Assertion `used_tables_cache == 0' failed
This bug manifested itself when executing queries
over materialized derived tables /vies and with
conjunctive always true predicates containing
inexpensive single-row subqueries.
This bug disappeared after the patch mdev-15035
had been applied.
This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
is considered as expensive.
It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
optimize_constant_subqueries().
with join_cache_level>2
During muliple equality propagation for a query in which we have an IN subquery, the items in the select list of the
subquery may not be part of the multiple equality because there might be another occurence of the same field in the
where clause of the subquery.
So we keyuse_is_valid_for_access_in_chosen_plan function which expects the items in the select list of the subquery to
be same to the ones in the multiple equality (through these multiple equalities we create keyuse array).
The solution would be that we expect the same field not the same Item because when we have SEMI JOIN MATERIALIZATION SCAN,
we use copy back technique to copies back the materialised table fields to the original fields of the base tables.
This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
is considered as expensive.
It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
optimize_constant_subqueries().
This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
is considered as expensive.
It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
optimize_constant_subqueries().
This patch fixes another problem introduced by the patch for mdev-4817.
The latter changed Item_cond::fix_fields() in such a way that it could
call the virtual method is_expensive(). With the first its call
the method saves the result in Item::is_expensive_cache. For all next
calls the method returns the result from this cache. So if the item
once was determined as expensive the method always returns true.
For subqueries it's not good, because non-optimized subqueries always
is considered as expensive.
It means that the cache should be invalidated after the call of
optimize_constant_subqueries().
Due to a legacy bug in the code of make_join_statistics() detecting
so-called constant tables could miss some of them in rare queries
that used RIGHT JOIN. As a result these queries had execution plans
different from the execution plans of the equivalent queries with
LEFT JOIN.
Besides starting from 10.2 this could trigger an assertion failure.
When the definition of the index used for hash join was created
in create_hj_key_for_table() it could cause memory overwrite
due to a bug that led to an underestimation of the number of
the index component.
In this case we are accessing incorrect memory when we have mergeable semi-joins.
In the case when we have mergeable semi joins parent select will have a table count
of all the tables in that select plus all the tables involved in the IN-subquery.
But this table count does not include the "sjm table" (only includes the inner and outer tables)
denotes as <subquery#> in explain.
This bug happened for queries that used a materialized view that
renamed columns of the specifying query in an inner table of
an outer join. For such a query name resolution for a column
belonging the view could fail if the underlying column was
non-nullable.
When creating the defintion of the the temporary table for
the materialized view used in the inner part of an outer join
the definition of the non-nullable columns are created by the
function create_tmp_field_from_item() that names the columns
according to the names of the underlying columns. So these names
should be changed for the view column names.
This bug cannot be reproduced in 10.2 because there setup_fields()
called when preparing joins in the view specification effectively
renames the underlying columns in the function find_field_in_view().
In 10.3 this renaming was removed as improper
(see Monty's commit b478276b04).
materialized derived table/view that uses aliases is done
The problem appears when a column alias inside the materialized derived
table/view t1 definition coincides with the column name used in the
GROUP BY clause of t1. If the condition that can be pushed into t1
uses that ambiguous column name this column is determined as a column that
is used in the GROUP BY clause instead of the alias used in the projection
list of t1. That causes wrong result.
To prevent it resolve_ref_in_select_and_group() was changed.
The problem described in the bug report happened because the code
did not test check_cols(1) after fix_fields() in a few places.
Additionally, fix_fields() could be called multiple times for SP variables,
because they are all fixed at a early stage in append_for_log().
Solution:
1. Adding a few helper methods
- fix_fields_if_needed()
- fix_fields_if_needed_for_scalar()
- fix_fields_if_needed_for_bool()
- fix_fields_if_needed_for_order_by()
and using it in many cases instead of fix_fields() where
the "fixed" status is not definitely known to be "false".
2. Adding DBUG_ASSERT(!fixed) into Item_splocal*::fix_fields()
to catch double execution.
3. Adding tests.
As a good side effect, the patch removes a lot of duplicate code (~60 lines):
if (!item->fixed &&
item->fix_fields(..) &&
item->check_cols(1))
return true;
Do not try to set versioning conditions on every SP call. It may work
incorrectly, but it's a general bug described in MDEV-774.
This patch makes system versioning stuff consistent with other code and
also fixes a use-after-free bug.
Closes#756
For non-semi-join subquery optimization we do a cost based decision between
Materialisation and IN -> EXIST transformation. The issue in this case is that for IN->EXIST transformation
we run JOIN::reoptimize with the IN->EXISt conditions and we come up with a new query plan. But when we compare
the cost with Materialization, we make the decision to chose Materialization so we need to restore the query plan
for Materilization.
