When we have a nested subquery then a subquery that was a dependent subquery
may change to an independent one when we optimizer the inner subqueries.
This is handled st_select_lex::optimize_unflattened_subqueries.
Currently a subquery that was changed to independent from dependent after optimization
phase incorrectly shows dependent in the output of Explain, this happens because we
don't update used_tables for the WHERE clause, ON clause, etc after the optimization phase.
Make differentiation between pullout for merge and pulout of outer field during exists2in transformation.
In last case the field was outer and so we can safely start from name resolution context of the SELECT where it was pulled.
Old behavior lead to inconsistence between list of tables and outer name resolution context (which skips one SELECT for merge purposes) which creates problem vor name resolution.
The implementation of the walk method for the class Item_in_subselect
was missing. As a result the method never traversed the left operand
of any IN subquery predicate.
Item_exists_subselect::exists2in_processor() that performs the
Exist-To-In transformation calls the walk method to collect info
on outer references. As the walk method did not traverse the
left operands of the IN subqueries the outer references there
were not taken into account and some subqueries that were actually
correlated were marked as uncorrelated. It could lead to an
attempt of the materialization of such a subquery.
Also added a cleanup for some test cases merged from 5.5.
The problem was that the view substitute its fields (on prepare) with reverting the change after execution. After prepare on optimization exists2in convertion substituted arguments of '=' with constsnt '1', but then one of the arguments of '=' was reverted to the view field reference.This lead to incorrect WHERE condition on the second execution.
To fix the problem we replace whole '=' with '1' permannently.
