Text conflict in mysql-test/collections/default.experimental
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/show_check.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/r/sp-code.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/binlog/r/binlog_tmp_table.result
Text conflict in mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/disabled.def
Text conflict in mysql-test/t/show_check.test
Text conflict in mysys/my_delete.c
Text conflict in sql/item.h
Text conflict in sql/item_cmpfunc.h
Text conflict in sql/log.cc
Text conflict in sql/mysqld.cc
Text conflict in sql/repl_failsafe.cc
Text conflict in sql/slave.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_parse.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_table.cc
Text conflict in sql/sql_yacc.yy
Text conflict in storage/myisam/ha_myisam.cc
Corrected results for
stm_auto_increment_bug33029.reject 2009-12-01
20:01:49.000000000 +0300
<andrei> @@ -42,9 +42,6 @@
<andrei> RETURN i;
<andrei> END//
<andrei> CALL p1();
<andrei> -Warnings:
<andrei> -Note 1592 Statement may not be safe to log in statement
format.
<andrei> -Note 1592 Statement may not be safe to log in statement
format.
There should be indeed no Note present because there is in fact autoincrement
top-level query in sp() that triggers inserting in yet another auto-inc table.
(todo: alert DaoGang to improve the test).
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 2572.2.1
revision-id: sp1r-davi@mysql.com/endora.local-20080227225948-16317
parent: sp1r-anozdrin/alik@quad.-20080226165712-10409
committer: davi@mysql.com/endora.local
timestamp: Wed 2008-02-27 19:59:48 -0300
message:
Bug#27525 table not found when using multi-table-deletes with aliases over several databas
Bug#30234 Unexpected behavior using DELETE with AS and USING
The multi-delete statement has a documented limitation that
cross-database multiple-table deletes using aliases are not
supported because it fails to find the tables by alias if it
belongs to a different database. The problem is that when
building the list of tables to delete from, if a database
name is not specified (maybe an alias) it defaults to the
name of the current selected database, making impossible to
to properly resolve tables by alias later. Another problem
is a inconsistency of the multiple table delete syntax that
permits ambiguities in a delete statement (aliases that refer
to multiple different tables or vice-versa).
The first step for a solution and proper implementation of
the cross-databse multiple table delete is to get rid of any
ambiguities in a multiple table statement. Currently, the parser
is accepting multiple table delete statements that have no obvious
meaning, such as:
DELETE a1 FROM db1.t1 AS a1, db2.t2 AS a1;
DELETE a1 AS a1 FROM db1.t1 AS a1, db2.t2 AS a1;
The solution is to resolve the left part of a delete statement
using the right part, if the a table on right has an alias,
it must be referenced in the left using the given alias. Also,
each table on the left side must match unambiguously only one
table in the right side.