The saving and restoring for keyuse array and join_tab keyuse is only done when we have atleast
one element in the keyuse_array , we are now changing to do it even for 0 elements to main the generality.
Fixed by deleting the sequence if we where not able to initialize it
I also noticed that we didn't always set the error message when
check_killed(), which could lead to aborted queries without error
beeing properly set. Fixed by default setting error message if
check_error() noticed that killed had been called.
This allowed me to remove a lot of calls to thd->send_kill_message().
upon SELECT .. LIMIT 0
The code must differentiate between a SELECT with contradictory
WHERE/HAVING and one with LIMIT 0.
Also for the latter printed 'Zero limit' instead of 'Impossible where'
in the EXPLAIN output.
Explain_query must be created in the execution arena.
But JOIN::optimize_inner temporarily switches to the statement arena
under `if (sel->first_cond_optimization)`. This might cause
Explain_query to be allocated in the statement arena. Usually it is
harmless (although technically incorrect and a waste of memory), but
in case of EXECUTE IMMEDIATE, Prepared_statement object and its
statement arena are destroyed before log_slow_statement() call,
which uses Explain_query.
Fix:
1. Create Explain_query before switching arenas.
2. Before filling earlier-created Explain_query with data, set
thd->mem_root from the Explain_query::mem_root
In this issue we hit the assert because we are adding addition fields to the field JOIN::all_fields list. This
is done because HEAP tables can't index BIT fields so we need to use an additional hidden field for grouping because later it will be
converted to a LONG field. Original field will remain of the BIT type and will be returned. This happens when we convert DISTINCT to
GROUP BY.
The solution is to take into account the number of such hidden fields that would be added to the field
JOIN::all_fields list while calculating the size of the ref_pointer_array.
MDEV-16100 FOR SYSTEM_TIME erroneously resolves string user variables as transaction IDs
Problem:
Vers_history_point::resolve_unit() tested item->result_type() before
item->fix_fields() was called.
- Item_func_get_user_var::result_type() returned REAL_RESULT by default.
This caused MDEV-16100.
- Item_func_sp::result_type() crashed on assert.
This caused MDEV-16094
Changes:
1. Adding item->fix_fields() into Vers_history_point::resolve_unit()
before using data type specific properties of the history point
expression.
2. Adding a new virtual method Type_handler::Vers_history_point_resolve_unit()
3. Implementing type-specific
Type_handler_xxx::Type_handler::Vers_history_point_resolve_unit()
in the way to:
a. resolve temporal and general purpose string types to TIMESTAMP
b. resolve BIT and general purpose INT types to TRANSACTION
c. disallow use of non-relevant data type expressions in FOR SYSTEM_TIME
Note, DOUBLE and DECIMAL data types are disallowed intentionally.
- DOUBLE does not have enough precision to hold huge BIGINT UNSIGNED values
- DECIMAL rounds on conversion to INT
Both lack of precision and rounding might potentionally lead to
very unpredictable results when a wrong transaction ID would be chosen.
If one really wants dangerous use of DOUBLE and DECIMAL, explicit CAST
can be used:
FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF CAST(double_or_decimal AS UNSIGNED)
QQ: perhaps DECIMAL(N,0) could still be allowed.
4. Adding a new virtual method Item::type_handler_for_system_time(),
to make HEX hybrids and bit literals work as TRANSACTION rather
than TIMESTAMP.
5. sql_yacc.yy: replacing the rule temporal_literal to "TIMESTAMP TEXT_STRING".
Other temporal literals now resolve to TIMESTAMP through the new
Type_handler methods. No special grammar needed. This removed
a few shift/resolve conflicts.
(TIMESTAMP related conflicts in "history_point:" will be removed separately)
6. Removing the "timestamp_only" parameter from
vers_select_conds_t::resolve_units() and Vers_history_point::resolve_unit().
It was a hint telling that a table did not have any TRANSACTION-aware
system time columns, so it's OK to resolve to TIMESTAMP in case of uncertainty.
In the new reduction it works as follows:
- the decision between TIMESTAMP and TRANSACTION is first made
based only on the expression data type only
- then, in case if the expression resolved to TRANSACTION, the table
is checked if TRANSACTION-aware columns really exist.
This way is safer against possible ALTER TABLE statements changing
ROW START and ROW END columns from "BIGINT UNSIGNED" to "TIMESTAMP(x)"
or the other way around.
MDEV-14823 Wrong error message upon selecting from a system_time partition
MDEV-15956 Strange ER_UNSUPPORTED_ACTION_ON_GENERATED_COLUMN upon ALTER on versioning column
