make_scan_filter(). This means, conditions that should be
checked when reading table T will be checked after T is joined with the
contents of the join buffer, instead.
Fixed this by adding a make_scan_filter() check.
(updated patch after backport to 10.3)
(Fix testcase on Windows)
The issue here is for degenerate joins we should execute the window
function but it is not getting executed in all the cases.
To get the window function values window function needs to be executed
always. This currently does not happen in few cases
where the join would return 0 or 1 row like
1) IMPOSSIBLE WHERE
2) MIN/MAX optimization
3) EMPTY CONST TABLE
The fix is to make sure that window functions get executed
and the temporary table is setup for the execution of window functions
The query requires 2 temporary tables for execution, the window function
is always attached to the last temporary table, but in this case the
result field of the window function points to the first temporary table
rather than the last one.
Fixed this by not changing window function items with temporary table
items of the first temporary table.
Don't do skip_setup_conds() unless all errors are checked.
Fixes following errors:
ER_PERIOD_NOT_FOUND
ER_VERS_QUERY_IN_PARTITION
ER_VERS_ENGINE_UNSUPPORTED
ER_VERS_NOT_VERSIONED
Don't do skip_setup_conds() unless all errors are checked.
Fixes following errors:
ER_PERIOD_NOT_FOUND
ER_VERS_QUERY_IN_PARTITION
ER_VERS_ENGINE_UNSUPPORTED
ER_VERS_NOT_VERSIONED
in row_search_idx_cond_check
When usage of rowid filter is evaluated by the optimizer to join a table
to the current partial join employing a certain index it should be checked
that a key for at least the major component of this index can be constructed
using values from the columns of the partial join.
in row_search_idx_cond_check
For a single table query with ORDER BY and several sargable range
conditions the optimizer may choose an execution plan that employs
a rowid filter. In this case it is important to build the filter before
calling the function JOIN_TAB::sort_table() that creates sort index
for the result set, because when this is index created the filter has
to be already filled. After the sort index has been created the
filter must be deactivated. If not to do this the innodb function
row_search_idx_cond_check() is getting confused when it has to read rows
from the created sort index by using ha_rnd_pos().
The order of actions mentioned above is needed also when processing a
join query if sorting is performed for the first non constant table in
the chosen execution plan.
MDEV-18957 UPDATE with LIMIT clause is wrong for versioned partitioned tables
UPDATE, DELETE: replace linear search of current/historical records
with vers_setup_conds().
Additional DML cases in view.test
The issue here is the wrong estimate of the cardinality of a partial join,
the cardinality is too high because the function table_cond_selectivity()
returns an absurd number 100 while selectivity cannot be greater than 1.
When accessing table t by outer reference t1.a via index we do not perform any
range analysis for t. Yet we see TABLE::quick_key_parts[key] and
TABLE->quick_rows[key] contain a non-zero value though these should have been
remained untouched and equal to 0.
Thus real cause of the problem is that TABLE::init does not clean the arrays
TABLE::quick_key_parts[] and TABLE::>quick_rows[].
It should have done it because the TABLE structure created for any
instance of a table can be reused for many queries.
In the function prev_record_reads where one finds the different row combinations for a
subset of partial join, it did not take into account the selectivity of tables
involved in the subset of partial join.
selectivity values fails
After having set the assertion that checks validity of selectivity values
returned by the function table_cond_selectivity() a test case from
order_by.tesst failed. The failure occurred because range optimizer could
return as an estimate of the cardinality of the ranges built for an index
a number exceeding the total number of records in the table.
The second bug is more subtle. It may happen when there are several
indexes with same prefix defined on the first joined table t accessed by
a constant ref access. In this case the range optimizer estimates the
number of accessed records of t for each usable index and these
estimates can be different. Only the first of these estimates is taken
into account when the selectivity of the ref access is calculated.
However the optimizer later can choose a different index that provides
a different estimate. The function table_condition_selectivity() could use
this estimate to discount the selectivity of the ref access. This could
lead to an selectivity value returned by this function that was greater
that 1.
best_access_path() is called from two optimization phases:
1. Plan choice phase, in choose_plan(). Here, the join prefix being
considered is in join->positions[]
2. Plan refinement stage, in fix_semijoin_strategies_for_picked_join_order
Here, the join prefix is in join->best_positions[]
It used to access join->positions[] from stage #2. This didnt cause any
valgrind or asan failures (as join->positions[] has been written-to before)
but the effect was similar to that of reading the random data:
The join prefix we've picked (in join->best_positions) could have
nothing in common with the join prefix that was last to be considered
(in join->positions).
(Backported to 10.3, addressed review input)
Sj_materialization_picker::check_qep(): fix error in cost/fanout
calculations:
- for each join prefix, add #prefix_rows / TIME_FOR_COMPARE to the cost,
like best_extension_by_limited_search does
- Remove the fanout produced by the subquery tables.
- Also take into account join condition selectivity
optimize_wo_join_buffering() (used by LooseScan and FirstMatch)
- also add #prefix_rows / TIME_FOR_COMPARE to the cost of each prefix.
- Also take into account join condition selectivity
handlerton that is able to processes the whole query. For that it
traverses tables from subqueries.
Select_handler now cleans up temporary table structures on dctor call.
The MDEV-20265 commit e746f451d5
introduces DBUG_ASSERT(right_op == r_tbl) in
st_select_lex::add_cross_joined_table(), and that assertion would
fail in several tests that exercise joins. That commit was skipped
in this merge, and a separate fix of MDEV-20265 will be necessary in 10.4.
Current easy fix is not possible, because SELECT clones ha_partition
and then closes the clone which leads to unclosed transaction in
partitions we forcely prune out. We cound solve this by closing these
partitions (and release from transaction) in
change_partitions_to_open() at versioning conditions stage, but this
is problematic because table lock is acquired for each partition at
open stage and therefore must be released when we close partition
handler in change_partitions_to_open(). More details in MDEV-20376.
This should change after MDEV-20250 where mechanism of opening
partitions will be improved.
This reverts commit cdbac54df0.
