1
0
mirror of https://github.com/MariaDB/server.git synced 2025-08-27 13:04:36 +03:00
Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alfranio Correia
60d4662496 WL#2687 WL#5072 BUG#40278 BUG#47175
Non-transactional updates that take place inside a transaction present problems
for logging because they are visible to other clients before the transaction
is committed, and they are not rolled back even if the transaction is rolled
back. It is not always possible to log correctly in statement format when both
transactional and non-transactional tables are used in the same transaction.

In the current patch, we ensure that such scenario is completely safe under the
ROW and MIXED modes.
2009-11-03 19:02:56 +00:00
aelkin/elkin@koti.dsl.inet.fi
d8d6db6f78 Bug#31552 Replication breaks when deleting rows from out-of-sync table
without PK
Bug#31609 Not all RBR slave errors reported as errors
bug#32468 delete rows event on a table with foreign key constraint fails

The first two bugs comprise idempotency issues.
First, there was no error code reported under conditions of the bug
description although the slave sql thread halted.
Second, executions were different with and without presence of prim key in
the table.
Third, there was no way to instruct the slave whether to ignore an error
and skip to the following event or to halt.
Fourth, there are handler errors which might happen due to idempotent
applying of binlog but those were not listed among the "idempotent" error
list.

All the named issues are addressed.
Wrt to the 3rd, there is the new global system variable, changeble at run
time, which controls the slave sql thread behaviour.
The new variable allows further extensions to mimic the sql_mode
session/global variable.
To address the 4th, the new bug#32468 had to be fixed as it was staying
in the way.
2007-12-12 12:14:59 +02:00
mats@kindahl-laptop.dnsalias.net
b9de3ce2a9 BUG#31702 (Missing row on slave causes assertion failure under row-based
replication):

Incremental patch to enable idempotency support for update events again.
The final handling of errors will be done in BUG#31609, and until then
the handling of errors should be consistent between the different types
of changes.
2007-10-24 16:02:37 +02:00
mats@kindahl-laptop.dnsalias.net
24ea15a24d Bug#31702 (Missing row on slave causes assertion failure under row-based replication):
When replicating an update pair (before image, after image) under row-based
replication, and the before image is not found on the slave, the after image
was not discared, and was hence read as a before image for the next row.
Eventually, this lead to an after image being read outside the block of rows
in the event, causing an assertion to fire.

This patch fixes this by reading the after image in the event that the row
was not found on the slave, adds some extra debug assertion to catch future
errors earlier, and also adds a few non-debug checks to prevent reading
outside the block of the event.
2007-10-20 18:19:55 +02:00
msvensson@pilot.(none)
2238ef2b62 Merge pilot.(none):/data/msvensson/mysql/wl3933/my51-wl3933-new2
into  pilot.(none):/data/msvensson/mysql/mysql-5.1-new-maint
2007-06-27 14:29:10 +02:00
msvensson@pilot.(none)
8661497e9b WL#3933 Split main test suite to rpl, rpl_ndb and ndb
- Update mysql-test-run.pl to collect tests from several suites
 - Group test into suites
 - Add suite.opt file
2007-06-27 14:28:02 +02:00